This year, we attempted to account for a lower rate of first - year
ice loss near the pole, but our outlook was still significantly lower than the actual minimum.
The pattern in Figure 3 is favorable for sea
ice loss near the Canadian side of the North Pole and in the Kara Sea, but not in the Pacific Arctic as in previous summers.
Not exact matches
Melting
near the edges of the Greenland
ice sheet, where the surface is below 4,000 feet, causes about half of its annual
ice loss.
Located between Greenland and Russia, Svalbard experienced a
near - complete
loss of its vegetation during the last
ice age and was quite sparse even 10,000 years ago, but today it is home to a thriving plant community.
The study, published this month in the journal Diversity and Distributions, is one of the first to consider the indirect effects of sea
ice loss on Arctic species that dwell
near the
ice, but don't necessarily depend on it for survival.
Lead author Dr Malcolm McMillan from the University of Leeds said: «We find that
ice losses continue to be most pronounced along the fast - flowing
ice streams of the Amundsen Sea sector, with thinning rates of between 4 and 8 metres per year
near to the grounding lines of the Pine Island, Thwaites and Smith Glaciers.»
Cordilleran
Ice Sheet mass
loss responded to climate reversals
near the Pleistocene Termination
By my logic I'd apply the precautionary principle rather strongly if there was even a small chance of major effects such as
near future sea
ice loss...
It seems that the
near - zero replenishment of the MY
ice cover after the summers of 2005 and 2007, an imbalance in the cycle of replenishment and
ice export, has played a significant role in the
loss of Arctic sea
ice volume over the ICESat record.
There continues to be significant excess heat storage in the Arctic Ocean at the end of summer due to continued
near - record sea
ice loss.
When this reinforces the anthropogenic change, it can cause RILEs [rapid
ice loss events]-- but it can also counter that change and cause brief periods of
near - stability (or even small increases on a decadal scale).
This in no way means that the
ice loss is not large, important, and likely to result in
near ice - free Septembers later this century though!
However, despite
near normal rates of
ice loss during the month, June 2015 was a relatively warm month (Figure 7) with 925 hPa air temperatures up to 2.5 C higher than average
near the North Pole and East Siberian Sea, with even warmer air temperatures in the Kara Sea (up to 4.5 C).
-LSB-...] In fact, the global sea -
ice record shows virtually no change throughout the past 30 years, because the quite rapid
loss of Arctic sea
ice since the satellites were watching has been matched by a
near - equally rapid gain of Antarctic sea
ice.
In 2010, a study using GRACE and Global Positioning System (GPS) measurements from three long - term sites on bedrock
near the
ice sheet found that the
ice loss already documented over southern Greenland was spreading along the northwestern coast.
NSIDC scientist Walt Meier said: «Atmospheric and oceanic conditions were not as conducive to
ice loss this year, but the melt still
neared 2007 levels.
In more recent years, even as forecasts of global sea - level rise have been notched up, most projections have not taken into account the possibility of a significant,
near - term
ice loss from the West Antarctic.
In 2009 the DA was strong in June and July, suggesting a
near record sea
ice loss for that year, but by August the DA pressure pattern was replaced by the more normal low pressure center.
Continuous
ice - melting due to glacier recession (
loss of
ice due to excess melting) caused the formation of seven new lakes
near the mouth of the glaciers.
In the most dramatic of the simulated events, the September
ice pack undergoes a 4 million square km
loss (about 60 percent of the 1979 - 2000
ice cover) in only a decade, leading to
near ice - free September conditions by 2040.
This is not because there was not thicker winter sea
ice near Iceland (there was), but because that was more than compensated by sea
ice losses in less accessible areas so that overall sea
ice extent declined in that period (albeit, slowly):
Regardless of specific emissivities, temperature alone lets us state that
ice - covered Arctic waters
near the equinox at times of minimum Arctic sea
ice extent will radiate more energy
losses than ocean - covered sea waters at the same latitude and time of year!
The effect any previous year of sea
ice reflectivity or heat
loss or heat gain has been lost over the previous winter, and each year's energy budget must stand alone: That sea
ice was
near recent all - time highs in March and April 2012 indicates that an all - time sea
ice low in September can't be attributed to any particular sea
ice measurement in 2011, 2010, or 1979.
More on Greenland: Greenland Glacier About to Lose Manhattan - sized
Ice Chunk (Video) Greenland
Ice Cover
Loss Shown with New Earth - Space Monitoring System (Video) Watch Greenland Melting - on the Icecam Strange New Fish Discovered
Near Greenland Greenland Questions Global Warming Controls While Embracing Independence Subtropical Water Melting Greenland Glaciers from Within
Sustained warming greater than some threshold would lead to the
near - complete
loss of the Greenland
ice sheet over a millennium or more, causing a global mean sea - level rise of up to 7 meters [23 feet](high confidence).
That was a key point of Part I of this post; that in the real world, key climate change impacts — sea -
ice loss,
ice - sheet melting, temperature, and sea - level rise — are all either
near the top or actually in excess of their values as predicted by the IPCC's climate models.
After a slowdown in
ice loss, however, measures are back to a
near - normal range.
Because of changes in Earth's gravity field resulting from
ice sheet mass
loss, ocean sea level will actually drop
near the areas of melt and rise elsewhere.
Khan, S. A., L. Liu, J. Wahr, I. Howat, I. Joughin, T. van Dam, and K. Fleming, GPS measurements of crustal uplift
near Jakobshavn Isbrae due to glacial
ice mass
loss, J. Geophys.
But one modeling study put the threshold level for the eventual
near - complete
loss of Greenland's
ice sheet at a local warming of just 2.7 C — which, due to Arctic amplification, means a global warming of only 1.2 C. Total melting of Greenland — luckily, something that would likely take centuries — would raise sea levels by 7 meters, submerging Miami and most of Manhattan, as well as large chunks of London, Shanghai, Bangkok and Mumbai.
Ocean warming
near the Antarctic
ice shelves has critical implications for future
ice sheet mass
loss and global sea level rise.