Sentences with phrase «idea of anthropogenic global warming»

I'm sure they'd love to run around arresting skeptics, AKA those of us who «pollute» the idea of anthropogenic global warming and don't like the Federal Government's continuous power grab and carbon tax attempts.

«The whole idea of anthropogenic global warming is completely unfounded,» said astrophysicist Hilton Ratcliffe, a fellow of the British Institute of Physics.

Also, regarding the satellite measurements: they do not themselves argue against the idea of anthropogenic global warming, as you may have suggested.

But taken as a whole I accept the idea of anthropogenic global warming and that we need to do something about relatively soon.

Also, regarding the satellite measurements: they do not themselves argue against the idea of anthropogenic global warming, as you may have suggested.

Not exact matches

I reject the idea that it is somehow inappropriate to acknowledge that catastrophic anthropogenic global warming is not only possible but plausible if we continue with anything close to business as usual consumption of fossil fuels and the other activities that are contributing to ever - increasing GHG emissions.

I have no idea what you are referring to, except perhaps that the rote regurgitation of long - since and many - times - over debunked denialist nonsense is mercifully (and no doubt laboriously) deleted by the RC moderators — unlike every other open blog on the Internet where any attempt to discuss the science of anthropogenic global warming is quickly drowned out by a torrent of pseudoscience, conspiracy theories, blatant falsehoods, and hate speech against climate scientists.

The point is that to argue that «there is no such thing as global terrorism», or that «there is no such thing as global warming» is to fail to take issue with the idea that evidence of global terrorism or anthropogenic global warming is sufficient argument for the execution of the «War on Terror», or for «drastic action'to mitigate climate change.

«there is no such thing as global terrorism», or that «there is no such thing as global warming» is to fail to take issue with the idea that evidence of global terrorism or anthropogenic global warming is sufficient argument for the execution of the «War on Terror», or for «drastic action'to mitigate climate change.

The devotees of both sides of the mainstream climate debate i.e. on the one hand those who warn against the dangers of global warming, which they attribute mainly to atmospheric emissions of carbon dioxide, and on the other those who assert that the theory of anthropogenic global warming is a fraud, resort to hysteria when they sense that their ideas are under threat.

Second, while I found much of your essay compelling and incisive, a second place and reason that at least muting the «Global Warming is a New Religion» assertion is a good idea is that your essay come dangerously close to accusing everybody that disagrees with you or supports the conclusion of catastrophic anthropogenic global warming of being unscientific and / or reliGlobal Warming is a New Religion» assertion is a good idea is that your essay come dangerously close to accusing everybody that disagrees with you or supports the conclusion of catastrophic anthropogenic global warming of being unscientific and / or relWarming is a New Religion» assertion is a good idea is that your essay come dangerously close to accusing everybody that disagrees with you or supports the conclusion of catastrophic anthropogenic global warming of being unscientific and / or religlobal warming of being unscientific and / or relwarming of being unscientific and / or religious.

Until somebody comes up with proof that CO2 «traps heat energy» the concept of anthropogenic global warming is just another crackpot idea.

The models describe the modelers» idea of global warming in response to increased anthropogenic CO2 quite well.

A report compiled by the U.S. Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works and presented to the United Nations Climate Change Conference in Cancun last December quotes more than 1,000 scientists refuting the idea of anthropogenic (human — caused) global warming (AGW) and specifically contesting what they call Gore's scientifically unsound allegations.

It is perhaps no accident that they are most often quoted in the context of outright advocacy for the idea of disastrous anthropogenic global warming (AGW).

(4) What are the implications for climate science of public acceptance of the idea that there is a «consensus among scientists» on anthropogenic global warming (AGW)?

With regard to the wider public «debate» about AGW, though, I don't see how it is a «bad idea» to name names of politicians who deliberately and aggressively LIE to the American people about the reality of anthropogenic global warming and climate change, and who engage in vicious and dishonest attacks on climate scientists.