Not exact matches
He posited that al - amr had normative polarity within it, namely al - haqq (the
Truth) and al - khalq (Creation).33 He described al - haqq by the term al - wujud al - mahd (sheer being [SB]-RRB- 34 SB paralleled the
idea of God described by Michael Sells as «God - in - himself» or that aspect
of God that is
absolute and unconditional essence — remote and mysterious; wrathful and majestic.35 This
idea equals the notions
of sat in Upadhyaya.
One might have expected that a course in moral reasoning based on the teachings
of Jesus would include an introduction to the
idea of natural law and some discussion
of traditional moral teachings, but Cox disagrees with many
of the basic tenets
of orthodox Christianity and doubts our ability to identify unchanging and
absolute truth in religion or morality.
In a pluralist system
of political and economic democracy, each and every one may enter into the free competition
of ideas, but he who claims an
absolute truth threatens the foundations
of the very system: he is a potential fascist.»
He can not distinguish questions regarding the existence
of the universe from questions regarding its physical origin; he does not grasp how assertions regarding the
absolute must logically differ from assertions regarding contingent beings; he does not know the differences between
truths of reason and empirical facts; he has no concept
of ontology, in contradistinction to, say, physics or evolutionary biology; he does not understand how assertions regarding transcendental perfections differ from assertions regarding maximum magnitude; he clumsily imagines that the
idea of God is susceptible to the same argument from infinite regress traditionally advanced against materialism; he does not understand what the metaphysical concept
of simplicity entails; and on and on.
I could go with the
idea of absolute fact but
absolute truth?
This kind
of relativism allows for
absolute truth, while maintaining many
of the epistemological
ideas associated with postmodernism.
Although we come up with all kinds
of reasons to deny God's existence he has made his existence abundently clear through our surroundings and the discoveries
of science... when it comes down to it, most in the science community don't like the
idea of a creator because then they'd have to answer to that creator... this reality will keep many from accepting the
Truth found in Jesus (
absolute Truth)...
While there are definitely some overall «
truths» about eating (like fruit and vegetables are good for you, limiting saturated fats is a good
idea, and others) most
of the information that are being touted as
absolute fact are anything but.