Sentences with phrase «idea of going to court»

we've had an argument and he wont sign... i would get a lawyer, but hate the idea of going to court.

Not exact matches

I'm going to walk into my business to day and give my employes an announcement, that even though my religious convictions are against the idea of western medicine and the supreme court has allowed me to refuse you medical insurance because of it i wont.

«I like the idea that it's ultimately going to the Supreme Court, because it will put to bed all the talk going around about the Obama executive order being illegal or not, and maybe Congress will be forced to do something» to settle the matter, said Psareas, vice president of the Nassau County Civic Association in Cedarhurst.

Klein also raised the idea of creating a state commission or committee that would screen information presented by victims to determine which ones had enough evidence to go to civil court.

Theres no need to go back to the idea of courting or anything, unless you want to, but simply being.

Kelly Gallagher [00:12:06] Sure, again, for most authors that are starting out, again, unless you have a strong platform, or you have an agent, or you're being directly courted by a publishing house to write a book, the idea of an advance is not likely going to be in the cards for you, or if it is, it would be probably a small four figure number.

The full article goes into some detail about why the history had not been available before (parliamentary privilege under the 1689 Bill of Rights — the courts must not criticize Parliament) and why it might be a bad idea now (it would be too much work for lawyers giving advice or drafting to have to wade through Hansard... [more]

One of the most important issues involved in the determination of whether a particular case is going to be a good idea to take to trial is whether a Longmont Colorado auto injury attorney would have the ability to prove certain circumstances in court.

When you go to court to file your paperwork, it's a good idea to bring multiple copies of the petition with you.

To give an idea of the impact of these changes, 95 % of the claims currently going through court would be affected — losing a right to no win, no fee representatioTo give an idea of the impact of these changes, 95 % of the claims currently going through court would be affected — losing a right to no win, no fee representatioto no win, no fee representation.

I must admit I really liked the idea of it going in the magazine as my barristers tell me they all read it and they have said it is on the tube, train to courts across the country......

The fact that the lower Courts in Dunsmuir were not willing to provide deference to the adjudicator and could not agree on the appropriate standard of review was interesting to me and, as a young lawyer, I was completely enthralled with the idea of going to the Supreme Court of Canada.

On anther note — I was forced to go to court this past week for one of my last litigation cases, and if I ever thought that I might continue litigating family law matters, this case put that idea to rest.

And get an idea of what to expect if the matter went to court.

The Canadian Judicial Council has been behind the idea of electronic versions since 1992, but I guess that, absent «real» directions from the courts themselves, the risk - averse are going to go with what they know will be accepted.

When I discussed Justice McEwen's ruling (holding the fees unconstitutional) at first instance, I noted that three threads run through his reasons: a separation of powers argument, according to which the hearing fees interfered with the constitutionally protected prerogatives of the judiciary; an individual rights argument, according to which there is a constitutionally - protected right to go to court, with which the fees interfere; and a difficult - to - characterize argument according to which the hearing fees are contrary to a certain idea (l) of what public services ought to be like.

Looking at the «grammatical and ordinary sense» of the word «modern,» the Oxford Dictionary, the go - to text for the Supreme Court of Canada (CanLii search found 147 SCC cases referencing the Oxford Dictionary as opposed to a paltry 11 cases for Merriam - Webster), the definition is «relating to the present or recent times as opposed to the remote past» or «characterized by or using the most up - to - date techniques, ideas, or equipment.»

The idea is that all facts will be on the table for both sides and a personal injury lawyer can represent you and negotiate with your insurance company on your behalf, avoiding the cost, time and stress of going to court.

The other great source for new ideas and just monitoring important happenings is to trawl the web - sites of the major appellate courts (Canadian and US Supreme Courts, House of Lords and High Court of Australia are the places I go) and look through their lists of pending appeals and judgments rescourts (Canadian and US Supreme Courts, House of Lords and High Court of Australia are the places I go) and look through their lists of pending appeals and judgments resCourts, House of Lords and High Court of Australia are the places I go) and look through their lists of pending appeals and judgments reserved.

The Cupertino - based company goes to great lengths to keep the competition guessing and now thanks to court filings from GT Advanced, we have an idea of just how serious they are.

On anther note — I was forced to go to court this past week for one of my last litigation cases, and if I ever thought that I might continue litigating family law matters, this case put that idea to rest.

There are several reasons: (a) it's less adversarial than going to court; (b) it's more private; (c) you retain control of the process — i.e., you are not bound by what the mediator thinks (indeed, most mediators see their role as helping the parties effectuate their goals, not imposing the mediator's ideas); (d) it's usually much less expensive; (e) if there are children involved, the process is less likely to embroil them in a painful conflict; and (f) mediation often gives divorcing couples a better chance of successfully negotiating issues that may come up in the future (such as child support, alimony, or custody and visitation issues).

As more people embrace the idea of mediation, collaborative divorce, and even settling things themselves without going to court, more and more divorces are uncontested.

But your lawyer can still give you a general idea of what would probably happen if you went to court.)