Not exact matches
Ice sheet retreat continues until a new
equilibrium temperature state is
reached, one determined largely by the end - point of atmospheric CO2.
Hence, when the air temperature decreases,
ice and snow fields grow, and this continues until an
equilibrium is
reached.
However, when there is a lot of
ice melting is it possible to
reach equilibrium?
Ice sheet retreat continues until a new
equilibrium temperature state is
reached, one determined largely by the end - point of atmospheric CO2.
For example, if the Earth got cold enough, the encroachment of snow and
ice toward low latitudes (where they have more sunlight to reflect per unit area), depending on the meridional temperature gradient, could become a runaway feedback — any little forcing that causes some cooling will cause an expansion of snow and
ice toward lower latitudes sufficient to cause so much cooling that the process never
reaches a new
equilibrium — until the snow and
ice reach the equator from both sides, at which point there is no more area for snow and
ice to expand into.
Depending on meridional heat transport, when freezing temperatures
reach deep enough towards low - latitudes, the
ice - albedo feedback can become so effective that climate sensitivity becomes infinite and even negative (implying unstable
equilibrium for any «
ice - line» (latitude marking the edge of
ice) between the equator and some other latitude).
Once the
ice reaches the equator, the
equilibrium climate is significantly colder than what would initiate melting at the equator, but if CO2 from geologic emissions build up (they would, but very slowly — geochemical processes provide a negative feedback by changing atmospheric CO2 in response to climate changes, but this is generally very slow, and thus can not prevent faster changes from faster external forcings) enough, it can initiate melting — what happens then is a runaway in the opposite direction (until the
ice is completely gone — the extreme warmth and CO2 amount at that point, combined with left - over glacial debris available for chemical weathering, will draw CO2 out of the atmosphere, possibly allowing some
ice to return).
I suppose that for a 3,7 W / m2 forcing, the additional energy of forcing + feedbacks is used for faster processes (melting
ice, evaporation, warming of subsurface oceanic layers, etc.) and the new
equilibrium is
reach on a quite short timescale.
Antarctic land
ice won't
reach equilibrium with global climate for hundreds if not thousands of years.
Based on the
ice core dCO2 / dT relationship, the increase in temperature since the LIA has added not more than 6 ppmv to the atmosphere to
reach a new
equilibrium.
Thus even there, a new
equilibrium is
reached in a few decades (for extra CO2 over current land occupation) to millennia (for
ice sheet retraction and plant spread).
When it is warm,
ice melts faster and the glacier will retreat until it
reaches a new
equilibrium between accumulation and ablation.