Sentences with phrase «idea of the nature of»

Before the recent excavations of houses, however, scholars had no idea of the nature of domestic rituals.

In fact, if I were black, and I did well in school, it could be construed that I'm actually supporting a system that discredits my African - American epistemologies — our way or knowing, our way of determining what the truth is, our idea of the nature of things.

Clearly you have no idea of the nature of commercial real estate.

Pan has been working with the Tang Museum's collection and is exploring ideas of the nature of fact and fiction, the real and the surreal, through photography, sculpture and painting.

Not exact matches

While it's never a good idea to bet against Mother Nature or gravity, the good news is that many of the things most likely to bring your business down are man - made and sometimes the product of your own actions or — more likely - inactions.

The idea that these grand concepts can not be scaled up cheaply or quickly due to physics or other severe limitations of Nature is anathema to a faith in the unconquerable power of human ingenuity and open markets.

He realized that the closed - off nature of computing systems and gaming consoles had led to a generation of kids who like computers but had no idea how to program them.

It's human nature for people to present a good idea and then try to make sure that from that point forward, they're the sole owner and controller of that idea.

The collection of scientific publications out there make up a marketplace of ideas, hypotheses, theorems, conjectures, and comments about nature.

This idea depends on having someone nearby who you can wrap your arms around, so depending on the nature of your relationships with your colleagues, this one might have to wait until the evening, but if you can find someone you feel comfortable getting close to, a simple hug can have profound stress - busting effects, according to the post.

Nick Gogerty's The Nature of Value covers a lot of ground — below I quote and highlight some of the most useful lessons and idea from the book.

Whereas the cash flow statement and balance sheet are still very important considerations in the High Yield Dividend Newsletter, we put put a greater focus on credit assessments and qualitative, subjective considerations given the riskier nature of such higher - yielding ideas, both with respect to income sustainability and subsequent valuation (share price risk).

The projects or other information generated by Idea Hub regarding the likelihood of various investment outcomes at expiration are hypothetical in nature, do not reflect actual investment results and are not guarantees of future results.

Instead, the inclusion of a law of nature or abstract idea exception in a claim is more often than not regarded as sufficient to consider the claim as being «directed to» the corresponding exception in the context of the eligibility framework analysis.

It's a good idea to speak to your insurance agent to see if there is an umbrella policy available that will cover acts of nature.

After all, it is the nature of the markets to punish consensus thinking, and I would say that the idea that deflation will persist and that bond yields will go down forever just might be consensus thinking.

Why does the same science that rejects or supposedly debunks religion because of the preposterous idea of an almighty, all - knowing, always present creator, yet licks their lips at the thought of an ultra intelligent extra terrestrial with the capability to answer question break the laws of nature, have mind reading capabilities, so on and so forth?

In proposing the «Idea» as the wellspring of both nature and history, working itself out by converting the inconclusiveness of time into the universality of Spirit, the Hegelian project invited the final triumph of sheer eventuality over rational order.

Second there are plenty of people who come to their faith as it were through something more than bible verses its called critical thinking people can critically think their way to the idea that they are rather small beings in a relatively huge universe and that they realize that they can't know everything and leave some things including the nature of the universe to faith and acknowledge it as faith if that's how they see the world fine is there anything particularly wrong with that?

On a license plate it would be in bad taste, but not an endorsement by the state of an idea that is religious in nature.

But the idea of personhood and a rational (i.e. spiritual) nature that qualitatively distinguishes us from lower forms of life is, as I noted above, a truth accessible to «the natural light of reason.»

Furthermore, the idea of self - existence is not merely inescapable but «rigorously inconceivable; and this holds true whatever be the nature of the object of which it is predicated».

Instead we will adopt a view that we will call model - dependent realism: the idea that a physical theory or world picture is a model (generally of a mathematical nature) and a set of rules that connect the elements of the model to observations.

Atheist reject the idea of a god and believe their view to be true or they would be agnostic unless they choose no stance at all of a god that of which would require unknowing of what the term «god» means so it would fall under a belief and since they can't prove that a god doesn't exist then by definition it requires faith for their view, meaning it would effect their view of the cause, nature, and purpose of the universe if a god was proven to be true.

I think the idea that the «nature» of Christ was ever a question or that it has had a huge impact on current events is such a minefield (this article is a perfect example) that it is, and has been, ignored.

While not wanting to over-read his work in a different direction, I would say there would seem to be some doubt as to how theological Barzun's idea of nature was.

It ought to come as no surprise, then, that these ideas might be carried further, so that human beings, as merely part of nature, could also be regarded as natural objects for manipulation.

What nominalism called in question is the universal, those principles and causes larger than the mechanism of nature or ideas generated out of nature seen as mechanistic by man.

This view may be argued for in various ways: — first: by appeal to logical laws and metaphysical necessities; — second: by appeal to the existence and nature of God; — third: by appeal to causal determinism (Causal determinism is the idea that every event is necessitated by antecedent events and conditions together with the laws of nature)

Despite our postmodern sophistication and our wishful thinking about perfectibility, our nature is immutable — not least in its fickleness, its embrace of irrational ideas and practices, and its suggestibility.

Maybe your idea of God boils down to just your better nature?

I don't believe my idea of God boils down to just my better nature.

Similarly, in the last section of Adventures of Ideas, having spoken throughout of the primordial nature of God (in terms of the supreme «Eros» of the Universe), Whitehead adds that the feeling of Transcendence

That is, we must establish a new concept based on a balance between these two ideas, thereby achieving an interpretation of the harmonious relationship that is aspired to between human being and the rest of nature.

The main reason that nature lacks intrinsic value is necessarily linked to the orthodox idea of creatio ex nihilo, a view that essentially makes all created things completely contingent upon divine power.

The idea of spinning out nature comes from the Sankhya concept of the evolution of the world out of nature (prakriti).

But though I will argue for this teleological view of nature and human nature from empirical premises and from reason, my purpose here is not to debate or attempt to prove this point, but rather to illustrate how some teleological understanding of nature and human nature is a necessary premise for the idea of environmental stewardship.

He could categorically choose the way of antinomian libertinism (as did the Valentinians), in which case the pneumatic self acted as if it had «a positive injunction to perform every kind of action, with the idea of rendering to nature its own and thereby exhausting its powers.»

People often can not understand the question of human nature because their way of understanding it is framed (whether they know it or not) by the ideas of positivist empiricism.

I'm in a season of rethinking church & I'd appreciate links to the blog posts & books you would recommend that best unpack & support the idea that the western, institutional church wineskin is, by nature, prone to spiritual abuse.

Secondly, both shared the idea of the Roman Empire and of the essential nature of the Church, and therefore of law and legal instruments.

Thus, the highly variable characteristics of both individual human beings and particular human societies flow from rather than contradict the idea that we human beings have a stable nature.

At the core of his system is the idea of the Unity - Law of Control and Direction which presents creation and salvation as the manifestation of a single, dynamic wisdom and purpose that shapes the fabric of every created nature.

The battle of ideas continues, but it is not evident that there is a new generation of conservative philanthropists who understand «the precarious and temporary nature of intellectual influence.»

Its recondite nature, however, renders the idea of morphogenetic causation highly suspect.

The idea of God's hand being directly involved in nature is far more believable than the virgin birth, the ascent of Christ, or the rapture.

Here the consequent nature appears as the «Unity of Adventure» (Al 381) In many ways, Adventures of Ideas is Whitehead's most religious book.

Namely that the idea that each of us has the luxury of using rationality exclusively to come to any deep conclusions about the nature of our lives and the world.

Later the idea gained ground that we can not «speak of nature apart from human perception in the historical development of knowledge», that all knowledge is «a creative interaction between the known and the knower» and that therefore there is no System of scientific knowledge or of technology which does not have the subjective purposes and faith - presuppositions of humans built into it.

And the first idea that suggests itself to us is that the soul must be a centre of transformation at which, through all the channels of nature, corporeal energies come together in order to attain inwardness and be sublimated in beauty and in truth.