Christian moral thinking has accepted this and has given marriage a special blessing, surrounding it with the aura of divine approval even if it has not always realistically grasped the fact that marriage is not inevitably an ideal state and that to insist on its continuance when love is absent is to condone what in effect is legalized rape and hence hardly an appropriate symbol for the Christian
idea of marriage as representing «the mystical union of Christ and his Church.»
But what is the reason of principle that can be given by those who, while rejecting the idea that sexual - reproductive complementarity is an essential element of marriage, do not --- or do not yet --- wish to give up
the idea of marriage as the sexually exclusive union of two, and not more than two, persons?
Not exact matches
It's also a good
idea to run the numbers any time you experience a major life change, such
as a
marriage, divorce, or the birth
of a child.
As an atheist who believes in «Choice» (I dislike the idea of abortion but see the need for people to be able to opt for it) and polygamy (marriage should be for any number of consenting adults regardless of gender) and believes that the idea of draconian anti-gun measures is anathema as it takes away an individual's right to live the way he wants to live, I think that if believing in a deity makes a person treat other people nicer then we should leave that person and his beliefs alon
As an atheist who believes in «Choice» (I dislike the
idea of abortion but see the need for people to be able to opt for it) and polygamy (
marriage should be for any number
of consenting adults regardless
of gender) and believes that the
idea of draconian anti-gun measures is anathema
as it takes away an individual's right to live the way he wants to live, I think that if believing in a deity makes a person treat other people nicer then we should leave that person and his beliefs alon
as it takes away an individual's right to live the way he wants to live, I think that if believing in a deity makes a person treat other people nicer then we should leave that person and his beliefs alone.
It's simple: You don't get to say what
marriage is or is not based upon the bible or the so - called word
of god (whatever that is... think about that for a minute... unless you speak 1st century aramaic you have no
idea what the original writers
of the ficto - mythic texts you now presume
as the word
of god even means!)
As much as this applies to the area of sex and sexuality within the context of a marriage, I wholeheartedly believe that there is something to be learned from this idea within the context of the digital worl
As much
as this applies to the area of sex and sexuality within the context of a marriage, I wholeheartedly believe that there is something to be learned from this idea within the context of the digital worl
as this applies to the area
of sex and sexuality within the context
of a
marriage, I wholeheartedly believe that there is something to be learned from this
idea within the context
of the digital world.
They refused to accept plural
marriage, the
idea of the political kingdom, and temple worship,
as well
as the more esoteric LDS doctrines such
as plurality
of gods and baptism
of the dead.
It could be that
as the first Christians moved out with their message into the Greek world, the popular hellenistic
idea that sexual abstinence was the most important sign
of spiritual purity made it necessary to portray Jesus — even
as early
as the Gospels —
as a virgin, or at least to ignore his
marriage or love affairs.
His
idea of a «suffering God» really qualifies him
as a heretic, so his views on gay
marriage or gay lifestyle are, to me, irrelevant.
Dietrich Bonhoeffer thought that the
idea of vocation had been deeply misunderstood, especially by those among his fellow Lutherans who had used the concept
as a way
of vindicating the status quo and validating such institutions
as marriage and wage labor
as preferable to all other social or economic arrangements.
Up to now, spouses who really sought to live their conjugal relationship
as God wished, to sanctify themselves in and through their
marriage, received little orientation from the teaching
of the Church, aside from the
idea that a certain abstinence is a recommendable means not just
of family planning but
of positive growth in married sanctity.
At first glance, no
marriage in the history
of ideas would seem more unlikely to succeed
as an artificial union
of opposites («arranged,»
as it were, by Yenta the village matchmaker) than that between Jewish ethics and natural law.
Indeed, it has been supposed by some that the teraphim, household gods, (Genesis 35:4; 31:19; 30 - 35; I Samuel 15:23; 19:13, 16; II Kings 23:24) were originally images
of ancestors; that they were honored
as such and were part
of the apparatus
of popular religion; (Hosea 3:4) that mortuary customs which the prophetic school later condemned grew up around them; (Cf. Deuteronomy 26:13 - 14) that the right
of performing the necessary ceremonies for one's ancestors devolved upon a son and that this fact underlay both the sense
of tragedy in being sonless and the practices
of levirate
marriage and
of adoption to avoid such disaster; (Cf. Genesis 15:2 - 3; 30:3 - 8; Deuteronomy 25:5 - 10) and that this set
of ideas and customs was an integral part
of the whole clan organization
of early Israel.
So I was interested to see whether the references Rauch provided really did represent serious efforts to show that one could accept same - sex
marriage while still rejecting
as a matter
of principle, and not merely on pragmatic or prudential grounds, the
idea of plural or polyamorous
marriages.
It does not rise to the level
of a serious effort to show that one can accept the
idea that two persons
of the same sex can marry while also holding that
marriage is,
as a matter
of principle, the exclusive union
of two people who forsake all others.
He condemns ho - mos - exuality even though it is a natural practice (feel free to disagree all you want, but that argument will go nowhere), and his
idea of a good
marriage is a 13 year old girl being given to a 40 year old man
as payment for a land deal, with her bloody sheets being used
as a receipt
of a good deal, and if she isn't a vir - gin (she could have been ra - ped, or her hy - men could have burst while riding a horse or something) she is to be stoned to death on her parent's doorstep.
Among other things, he opposed in a pamphlet the
idea that
marriage between a non-Sayyid man and a Sayyid's daughter should be forbidden; he opposed the custom
of regarding Sayyid as a hereditary title, like Sharif, for descendants of the Prophet, for the word does not mean anything more than gentleman, or the title Mr. Of course such a pamphlet caused a break with the Organization for the Good, for it included several Sayyid
of regarding Sayyid
as a hereditary title, like Sharif, for descendants
of the Prophet, for the word does not mean anything more than gentleman, or the title Mr. Of course such a pamphlet caused a break with the Organization for the Good, for it included several Sayyid
of the Prophet, for the word does not mean anything more than gentleman, or the title Mr.
Of course such a pamphlet caused a break with the Organization for the Good, for it included several Sayyid
Of course such a pamphlet caused a break with the Organization for the Good, for it included several Sayyids.
In theoretical terms, the essence
of contraception is the
idea that man is autonomous and a law unto himself, and he can define the meaning
of the
marriage act
as he wills.
«This
marriage of organizations brings us all together
as one family and allows the best flow
of ideas, innovations, and talent across our company for the benefit
of our employees, customers, and suppliers.»
Sadly, she is wrong in believing that «being a good wife shouldn't be any different than being a good husband»; an overwhelming number
of never - married women want a husband who has a steady job (while men say they favor someone who shares their
ideas about raising children) and that male -
as - provider model most likely perpetuates gendered expectations when it comes to
marriage.
As odd as it sounds, more and more professionals are saying that if a marriage is otherwise healthy, that the only problem is one not wanting to have sex, than an affair might be a reasonable idea that can actually help their marriage as it takes the sexual problems out of the equation for the most par
As odd
as it sounds, more and more professionals are saying that if a marriage is otherwise healthy, that the only problem is one not wanting to have sex, than an affair might be a reasonable idea that can actually help their marriage as it takes the sexual problems out of the equation for the most par
as it sounds, more and more professionals are saying that if a
marriage is otherwise healthy, that the only problem is one not wanting to have sex, than an affair might be a reasonable
idea that can actually help their
marriage as it takes the sexual problems out of the equation for the most par
as it takes the sexual problems out
of the equation for the most part.
So rather than focus on the many issues — sex,
marriage, infidelity, drugs and alcohol, unemployment, nonmarital childbirth etc. — the book addresses, I want to explore the
idea of community
as a force
of good (and sometimes bad).
As much as we love the idea of men being an equal partner in a marriage, we don't necessarily embrace the idea of men being an equal partner in a divorc
As much
as we love the idea of men being an equal partner in a marriage, we don't necessarily embrace the idea of men being an equal partner in a divorc
as we love the
idea of men being an equal partner in a
marriage, we don't necessarily embrace the
idea of men being an equal partner in a divorce.
But
as our research for The New I Do uncovered, the
idea of a short, childfree (that part is essential)
marriage goes, way, way back (you may be surprised to learn how far back).
In truth,
as Bennett points out, the
idea of a short - term contractual
marriage is not new; anthropologist Margaret Mead was talking about such an arrangement back in the 1970s.
While no one can guarantee that your
marriage will be
as happy and healthy
as you hope — or expect — it to be, wouldn't you feel better committing to all those years together if you had a better
idea of where your
marriage was going?
Regnerus (the same sociologist behind a controversial study
of how children
of same - sex couples fare) says cheap sex — sex with little cost
as far
as time or emotional investment — is behind a host
of societal ills, from fewer people marrying to the rise
of unmarriageable men to more people living together to more children being born outside
of marriage — you get the
idea.
Except,
as I wrote at the time, while I strongly believe couples should understand the seriousness
of tying the knot, I equally object to the
idea of marriage being irreversible, kids or no kids.
Marriage may even be regarded
as a «loss»
of freedom or independence, casting a negative light on the
idea.
Still,
as the book's subtitle says, Gilbert eventually finds a way to make the
idea of marriage work for her, which is what all
of us tend to do anyway.
But
as our research for The New I Do uncovered, the
idea of a short, childfree (yes, that part is essential)
marriage goes, way, way back (you may be surprised to learn how far back, but you'll have to buy the book).
But perhaps because
of its unusualness, Ellis was able to introduce an
idea that remains
as radical and tantalizing today
as it was in his time: trial
marriages, in which he envisioned couples exploring a temporary union
of varying levels
of commitment that allowed them to have sex, access birth control and have an easy divorce if desired,
as long
as no children were involved.
Not sure if I like the
idea of writing your
marriage out
as
Therefore, it is undeniably more sensible to forget about Hollywood
ideas of romance, and instead start a
marriage based on the stronger initial foundations
of partnership, commitment, and dedication, rather than something so fickle
as love.
Not sure if I like the
idea of writing your
marriage out
as a contract but I do like the
idea of discussing all aspects
of one's expectations and beliefs.
In addition to legalization
of same - sex
marriage and implementation
of a 2 - percent annual property - tax cap, his first year in office included: a new ethics law, a partial rollback
of the Metropolitan Transportation Authority payroll tax, the first cut in state spending in 15 years, and a rewrite
of the tax code to tax the wealthy at a higher rate and cut rates for middle income New Yorkers — an
idea he opposed in the spring, only to reverse himself later
as the state deficit grew.
The foreign secretary, who lost the 2001 general election
as Tory leader after shifting to the right, spoke out after one rightwinger called on Downing Street to abandon «barmy»
ideas such
as pressing for the legalisation
of gay
marriage.
Hague and Miller spoke out after Gerald Howarth, the defence minister, called on the government to abandon liberal
ideas such
as legalising gay
marriage and reform
of the House
of Lords.
If she did so yesterday during a speech she gave to the Family and Parenting Institute (FPI), the Guardian doesn't say so this morning, but it does report that she described
marriage policy
as one
of the few areas
of substantial difference between the Coalition partners, and said that she'd «no
idea» when the promised
marriage tax break would be implemented.
A decade ago, most archaeologists would have flatly dismissed the
idea, seeing Maya royal women mainly
as marriage pawns, consorts and mothers
of kings, says Reese - Taylor, a warm, energetic woman in her early 50s.
The parents
of both Hannah and Clay (the show's male protagonist) are depicted
as loving adults with stable
marriages, yet they have no
idea what's going on with their kids.
However,
as is the case in other European and Western countries in general,
marriage has lost some ground in recent decades to the
idea of living together.
If you are interested in dating an Indian man, I would suggest that you try to learn about his family and culture
as this will give you an
idea of his beliefs about
marriage and family.
There are instances that they will be personal and look at the
idea of international
marriage as a method
of betraying their heritage.
In the second part, Naina will share her experience with online dating scam, give her
ideas about the future
of the Ukrainian dating and
marriage industry
as well
as give some dating tips.
Russian brides looking for
marriage expect their matches to have the same
ideas of future
as they...
With the help
of dating over 50 sites such
as this, you can start to get more
ideas about how you can spruce up your
marriage and make things more exciting for the future; all you need to do is follow these simple rules, and you'll start to see a massive difference in the quality
of your experiences when dating online comes into play.
We have a proven track record
of helping men and women find love online, and Match.com is responsible for more dates, relationships and
marriages than any other site today Match.com also offers a wealth
of tips, advice, and
ideas for successful dating,
as well
as ProfilePro experts who can help your profile stand out.
Similarly
as Kat's
idea of a wimp, Brock literally slumps his shoulders, hands hanging aloof at his sides, his every sentence exuding the cluelessness
of a man trying to make sense
of the
marriage that's crumbling in front
of him and a daughter he holds little connection to.
As we shoot in August, I loved the
idea of jumping into this movie -
marriage with someone with whom I've already shared lots
of laughs.