Brock
identified agape love with the wrong direction of classical (patriarchal) theism in championing «disinterested» love, «dispassionate» love that includes no dynamic interrelationship between Lover and beloved and leaves God utterly unaffected by the creaturely response to God's love.21 Erotic love, by contrast, «connotes intimacy through the subjective engagement of the whole self in a relationship.»
Not exact matches
Agape is not the power to overcome dependence; it is the power to overflow in interdependence toward an other which is not something to be
identified with but which may be dependent and in need of the
love that overflows.
In his analysis, he found in Whitehead a concept of divine
love which lies in contrast to New Testament
agape and medieval amicitia and which
identifies with Platonic eros.
But we may yet regard humanitarianism as a form of human
love which, though it can not be
identified with
agape, reflects human values which
agape incorporates and fulfils It is true that the Bible does not speak of a general fraternity of humanity which we recognize just because we are human.
At the same time it does not
identify agape with the form of any human
love, and it does not expect human
loves to move toward
agape in a direct and simple way.