In response, we then went on to give the standard free - will response: that the prima facie plausibility of this contention is deceiving, that while it may seem easy to
identify specific aspects of our present
system that it appears could be profitably removed with impunity, what the critic must do in this case is
identify another entire determinate natural order that would neither imply the present
evils, nor imply any similar new
evils, but still imply the goods that make human life possible.