Sentences with phrase «ideas of those things which»

In the latest exhibition of paintings and prints by 20th century American muralist and painter, Richard Haines, the gallery offers a new insight into the artist's ideas of those things which endure.

Not exact matches

However, we should have a good idea of which way things are going by around 2.00 am, by which time the results in Wandsworth and Westminster will have come in.

File this one under simple but powerful ideas most people never think of: «Draw all the things you need to do on a big piece of paper, and find out which things depend on other things.

Soon after her brilliant idea hit the market, Oprah deemed it one of her favorite things which skyrocketed her sales.

And all these engineers at Facebook and Google and others are taking this deep learning concept with all these frameworks, which is basically another word for tools, and turning these ideas into things of practical use.

Which is exactly the kind of thing Buffett does so well, whether it's showing up at a football game in essentially a costume, playing a ukelele at the annual meeting, or explaining how he'd gotten his investment idea by sitting naked in a bathtub.

Gordon and his wife have discussed the idea of buying a safe house — something more secluded and modest than their current White Rock home — to which they could escape when things get bad.

While you will never be able to predict with total certainty which of your ideas are truly worthwhile, and which are not, if you wait to ship, if you wait until something is perfect, if you never ship... one thing is absolutely certain:

The hotel industry loves to fill rooms up with things, which comes from the idea that a hotel room is an extension of your home.

In the beginning, we had no idea how to do certain things, and we were trying a bunch of stuff, some of which didn't work.

We've covered the idea here on Inc.com before, including write - ups of research on how fast robots are replacing jobs and in which sectors and an investigation into all the incredible things robots are capable of doing these days.

The most important things are the strength of your idea, your will to get it done and the talent and commitment of your people — all of which you can find and foster wherever you wish to be.

«It was this idea of the way this (user interface) worked that I think people were attracted to and that helped further it, and then massive marketing budgets, which is the way a lot of things happen.»

The first thing I do for competitor research is to make a list of all my competitors and put them through SimiarWeb in order to get a good idea of which traffic channel (s) they are doing well in.

Lot of entrepreneurs out there do not do the basic thing of documenting, channelizing and strategicing great idea which leads to disaster.

Because when you go to radical transparency, then people get to see things for themselves, which is, if they don't, they can't be part of that idea meritocracy, because it's not transparent.

This can be a useful thing because a lot of these ideas are great, the people are usually smart, and it is another tool to search for potential things in which capital could be put to work.

In the case of The Yard, which launched in Brooklyn in 2011 and was one of the original coworking spaces, the idea has been to keep things small, even as you're growing.

yo the thing is not about believing or not, is the fact that if we don't believe then we are worthless living garbage who occupy a space in the universe only to create crap and pollution, in that kind of case we would better be recycled into some industrial material for a better use than eating and living like cattle, but if there is a god we acquire a divine status and a purpose to continue to exist beyond afterlife or at least the idea of it, which would give life a sense right?

Similarly, those in the Church often have the idea that true sanctity means waving bye - bye to the enjoyment of life's good things, and learning to love things which are painful, boring, or painfully boring.

Even leaving out the idea I was also taught, that removing oneself from the system was a laudable act of counter-cultural liberation, with which I still have some sympathy, to teach one's children oneself, being able to choose curricula and readings and customize the teaching to every child's needs and gifts, is the kind of thing I was taught, by teachers of impeccable liberalism, to praise.

Thus his poems, which are ordered toward rendering the truth of things as they are, are quite different from his prose, which is governed by his consciously formulated ideas about how things ought to be.

Derived senses of fruitful exchange, of reciprocal sustenance, of welcome offered, of grasp and interrelationship, of a slender span of bilateral attention along which things are given and received, still animate the word in its verb form: we entertain visitors, guests, ideas, prospects, theories, doubts and grudges.

Stephen Barr criticizes me for confusing two very different things: the modest scientific theory of neo-Darwinism (which he defines as «the idea that the mainspring of evolution is natural selection acting on random genetic variation») and what he calls the «theological» claim that evolution is an «unguided, unplanned» process.

The magnificent national memorial now built on the spot where the 168 people died senselessly is my idea of the shape of tenacious hope, and hope is the one thing for which there is no acceptable alternative.

Since what I hear over an amplified PA system (kind of hard to «ignore» 70 db invocations in a mid size room, tbh) are things in the prayer I passionately disagree with, yet barred by prayer protocol to challenge the assertions of the prayperson (which such challenges to ideas are encouraged at public meetings) it sets up a «I'm not going to get anything accomplished unless I pretend I am one of them.»

The tribesman's idea of mana or of inherent «wonderful power» in things and the various taboos which apply to their use are an expression of such a belief in the supernatural.

It was in this ardent zone of growth and universal recasting that all that makes man what he is today was discovered — or at least must have been rediscovered, for even those things which had long been known elsewhere achieved their definitive human value only when they were incorporated into the system of European ideas and activities.

Or is the human race an infallible one so that any idea can be, move over should be, taken on faith of its truth no matter the reality of things and then acted on without concern of the real truth which was «WILLFULLY» overlooked?

One thing I can say with certainty, is that you have no idea which it is, so your story is not the «end of story».

Professor Hartshorne, who has much more to say on this matter, believes that «the Christian idea of a suffering deity» «symbolized by the Cross, together with the doctrine of the Incarnation» (C. Hartshorne: Philosophers Speak of God, p. 15 [University of Chicago Press, 1953]-RRB- may legitimately be taken as a symbolic indication of the «saving» quality in the process of things which despite the evil that appears yet makes genuine advance a possibility.

Since these are the things about which ideas of being were first formed in philosophy, it is important that as we refine our ideas we not divorce them from their place of origin.

In the case of religious teachers, the easy way out is often to teach things of which we have no idea, to give answers which do not satisfy ourselves, speak of things we have not heard, show things we have not seen.

At a recent gathering hosted by The Samuel Bronfman Foundation, which asked precisely that question, just about the only thing the group of leading Jewish scholars, writers, rabbis, and professors could agree on was that there is no longer one story, narrative, or idea that could hold the totality or even a majority of Jews together.

Bounded Sets and Centered Sets I ran into the same idea in The Shaping of Things to Come by Frost and Hirsch in which they talked about Bounded Sets and Centered Sets.

There are the various and sundry concrete green things: the abstract property at issue (viz., the property or characteristic of being green); and the mediative conception or idea of greenness which is the thought - instrumentability through which that abstract property comes to be imputed to those items that putatively manifest it.

5 In An Introduction to Mathematics (London: Williams and Norgate, 1911), p. 9, Whitehead writes: «The leading characteristic of mathematics [is] that it deals with properties and ideas which are applicable to things just because they are things, and apart from any particular feelings, or emotions, or sensations, in any way connected with them.

The idea of community is heightened by that, and individuality is dropped, which I think is a pretty good thing.

It is this latter idea, that the nature of a particular thing consists wholly in the universals which it exemplifies (and therefore can not contain intrinsic reference to any other particular thing), which Whitehead sees as the ground for taking solipsism seriously.

Seneca explains to Lucilius that the ideas of which Plato spoke were «what all visible things were created from and what formed the pattern for all things» (Letters 57:18, 19).

In the second chapter Whitehead introduces the idea of a variable, which is a letter that can refer to general things of the world.

Thus it conceives the world of nature as something derived from and dependent upon something logical prior to itself, a world of immaterial ideas; but this is not a mental world or a world of mental activities or of things depending on mental activity although it is an intelligible world or a world in which mind, when mind comes into existence, finds itself completely at home.

I once cite «Realism and Idealism,» the passage about objective idealism in which Collingwood clearly states his conception of the world of nature: «Thus it conceives the world of nature as something derived from and dependent upon something logical prior to itself, a world of immaterial ideas; but this is not a mental world or a world of mental activities or of things depending on mental activity although it is an intelligible world or a world in which mind, when mind comes into existence, finds itself completely at home.

Whitehead then identifies the leading characteristic of mathematics, not just of arithmetic, as that subject which «deals with properties and ideas which are applicable to things just because they are things, and apart from any particular feelings, or emotions, or sensations, in any way connected with them» (IM 2 - 3).

The naive concept of faith as blind assent arose from an equally naive and philosophically disreputable theory of knowledge, according to which one knows a thing best by detaching oneself from its use and setting aside personal biases in order to form an idea that corresponds to the thing.

Take them one at a time, spending as much time as you need to discuss thoroughly the issues and feelings that arise: «The ideas and issues which excite me most are...;» «The things that are most worth living for right now are...;» «I feel the most joy (pain, hope, lonely, together) when...;» «What I really believe about God is...;» «I feel closest to (most distant from) God when...;» «I get spiritually high when...;» «The beliefs that mean the most to me now are...;» «The beliefs from my childhood which no longer make sense are...;» «Life has the least (the most) meaning for me when...;» «I feel closest to you (most distant from you) spiritually when...;» «The way I really feel about the church is...;» «I'd like to do the following, to enjoy more spiritual sharing...;» «To enrich the spiritual life of our family, I'd like to..

If parishes begin to recover the idea of a sung Mass, rather than a Mass at which things are sung, that will be a great improvement to the celebration of the Liturgy.

Although scholars of the Revolution have disagreed on many things, the past fifty years have witnessed strong agreement that one significant aspect of the ideas motivating the American Revolution was the Whig or Country party beliefs which supported the Glorious Revolution and then resisted the growth of monarchical power in the eighteenth century.

Yet in our time there is growing concern that our lives may be increasingly threatened by the role of technology (tools, machines, gadgets) and technique (ideas and skills which enable men to control and manipulate both things and people).

They should also admit that they have absolutely no idea what God would actually want politically, as apparently he did not want equal rights for women and was fine with slavery, but politically those things went away... which most of us consider a good thing.