= > I have
no idea what point you are making with «I would take something by just its word and a scientist telling me to believe it» what book are you talking about?
I have
no idea what the point of that is.
@MichalStefanow i have
no idea what point you're trying to make with that comment.
I seriously have
no idea what your point is in response to my comment.
The amount of XP you earn and the amount of fans you gain are tied to your finishing position and, most importantly, whether or not you achieve your team's objective, which is rather confusing given that the fans probably would have
no idea what points any given team is aiming for.
Hardcore gamers understood that it was basically just a more powerful Wii, but the average shopper had
no idea what the point of it was for years after its launch.
[Response:
No idea what point you are making.
[Response: I have
no idea what point you are making here.
«I have
no idea what point you are making here.
CO2 is a very long way from being toxic so I have
no idea what point you are trying to say.
Not exact matches
What's your pain
point and future million - dollar
idea?
The
point here is simply to acknowledge
what many have argued about the whole
idea of «post-truth» - it's not anything new, but just more of the same.
If they name a figure for
what they think you deserve at this
point, you have a good
idea where you stand and you can explore whether or not there's wiggle room to go higher.
Truly loyal employees know that you most need to hear
what you least want to hear: that your
ideas may not work, that your
point of view is off, that you made a mistake.
The
point for me was never to tell my student that things were «fcuked», but to provide the framework and information to form their own perspectives and
ideas on
what they were learning and to form a dialogue about the issues.
The
point is to get your
ideas out there and test them to see
what is interesting to people and to get feedback.
«The process of execution includes real customer development, changing your product into
what people actually want and tons of other hard work and learning moments that an
idea - stealer wouldn't have in his or her arsenal,»
points out entrepreneur Brent Goldstein.
Their goal is to streamline the process to the
point where Apple - quality work filters down to cash - strapped tech entrepreneurs who have an
idea for a product but no
idea of how to make it or
what it could look like.
Hilton CEO Christopher Nassetta said during the company's fourth - quarter 2015 earnings call that even though «customers hated it,» the pilot gave the company a better
idea of
what future changes it could explore, including introducing flexible and inflexible rates at different price
points, similar to airlines.
«We're almost into September; if a firm doesn't have a pretty clear
idea what their approach is at this
point, they need to allocate resources to figure it out.»
We've written earlier about how that is generally a bad
idea (more on that later), but to illustrate our
point and in light of the current retail climate, we thought it'd be a good
idea to show you
what happens to a store - branded credit card when the company shuts its doors.
I especially liked a couple of
points you raised in the One More Thing section, where you wrote: «
What if someone who has a great
idea for a project only found out after seeing the calendar?
Couple
points — I think having different
ideas of
what content marketing is is fantastic... I love the conversations coming from that... but when someone comes out and says «content marketing is this, this and that» and it's absolutely not true, I think we are doing a disservice to the entire marketing profession.
Gather the information and data
points prior to discussing with your client, so they have a clear
idea of
what will be included in the study.
(I take your
point, Gary, that this significantly hampers the
idea of Jesus experiencing
what we do as humans.)
As to the
point of Judas being the «most trusted» of the disciples, that
idea is opposed to
what the Bible suggests about Judas.
I have no
idea what role race played, but am just
pointing out your cases aren't the same.
n8263 I like to say that we have «confidence» in the method behind science where
ideas do not become dogmatic, new evidence can change
what we thought we know, and that all the experts are looking for the mistakes and eager to
point them out if there are any.
You're just the product of a more liberal time, and assume that your
idea of
what a proper Christian would believe has always been the case, but the times are still a» changing, and future Christians might
point at some of your positions and cringe too, right?
It's scary... and you know
what's even more scary, is the fact that most 5 -
point Calvinist pastors keep these disturbing
ideas to themselves, and they are leading both small and exceedingly large churches in the direction of Calvinist thinking without the flock even knowing.
Exactly my
point; if according to the Bible and Christ's words himself — that even the Son of God has no
idea about the 2nd coming; I am now supposed to believe
what men on earth say??!!!!! Seriously, how stupid are some people — these are the same people who claim they are religious elite!
Jesus» original disciples likely never thought of him as anything more than a great rabbi, and some might have thought him a good rallying
point for a revolt, they could have even whispered that he was anointed by God, but the
idea of his being divine only seems to enter into the gospels around the time many Greek educated folks had converted, bringing their own views of
what a «son of God» means into the faith.
What he's really
pointing to is the redundancy of an
idea which has become central to our consumer culture.
At
what point did the
idea that all people are created in the image of God lose its currency and appeal?
You may not know this, but lots of god believers actually
point to an old book, which was obviously written by people promoting a religious
idea, as proof of
what their god said.
If I lived under the
idea that it was wrong to question
what I have always believed, I would still be a five -
point - hyper - Calvinistic proponent of Lordship Salvation today.
But it never fails: Any sort of engagement with complementrarian
ideas is immediately followed by the accusation that «that's not
what complementarians really believe» or «you're
pointing to an extreme example» or «you've created a straw man.»
Firstly, it must be remembered, that he disclaims very early in the book that he can only speak for the mainline denominations with which he is familiar, and although my memory may fail me, he implies that he can only speak for his observations of the churches / leaders with whom he is familiar, and also that he may be wrong, and also, that he is only
pointing out
what he calls a possible cause for the problems he has seen, and hopes that his suggestions /
ideas, will be considered, researched, etc, and that time will tell if his thesis bears any truth or not.
I can see how one can look at this
idea and look at the following examples in Hebrews 11 as «Because they were sure they would get this reward, they did this thing» but as the author
points out in verse 39 that they didn't get
what they imagined they would, so if we understand faith as «being sure» it would turn out that it is «being sure» of something and being totally wrong — instead it makes more sense to understand Hebrews 11:1 as saying that «faith is a realization (or actualization)» of our hopes, a realization that the author
points out is greater than we could expect and be sure in.
I shall return to how he suggests we understand value arising from
what is being called, in his peculiar way a «society,» but the
point from Adventures of
Ideas is clear enough: however we learn to appreciate the status of a complex whole comprised of constituents, it must be construed in a manner which permits that complex whole to serve in turn as constituent within a larger and more complex level of organic whole.
> You missed the
point,
what is the
point of stealing a body to promote an
idea which, one the thieves don't believe and two the potential audience is not going to believe in or is looking for.
I live my life in the hope that I am helping this
idea no matter how crazy it is to come to fruition because otherwise we are living an infinitesimal life and
what is the
point.
Then they would go on to teach some sort of dangerous
idea about how a favorite «prophecy» doesn't actually
point to Jesus, or how a favorite text doesn't mean
what most Christians think, or how the misuse and misunderstanding of a particular
point of theology could lead to sin.
It seems that maybe
what John, Peter, James, and Jude did was go to a professionally trained letter writer and provided them with the basic
ideas, arguments, and
points they wanted to make in their letter, and then let the professional letter writer compose the letter according to the letter writing standards of that day.
in other words worshiping the
idea's (or the one providing them) presented by any organization regardless of religion or be (lie) f system is incorrect since they can not absolutely define
what they are
pointing at.
To this
point, I don't have any
idea what is next, or when «next» is going to arrive in my life.
We are told how old the child is but we have no
idea what the child's race or even name is at that
point.
Aside from also starting to post more photos on my blog (which
idea I see you gleaned from monitoring my brainwaves as well), Dean and I were just talking about this story yesterday and how the
point is not doing vs. being, but never being distracted from being a disciple; which is really just being close to Jesus, doing
what he does, listening to
what he says and going with his agenda instead of ours.
Freedom of speech... i am all for it,
what i do nt get is where the come up with the
idea that God and Jesus Christ is a Myth??? At that
point,
what is the
point of your religion?
Since we don't know
what happens after death, any number of things could happen, but my main
point is that the
idea that god gave us free will to choose is an illusion.