I assume this lack of awareness was due to a lack of data on large sea
ice loss seasons and lack of extreme events caused by blocking.
Not exact matches
In the case of Arctic whales, the changes in sea
ice might benefit their populations, at least in the short term: the
loss and earlier retreat of sea
ice opens up new habitats and, in some areas of the Arctic, has also led to an increase in food production and the length of their feeding
season.
The recent string of record - low winter maximums could be a sign that the large summer
losses are starting to show up more in other
seasons, with an increasingly delayed fall freeze - up that leaves less time for sea
ice to accumulate in winter, Julienne Stroeve, an NSIDC scientist and University College London professor, previously said.
This report describes simulations of future sea -
ice extent using the NCAR CCSM3, which point to the possible complete
loss of sea -
ice at the end of the melt
season as soon as 2040.
If you believe that it is not warming then please explain the melting of glaciers,
loss of sea
ice, longer growing
seasons, migration of species, increased humidity, and sea level rise.
The lag between decreases in sea
ice extent during late summer and changes in the mid-latitude atmospheric circulation during other
seasons (when the recent
loss of sea
ice is much smaller) needs to be reconciled with theory.
If the Spring
losses are not due to weather but are due to some other factor then they hold open the possibility that increasing and maintained Spring
losses could be enough to increase the overall melt
season loss so as to leave the Arctic virtually sea
ice free by September.
The lag between decreases in sea
ice extent during late summer and changes in the mid-latitude atmospheric circulation during other
seasons (like autumn and winter, when the recent
loss of sea
ice is much smaller) have been demonstrated empirically, but have not been captured by existing dynamical models.
This report describes simulations of future sea -
ice extent using the NCAR CCSM3, which point to the possible complete
loss of sea -
ice at the end of the melt
season as soon as 2040.
Changes in Arctic melt
season and implications for sea
ice loss.
A continuing trend in glacier
loss will seriously decrease the water reserves stored as
ice, reducing melt
season runoff.
Annual net balance on eight North Cascades glaciers during the 1984 - 1994 period has been determined by measurement, of total mass
loss from firn and
ice melt and, of residual snow depth at the end of the summer
season.
Furthermore, the Arctic has warmed more than twice as fast as the global average, a phenomenon known as Arctic amplification, and stimulated by the combined increasing Arctic temperatures and rapid
loss of sea
ice in all
seasons along with declining snow cover in the spring and early summer.
There are, however, caveats: (1) multidecadal fluctuations in Arctic — subarctic climate and sea
ice appear most pronounced in the Atlantic sector, such that the pan-Arctic signal may be substantially smaller [e.g., Polyakov et al., 2003; Mahajan et al., 2011]; (2) the sea - ice records synthesized here represent primarily the cold season (winter — spring), whereas the satellite record clearly shows losses primarily in summer, suggesting that other processes and feedback are important; (3) observations show that while recent sea - ice losses in winter are most pronounced in the Greenland and Barents Seas, the largest reductions in summer are remote from the Atlantic, e.g., Beaufort, Chukchi, and Siberian seas (National Snow and Ice Data Center, 2012, http://nsidc.org/Arcticseaicenews/); and (4) the recent reductions in sea ice should not be considered merely the latest in a sequence of AMOrelated multidecadal fluctuations but rather the first one to be superposed upon an anthropogenic GHG warming background signal that is emerging strongly in the Arctic [Kaufmann et al., 2009; Serreze et al., 200
ice appear most pronounced in the Atlantic sector, such that the pan-Arctic signal may be substantially smaller [e.g., Polyakov et al., 2003; Mahajan et al., 2011]; (2) the sea -
ice records synthesized here represent primarily the cold season (winter — spring), whereas the satellite record clearly shows losses primarily in summer, suggesting that other processes and feedback are important; (3) observations show that while recent sea - ice losses in winter are most pronounced in the Greenland and Barents Seas, the largest reductions in summer are remote from the Atlantic, e.g., Beaufort, Chukchi, and Siberian seas (National Snow and Ice Data Center, 2012, http://nsidc.org/Arcticseaicenews/); and (4) the recent reductions in sea ice should not be considered merely the latest in a sequence of AMOrelated multidecadal fluctuations but rather the first one to be superposed upon an anthropogenic GHG warming background signal that is emerging strongly in the Arctic [Kaufmann et al., 2009; Serreze et al., 200
ice records synthesized here represent primarily the cold
season (winter — spring), whereas the satellite record clearly shows
losses primarily in summer, suggesting that other processes and feedback are important; (3) observations show that while recent sea -
ice losses in winter are most pronounced in the Greenland and Barents Seas, the largest reductions in summer are remote from the Atlantic, e.g., Beaufort, Chukchi, and Siberian seas (National Snow and Ice Data Center, 2012, http://nsidc.org/Arcticseaicenews/); and (4) the recent reductions in sea ice should not be considered merely the latest in a sequence of AMOrelated multidecadal fluctuations but rather the first one to be superposed upon an anthropogenic GHG warming background signal that is emerging strongly in the Arctic [Kaufmann et al., 2009; Serreze et al., 200
ice losses in winter are most pronounced in the Greenland and Barents Seas, the largest reductions in summer are remote from the Atlantic, e.g., Beaufort, Chukchi, and Siberian seas (National Snow and
Ice Data Center, 2012, http://nsidc.org/Arcticseaicenews/); and (4) the recent reductions in sea ice should not be considered merely the latest in a sequence of AMOrelated multidecadal fluctuations but rather the first one to be superposed upon an anthropogenic GHG warming background signal that is emerging strongly in the Arctic [Kaufmann et al., 2009; Serreze et al., 200
Ice Data Center, 2012, http://nsidc.org/Arcticseaicenews/); and (4) the recent reductions in sea
ice should not be considered merely the latest in a sequence of AMOrelated multidecadal fluctuations but rather the first one to be superposed upon an anthropogenic GHG warming background signal that is emerging strongly in the Arctic [Kaufmann et al., 2009; Serreze et al., 200
ice should not be considered merely the latest in a sequence of AMOrelated multidecadal fluctuations but rather the first one to be superposed upon an anthropogenic GHG warming background signal that is emerging strongly in the Arctic [Kaufmann et al., 2009; Serreze et al., 2009].
Although there is significant
season - to -
season and year - to - year variability of world sea -
ice coverage, there is no dramatic trend in global sea -
ice loss.
Meanwhile in 2012, we've seen record Arctic
ice loss, and the U.S. has faced two record heat waves, a record drought, an above - average fire
season, and now, an «unprecedented» hurricane.
With the albedo - flip kicking in, the energy poured into killing off millennia - old MY
ice will then go into the warming of the Arctic Ocean itself, with the result of longer and longer melt seasons each year & a corresponding ramp - up of ice loss from both the Greenland Ice Sheet and the West Antarctic Ice She
ice will then go into the warming of the Arctic Ocean itself, with the result of longer and longer melt
seasons each year & a corresponding ramp - up of
ice loss from both the Greenland Ice Sheet and the West Antarctic Ice She
ice loss from both the Greenland
Ice Sheet and the West Antarctic Ice She
Ice Sheet and the West Antarctic
Ice She
Ice Sheet.
The very small change in ocean water temperatures since sea
ice measurements began in 1979 does not match with gains (or
losses) in any
season, not from Sept (Arctic sea
ice minimum) over through winter to March - April sea
ice maximums.
Stroeve said that this could be a sign that the significant
losses of summer sea
ice are starting to show up more in other
seasons.
This paper discussed the atmosphere «remembering» the sea
ice loss across
seasons.
Ice loss for the week dropped about 50 % over the previous week, which indicate the melt
season is rapidly winding down.
«The persistent
loss of perennial
ice cover —
ice that survives the melt
season — led to this year's record summertime retreat,» Comiso said.
Increased surface melting,
loss of
ice shelves, and reduction of summer and autumn sea
ice around the Antarctic and Greenland continents during the warmest interglacials would have a year - round effect on temperature, because the increased area of open water has its largest impact on surface air temperature in the cool
seasons.
One
season's weather could either speed up or slightly slow down the
loss of Arctic sea
ice this year, but it will not change the climate trend and the basic causes of warming.
The data show a continuing low value of sea
ice extent at the beginning of the summer
season and an appearance of a weather pattern (the Arctic Dipole) that tends to favor summer sea
ice loss, in contrast to weak and variable summer winds of previous decades.
That brief episode and a subsequent 2 - day melt contributed to 14 % of the
season's
ice loss.
The data from 2011 shows a continuing low value of sea
ice extent at the beginning of the summer
season and an appearance of the Arctic Dipole weather pattern with southerly winds that tends to favor summer sea
ice loss, in contrast to weak and variable summer winds of previous decades.