Sentences with phrase «ideas people too»

But we are not just problem solvers, we are ideas people too.

Not exact matches

For people with heart conditions or other illnesses, it is a good idea to consult a doctor and have some type of supervision before doing anything too drastic — especially extended day fasts.

The idea of Zenefits came from SigFig, which at its height had about 30 employees, too small to hire an HR person.

For writers and professional speakers like me, this means that if people are not disagreeing with you, walking out of your events, challenging your articles and ideas, you are playing too safe and not working at the edge.

«The idea of having too few great people is the single greatest risk that we face,» Norgard says.

Young people expect as much: Facebook, Twitter and other social media allow them to curate their lives, instilling the idea that products and services should be personalized too.

Quite honestly, the podcasters who start out only in a «studio» often end up abandoning the idea because it's too hard to get into that studio (and it's too hard to get people to visit you in the studio).

Many people say they can't commit to a single project because they have lots of interests or too many ideas.

Too many people put money away without having a clear idea of what they want their retirement to look like.

So they water down their ideas and their efforts so they don't deviate too much from what people expect.

EASTWOOD: So anyway, we did that and then I went to Tokyo and where they hadn't been too fond of Americans going there and filming, I sold the governor who was actually the mayor of Tokyo, I sold him on the idea that this would be a great thing for the Japanese people that didn't even know this battle even existed much less how tough it was.

«Perhaps counterintuitively, getting rid of cubicle walls, which provide the illusion of sound privacy, but actually make people less aware of the noises they create,» is a good idea too, he also tells NPR.

Too often agency people leave a meeting and immediately start venting: «That was a really stupid idea.

«So many people are focused on the Internet right now, the reality is that any great idea you may have, five other people are going to have, too.»

That's according to career advisor Erin Berkery - Rovner, who contends in her Quora answer that too many young people stick their heads in the sand about others» misguided ideas of their generation.

It's similar to the idea of encouraging people to do their own taxes before they get too unwieldy so at least you have a basic understanding of investments and your money and can have more fruitful discussions with your financial advisor.

People will donate, but try to be too fake or sound too insincere and they won't trust you, or your idea.

I am a one - person business, too, and while I have tons of ideas.

People pivot when it becomes obvious that their business plan is too complicated, will never gain traction, has no potential customers, or is just a bad idea.

Of course you need to have a decent idea, but way too many people don't stick with their idea long enough.

And when asked where the ideas came from, the company's executives always said something like «we see behaviors from our community and we try to build on top of them» or «I don't spend too much time looking at what other people are doing or not doing.»

Too bad that all seems to be a bit over your head regardless of how basic the idea of satire might be to most people.

Too many people are giving up something that they shouldn't be doing in the first place... that's not the idea behind the Lenten fast, but it has thrown the entire idea of fasting way off the cliff.

The typical person from an established church has too many ideas of how church should be done.

IMO the difference is how well a person can answer tough and probing questions and are they able to still think independently for themselves without falling to the idea of «so and so said, so I think that too».

Too often we've used the technological, economic, and even military power of Christendom to push Christian ideas on people.

Here's what I keep coming back to: The setup of Westworld — throw humans into a theme park where they can do anything, and they almost invariably do evil — is really compelling, but instead of diving into those ideas, we're following this ridiculous «robots are people too!»

Feminism is a vast umbrella that can be best summed up by the idea that «women are people, too.»

-- throw humans into a theme park where they can do anything, and they almost invariably do evil — is really compelling, but instead of diving into those ideas, we're following this ridiculous «robots are people too!»

Many of us Catholics have gotten too used to the idea that people should simply come to us because we have all the answers.

For you too, as for all lands, the struggle, the traitor, the wily person in office, scrofulous wealth, the surfeit of prosperity, the demonism of greed, the hell of passion, the decay of faith, the long postponement, the fossil - like lethargy, the ceaseless need of revolutions, prophets, thunderstorms, deaths, births, new projections and invigorations of ideas and men.1

But one person stated honestly that when the idea of sponsorship was first proposed, it wasn't too appealing.

Elsewhere in his book, Collins explains why Stephen Jay Gould's idea of science and faith avoiding conflict by staying out of each other's way — his so - called «non-overlappingmagisteria» — is unacceptable too, since it «inspires internal conflict, and deprives people of the chance to embrace either science or spirituality in a fully realized way.»

The idea here is very clear: If a person is nonreligious, then TM presents itself as being nonreligious, too, so as to meet him on his own turf; then it draws him to a «unified, monistic, cosmic God - consciousness» typical of Hinduism, never indicating in advance where he is headed.

These kinds of ugly theories have existed for far too long now and the people who perpetuate such ideas need to be called out and and seen for what they are; ignorant racists and hate - mongers.

The Episcopal church had too much money and power early in the twentieth century and, like the House of Hapsburg manifested in the person of Prince Charles of England (or I could make a bitter allusion to the Bush clan but will refrain), became dull - witted and boring without an infusion of mongrel ideas.

You could ask a Koran scholar or a priest or an imam at a remote place in Asia, and if you ask him what religion does Tony Blair converted to, you would have no idea if you don't know who that person is so that's 50/50 right there too and they would probably be surprised that they should know who certain people are to be considered religiously knowledgeable.

My take - Karl Marx's manifesto (albeit not 1500 pages) put a lot of ideas into people's heads, too.

I still can't really tell if the way you express ideas here is actually the way you would think about and express them, or if finding an extra-controversial way to express something that isn't too controversial is part of the art of blogging, catching people's attention and sparking discussion.

In the United States, IQ scores of «approximately 70» are generally considered to constitute a level of mental disability severe enough to preclude the death penalty — the idea being that the person in question's mental level is too underdeveloped for execution to constitute a proper «punishment.»

too many people today are allowing themselves to become bandits dishing out their idea of «justice» with no care to whom they are harming or the effect their actions will have on other families.

Clearly this activity will be taking place somewhere, because human existence is too problematic for people to stop searching for ideas and ways of living that will make everyday life meaningful.

Yeah, you believe all this nonsense written by people who existed 2000 years ago who had no idea that the world was even round because you are too scared to think for yourself and can't accept that the meaning of life is only what you make it.

Our ideas of worship are too often rooted in the situation of the people of God before the Resurrection and Pentecost.

«I also think it is valuable for people who are inclined to lay trips on congregations to see for themselves that they are far more complex than most of the ideas that are held about them — that many of the ideas about what is wrong with them are just too simple.»

The idea of laying burdens on people's backs that are too heavy to bear comes to mind.

But he was not too interested in Whitehead's God, nor in the idea that all individual entities from protons to people were subjects.

They say «I'm fine» and they [other people] have no idea what's actually happening at home and the abuser could even be someone who goes to church too.

Seems a bit too close to implying that the only god people should really believe in is the Almighty Dollar... an idea I believe to be just as abhorrent as religion.

I think the idea of Christian unity is too radical for some people.