Not exact matches
Although there is still definitely a declining
trend in Arctic sea
ice (2009 and 2008 were still the second and third lowest sea
ice extents,
after 2007) there was a lot of hype surrounding the 2007 minimum even though that was partly just natural variability in the Arctic climate.
We find a consistent decreasing
trend in Arctic Ocean sea
ice thickness since 1979, and a steady decline in the Eastern Arctic Ocean over the full 40 - year period of comparison that accelerated
after 1980, but the predictions of Western Arctic Ocean sea
ice thickness between 1962 and 1980 differ substantially.
The argument that
after the extraordinary melt in 2007 any reduction in
ice represents a cooling «
trend» show how you think, and in any case I don't see, according to this post, that it is even true.
The minimum
ice extent was the second lowest in the satellite record,
after 2007, and continues the decadal
trend of rapidly decreasing summer sea
ice.
The tipping point was 1998,
after which the
trend has been later
ice breakups, at a rate of about half of a day per year.
By looking closely at this chart you can see that temperatures increased rapidly
after the last
ice age and then leveled off to a moderate increase before starting a downward
trend about 6000 years ago.
Decadal
trends also differ greatly between POLES and TOVS primarily owing to the discontinuation of
ice station data in the POLES dataset
after 1991.
ocean temperatures, widespread melting of snow and
ice, and rising global average sea level,» are three disjoint sources of confirmation that give us reliable enough
trend information to establish consilience about what we may say
after 2005 on HadCRUT4.
After the maximum was reached, the
trend line flattened, with sea
ice volume going down by a meagre 91 km3 from the 16th to the end of the month, which can clearly be seen on Wipneus» version of the PIOMAS graph:
But momentous things are happening, as the earth is about to enter the
ice ages
after millions of years of a cooling and drying
trend that has started to create savannas in Africa's Rift Valley.
After 90 days, the Antarctic Peninsula anomaly can locally exceed 0.5 °C, and within a few years can explain the observed warming
trends at the base of the
ice shelves in the Amundsen and Bellingshausen seas.
Superimposed on the long - term
trends, in addition to occasional hyperthermals, are continual high - frequency temperature oscillations, which are apparent in figure 1
after 34 Myr BP, when the Earth became cold enough for a large
ice sheet to form on Antarctica, and are still more prominent during
ice sheet growth in the Northern Hemisphere.
The paper concluded that «current climate models are still quite poor at modelling past sea
ice trends»
after including a graph showing a decline in sea
ice starting at the beginning of the «satellite era» in 1979.
Take a natural warming
trend which is strong on the scale of the Holocene (not likely
after the Little
Ice Age I know; ooops, mistake there, it's rather to be expected).
They both show a dramatic swing out of the last
Ice age to warm temps (warmer than now) and then swings in temps both up and down in a periodic fashion with each upward swing in temps topping off less warm than the last one, meaning the overall trend has been gradual cooling since the emergence to warm temps after the last ice a
Ice age to warm temps (warmer than now) and then swings in temps both up and down in a periodic fashion with each upward swing in temps topping off less warm than the last one, meaning the overall
trend has been gradual cooling since the emergence to warm temps
after the last
ice a
ice age.