Sentences with phrase «ideas involve doing»

Not exact matches

Ideas need time to develop and become real before we begin involving others, as we don't want to give competitors any information that could allow them to steal our idea and make it happen before we do.

Thiel, who also supports the idea of creating autonomous islands on which people could live and create their own laws, said he is in favor of a bi-partisan bill called the «Intimate Privacy Protection Act,» which would make it illegal to distribute explicit private images without a person's consent, and would involve criminal penalties for those who profit from doing so.

The «dreamer» never explains how to do anything or the process involved; he or she just throws out one idea after another.

These limitations and complexities aside, the researchers concluded that their findings provide more evidence consistent with the idea that «some men high in homophobia indeed have a sexual interest toward homosexual stimuli, whereas others do not» and that they «provide a better understanding of the psychological processes involved in the processing of erotic gay material among men high in homophobia...».

The idea was to gather a group of nine people together and let them «lear [n] about being an entrepreneur, a freelancer, a marketer,» all according to a «vision that didn't involve going to business school and earning an MBA.»

Besides, do you have any idea what's actually involved in an IPO?

Do you think you have a pretty good idea of what is involved in sponsoring a retirement plan?

That is just a pretense for people who don't have any idea what the paperwork is involved.

Many of these involve Do's and Do nt's associated with the daily office routine, creating a healthy office environment, organizational suggestions, ideas for teambuilding near the home office, investment best -LSB-...]

Do you want to start a distribution business but lack ideas on the steps involved?

Since crowdfunding campaigns do not involve using credit card debt or loan money, entrepreneurs can test out their ideas without risking everything.

Because a patent involves claims, it is a good idea to have a patent agent or patent lawyer do the search.

another example, a small percentage of Christians are called to sacredotal celibacy, but 99.9 % are encouraged to marry - there is no discrepancy involved, and they are not just some ideas in the bible that we pick and choose between to believe - there is one consistent and variegated holistic understanding off the whole bible to those who can reason well and who have minimal training that churches should be doing in sunday, but mostly are not.

However, I (or rather Ratzinger / Pope Benedict) did not cite 1 Corinthians 15 in order to subvert the idea of material continuity, but rather to support the idea that resurrection will involve a profound transformation and not a mere «return of the «fleshly body,» that is, of the biological structure» in the form that we know it today.

This means we need to see that we are defending more than religious liberty: We are defending the very idea that our government exists to protect the space in which various institutions of civil society do the work that enables Americans to thrive, and we are defending the proposition that this work involves moral formation and not just liberation from constraint.

Smith reminds readers of the idea of divine accommodation, which suggests that «in the process of divine inspiration, God did not correct every incomplete or mistaken viewpoint of the biblical authors in order to communicate through them with their readers... The point of the inspired scripture was to communicate its central point, not to straighten out every kink and dent in the views of all the people involved in biblical inscripturation and reception along the way.»

I get the idea from some of these comments that there are those that think that Hawking, looking for explanations that don't involve God, is doing something wrong.

Regarding the cartoon idea involving Grace, David I would implore you not to do this!

DO N'T duck difficult conflicts involving religious and secular ideas: discuss them openly, then violently stomp out any dissent.

Also, I don't understand why people get the Abrahamic God involved whenever someone throws support to the idea of a beginning to this universe.

The idea of DNA forming is the most «unlikely» chance scenario, but still this does not yet involve evolution.

They also like the idea that they do not need to get involved.

Although Whitehead's idea of «creative advance» does not involve «the notion of a unique seriality» (Process 35).

In particular, the denial that epistemology is wholly prior to ontology; the denial that we can have an absolutely certain starting point; the idea that those elements of experience thought by most people to be primitive givens are in fact physiologically, personally, and socially constructed; the idea that all of our descriptions of our observations involve culturally conditioned interpretations; the idea that our interpretations, and the focus of our conscious attention, are conditioned by our purposes; the idea that the so - called scientific method does not guarantee neutral, purely objective, truths; and the idea that most of our ideas do not correspond to things beyond ourselves in any simple, straightforward way (for example, red as we see it does not exist in the «red brick» itself).

We have candidates on both sides whose idea of change 90 % of the time does not involve them or who they feel are the bulk of their party.

Just think about your idea of being «involved with your own life» — getting up in the morning, doing better at your job etc...

I would respect evangelicals more if their idea of freedom did not involve imposing their beliefs on me.

Although most Bultmannians did not go so far, Dorothee Sölle's qualified acceptance of the idea of the «death of God» did not involve a major break.

Here Whitehead and Russell emphasize «the primitive ideas are by means of descriptions intended to point out to the reader what is meant; but the explanations do not constitute definitions, because they really involve the ideas they explain» (PM 91).

If change really involves self - transcendence even, in certain circumstances, to a new essence, even though only in virtue of the dynamism of absolute Being, which of course does not, let it be repeated, alter the fact that it is a question of self - transcendence; if matter and spirit are not simply disparate in nature but matter is in a certain way «solidified» spirit, the only significance of which is to serve to make actual spirit possible, then an evolutionary development of matter towards spirit is not an inconceivable idea.15 If there exists at all by virtue of the motion of absolute Being, a change in the material order whereby this rises above itself, then this self - transcendence can only occur in the direction of spirit, because the absolute Being is spirit.

Anyone, therefore, who does not suppose that in a metaphysical sense more can simply come from less, must, precisely if he wishes to perceive in the production of change through transitive causality a perspective open for «endless» becoming, introduce the idea of infinite Being as the ground of the very possibility of any becoming which involves an increase of being.

Our question concerning Professor Nygren's work does not involve any rejection of the idea that in agape Christianity has a conception of God's love which does transcend other religious motifs.

Tim i found it liberating to just do what the Lord wants you to do i work within his boundarys and yes i attend church and enjoy it.I love the people and i love hearing the word and worshipping the Lord even if others are still bound up with traditions thats not my walk thats theres.My focus is to do what the Lord wants me to do.There have been times i have said no to the pastor he does nt understand why i choose not to lead the worship.i query him as well regarding the idea that its not just performing a function because there is a need our hearts have to be in the right place so that the Lord can use us but he did nt understand where i was coming from and thats okay because of that i just said no until my heart is right i am better not being involved in leading.But i am happy to be an encouragement to others in the worship team i havent wanted to be the leader i have done that in the past.So my focus has been just the singing and being part of different worship teams i think the Lord has other plans as the groups i am in seem to be changing at the same time i am aware that i do nt to worry about change as the Lord knows whats best.I used to be quite comfortable leading the music but that was before when i was operating in my own self confidence and pride.The Lord did such a huge change in my life that i lost my self confidence and that is not a bad thing at all as my spiritual growth has been incredible.The big change was my identity moved from me and what i could do to knowing who i was in Christ and that he is my strength and confidence.Now i know that without him i can do nothing in fact i am dependent on his empowerment through his holy spirit all the time in everything.In the weekend i was asked to lead the music at another church i attend multiple churchs although i attend two regularly one has services in the morning and one has services in the evening so the two do nt really clash.In the weekend i was asked to lead the music its been two years since i did that and i was worried on how i would go.All i can say is that it went really well and because i stepped out in Faith the Lord really blessed the morning to the congregation.The difference is knowing that i serve the Lord with the gifts he has given me but my heart has to be right and when i do it in his way it builds up the body and it brings glory to him.May the Lord continue to show you what he wants you to do even though others may not understand your reasons i just want you to know that you do nt have to pull away completely just work within the boundarys that the Lord gives you and do nt feel pressured by others expectations to do anything that feel uncomfortable.Be involved just as you feel lead by the holy spirit even if it is in a very minor way take small steps.regards brentnz

Inside the idea that «conscience» can permit or even require us to do something long understood to be wrong, period, where's the circuit - breaker that would stop a couple from «discerning» that an abortion is the best resolution of the difficulties involved in carrying this unborn child to term, although under future circumstances they would embrace the «ideal» and welcome a child into their family?

It involves, not belief in the sense of personal opinions, but rather a set of actions (saying certain things, going to services, doing good works, etc.) that can be done in the absence of belief — indeed the nature of a wager makes it such that you fully admit you don't know, which is actually an agnostic atti.tude toward the idea of God's existence.

Newman's gift was to explain, before Darwin put pen to paper, how the growth of new ideas does not involve jettisoning what has gone before but taking it on to new levels.

People acting as if non-violence is not an answer — but I am not saying we don't get involved — let's not pass into the idea of how much violence we will use — because that's dangerous «evil» territory — allow a little in and soon we are talking about how much gunshots fired into a person is «normal»?

The idea of a «designer» does not lend itself readily to a universe involving chance occurrences.

Do you have any idea of the odds involved for the human body to have formed itself as it has all by itself for no reason whatsoever?

FreedmLvDad - jesus did not get involved with government in his day because the government consisted of a Roman empire who did no solicit ideas on how to shape or run a government from its population.

The whole task of identifying intentions seems fraught with peril; for a sophisticated attempt to grapple with these problems, and a forthright account of the difficulties involved in speaking of such intentions, a reader could do no better than to consult the first chapter of Jack Rakove's Pulitzer Prize — winning Original Meanings: Politics and ideas in the Making of the Constitution (1997).

The reason is clear: the discussion about existence as a perfection, as if that were all that is involved, does not make explicit the far more important point that, in the case of «God,» properly understood, nonexistence was never a real possibility, a consideration entirely overlooked by those who blithely say that, of course, we all know that no existence can be derived from «mere» ideas.

:-D I am always on the lookout for gluten free breakfast ideas that don't involve eggs, and these and your lemon chia bars have me covered.

This makes them great ideas for days when you just don't want to get too involved in the cooking process, but want a healthy and delicious meal you can rely on.

I didn't have any clear - cut ideas of what I wanted to make other than that sweet potatoes were to be involved, but a little experimenting actually produced a rather yummy result.

Does anyone have any ideas for tart crust that doesn't involve nuts or a nut flDoes anyone have any ideas for tart crust that doesn't involve nuts or a nut flour?

like something of most any cuisines... as long as it doesn't involve something weird — but of course my idea of weird might be someone's idea of normal!!!

What a fabulous idea, I'm often put off by the work involved of cinnamon rolls, but I do so love them!

In fact, my idea of grilling usually involves showing up at someone else's picnic with a plate full of something or other and instructions to throw that something or other on the grill, acting like I've done all the work, while they deal with the whole fire thing.

I'll post a simple recipe which you can use as a base, as well as ideas and suggestions of how to infuse the humble chia seeds with more flavours, textures and super powers (the latter doesn't involve dressing up as a super hero, I promise!)