The development of Whitehead's
idea of God occurred only gradually in his writings.
Not exact matches
since
God made homosexuals, and all these heterosexuals keep producing gay kids and we have evidence
of homosexuality
occurring in another animals as well as neuroscience and social sciences since 1963 stating that being gay isn't a disease but a natural orientation and since the writers
of the bible would have no clue that it could be an orientation (just as they could have no
idea that the world isn't flat, not up on pillars, nor is it surrounded by water, nor was the earth created from a leviathan carcass) thus it is permissible and subject to the same statutes heterosexuals are.
If by
God's «glory» we understand a majestic court scene in which
God is seated upon a great throne, lording it over the creation and gloating in his divine magnificence, then the phrase suggests
ideas that are the exact opposite
of the «Galilean vision»
of the Love which is self - giving, gladly receptive, utterly ungrudging in generous openness to all that
occurs in the created order.
I agree but add:
God had no alternative to willing that there be some free creatures, first because (pace Alston) the
idea of not creating at all could
occur (if I may say so) only to a confused creature, second because, as Peirce, Bergson, and Whitehead have seen, by a «creature» we can consistently mean only a lesser form
of the freedom or creativity which in eminent form is deity.
For example, both Zwingli and Calvin, among others, were deceived by the proper
idea of God's absolute Lordship and power into formulating doctrines
of God's causal efficacy for all that
occurs in the world.
Defenses
of the
idea that the universe is
God's body
occur both with (McFague) and without (Jantzen) knowledge
of Hartshorne's
ideas.
When the wheels hit the runway, everyone applauded and it
occurred to me in that moment that maybe human beings just weren't meant to fly; maybe we're pushing the limits
of what
God designed us to do; maybe it's not a good
idea to live in such a way that not falling from the sky to your death is an occasion for celebration.
Nonetheless, ordinary Catholics within a state
of grace are heirs to the Kingdom
of God, and the graced imagination's new
ideas and solutions to difficult problems, are evident in the daily course
of events that
occur in school, work, families or, as Pope Francis hopes, creative solutions to the environmental crises.
Ford commented briefly on this
idea in The Lure
of God, but a decisive shift
occurred subsequently when he began to wonder how we can intelligibly speak
of «the influence»
of the Consequent Nature if it can not be prehended.
Firstly the
idea that little
of scientific consequence
occurred during the period due to a mindset that was «darkened» through a belief in
God, and secondly that the Catholic Church held back scientific progress in this period for it only to be liberated through the advance
of a more «scientific» and secular age.
I'm not necessarily precluding the
idea that a sort
of god might have helped evolution
occur, We can't really «disprove» something like that.