Not exact matches
Since its implementation, the City has seen improved school outcomes in
graduation and attendance as well as a continued commitment to
identify and improve
low performing institutions.
While states under ESSA need to
identify for intervention only the
lowest performing 5 percent of schools, high schools with
graduation rates under 67 percent, and some unspecified percentage of schools in which at - risk subgroups are underperforming, the National Governors Association reports that «40 percent of all students and 61 percent of students who begin in community colleges enroll in a remedial education course at a cost to states of $ 1 billion a year.»
Whereas the schools
identified for closure experienced an increase of 6.5 percentage points relative to their projected
graduation rate, the other
low - performing comparison schools experienced an increase of 1.4 percentage points.
States must
identify low -
graduation - rate high schools using the four - year adjusted cohort rate; the statute is silent on the
graduation rate measure that should be used here even though the four - year rate must be used for goal - setting under the law.
States must
identify schools as «priority schools» if they are among the 5 percent
lowest performing schools in the state or if their
graduation rates are below 60 percent.
«Statewide, SSC students are
identified with more severe disabilities, are more likely to be placed in self - contained settings, and have higher dropout rates and
lower graduation rates than students educated in non-SSC districts,» the report said.
Although the study
identifies 16 states with
low graduation rates, it singles out Florida, Georgia, Nevada, New Mexico and South Carolina as coming under the Statewide Crisis Category.
States would
identify and support «priority» schools (the
lowest performing 5 percent of Title I elementary schools and Title I secondary schools, as well as secondary schools with
graduation rates under 60 percent) and «focus» schools (Title I schools with the greatest achievement gaps and secondary schools with the greatest
graduation rate gaps).
For the first time, the GradNation report analyzes data using new criteria established by the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA), passed by Congress in December to replace No Child Left Behind, to
identify low -
graduation - rate high school schools.
While we will need to be more prescriptive in
identifying, assisting, and allocating fund to the
lowest performing schools and schools with less than 67 %
graduation rate, it remains the intent to provide support and assistance to all schools and districts by leveraging the expertise and knowledge at the national, state, and local levels.
Examples include the delivery of the initial training and follow - up webinars on the Working Systemically approach in Texas, professional development of a Georgia SEA initiative to assist
low - performing schools raise student performance by building student thinking skills using Thinking Maps ®, design and delivery of professional development sessions focused on dropout prevention and increasing
graduation rates in Alabama, and the delivery of professional development sessions and dissemination webinars for an Early Warning Data System in Texas that
identifies at - risk students and connects them to appropriate intervention strategies.