I don't believe the «mind» exists nor do I believe that
abstract objects exist in some kind of platonic word of
ideals that we access (again, there's no proof in favor of it).
In a summary of Whitehead's position, mathematics is
abstracted from human experience to become
ideal objects which initially represent general things that are symbolized in classes by variables.
The voracious sexuality and hallmark stylization of Picasso's depictions of women are evoked by the
abstract marks, speaking of a modernist painterly machismo, while the soft - focus female nudes establish woman as anonymous muse, sexual
object and aesthetic
ideal.
Reinhardt describes these paintings as: «A square (neutral, shapeless) canvas, five feet wide, five feet high, as high as a man, as wide as a man's outstretched arms (not large, not small, sizeless), trisected (no composition), one horizontal form negating one vertical form (formless, no top, no bottom, directionless), three (more or less) dark (lightless) no - contrasting (colorless) colors, brushwork brushed out to remove brushwork, a matte, flat, free - hand, painted surface (glossless, textureless, non-linear, no hard - edge, no soft edge) which does not reflect its surroundings — a pure,
abstract, non-objective, timeless, spaceless, changeless, relationless, disinterested painting — an
object that is self - conscious (no unconsciousness)
ideal, transcendent, aware of no thing but art (absolutely no anti-art).»