Not exact matches
More acreage was converted to growing crops between 1950 and 1980, than from 1700 to 1850, and arable land is one of nine «
planetary boundaries» that scientists have
identified — limits past which humanity should fear to tread.
In essence, the
Planetary Boundary analysis simply
identifies Earth System processes that — in the same manner as climate — regulate the stability of the Earth System, and if impacted too far by human activities potentially can disrupt the functioning of the Earth System.
(2) Establishing the
Planetary Boundaries, i.e. identifying Earth System scale boundaries for environmental processes that regulate the stability of the planet, does not (of course) contradict or replace the need for local action, transparency and democratic
Boundaries, i.e.
identifying Earth System scale
boundaries for environmental processes that regulate the stability of the planet, does not (of course) contradict or replace the need for local action, transparency and democratic
boundaries for environmental processes that regulate the stability of the planet, does not (of course) contradict or replace the need for local action, transparency and democratic processes.
Our
Planetary Boundaries research
identifies that there are also other processes critical to the functioning of the Earth System that are so impacted by human activities that they, too, demand management at the global level.
Furthermore, it uses the translated
boundaries as benchmarks for EU environmental performance,, and offers a preliminary mapping of current EU environmental policy in order to identify possible entry points for mainstreaming the Planetary B
boundaries as benchmarks for EU environmental performance,, and offers a preliminary mapping of current EU environmental policy in order to
identify possible entry points for mainstreaming the
Planetary BoundariesBoundaries.
According to Lynas, Rockström and his associates — referred to by Lynas as the «
planetary boundaries experts group» — believe that they have
identified nine fundamental measures of the planet's ecological health that human development must not interfere with, if ecological catastrophe is to be avoided.
Despite his memorable description of the worst possible outcome of the Anthropocene as being «a Frankenstein planet stitched together by geological resurrection men» (p258), Morton's sympathies seem to lie closer to the Promethean scientists who seek to manage an unavoidable (and potentially even «good») Anthropocene, than with more precautionary scientists and environmentalists who use the term as a warning — a reason for humanity to pull back from scientifically
identified «
planetary boundaries» and lessen our interference.