Yet individually sales reps seem overwhelmed in responding to
these idiotic claims.
A wild claim about a 1 % change in albedo in the past decade and equally
idiotic claims about wind shadows in Antarctica in one post.
PC people see grandiose and
idiotic claims and want to point them to reality.
But as a reasonable and caring person I can honestly tell you that these poor fanatics and their embarrassingly
idiotic claims are, to me no different than any human being who has one shred of actual faith in the bible or any supernatural «relationship» with creator theology.
Religious people make fantastic, often
idiotic claims with zero evidence to back it up.
This is
an idiotic claim.
Of course Wenger has the final say, there is nothing to back up
that idiotic claim but hey... Everyone knows it so it must be true right?
The AGWScienceFiction fake fisics meme: «shortwave in longwave out» is
the idiotic claim that «no thermal infrared from the Sun gets through the atmosphere and so plays no part in heating the Earth's land and oceans».
Not exact matches
Claiming that it was the result of prayer is, once again, profoundly
idiotic and repulsive.
Your
idiotic excuse for your god is like an excuse for a husband who abuses his wife and then
claims «it's not my fault.
@ # $ Ing wrong... people like you are disgusting,
claim that we're idiots for our beliefs and yet, you present no ideas, you simply try to tear others down... well lets hear your «ideas» so i can destroy your
idiotic belief
Lol — no, but I do find it amusing that you find the need to defend your
idiotic rants with
claims about your education.
Stop hinging on
idiotic false
claims.
I will never consider it rude to state what the logical conclusion should be according to your attempted deduction, to demand a similarly logical deduction in support of any and all seriously made
claims by others, to call out the bullshit when someone fails to do so, or to respond to people behaving like idiots, making
idiotic statements or trying to argue without sufficient intellectual abilities, by calling them what they are: idiots.
Since many of us know one or more atheists who have served in combat unchanged, your
claim just sounds
idiotic, whatever brains you think you have.
But Arsene Wenger is a past master at getting the Gunners into the competition and then out of the group stage, something conveniently overlooked by the
idiotic Adrian Durham who, not surprisingly, chose to go on all out attack on Arsenal and our manager and
claim that the whole of Europe was laughing at us after a great performance in Monaco was not quite enough to see Arsenal in the quarter - finals.
If someone
claimed my cuddling and kissing my kids was incest I would just dismiss them as being clearly
idiotic, unless of course it was someone who could potentially remove my children from my care.
It's because of a social MORAY (How can it be that these midwives who
claim to be so educated, although the only formal education that MANA requires is a high school diploma, manage to continue to write the exact same
idiotic things?)
Now these
idiotic clowns
claim that it is a fundamental law of physics that there can only exist 8 planets in the universe.
Another
idiotic thing the author said was: what the heck does elongate a muscle even mean (apparently a Bikram
claim)-- because the author is well versed in physiology or anatomy or whatever.
So many sites that
claim to be free actually are tricky come - ons for you to drop money for stupid enhanced features like Blendr's
idiotic Superpowers.
HC tried to defend its
idiotic move and issued a letter to librarians in which it
claimed that if the current ebook lending system were left in place, the «emerging e-book eco-system» would be «undermined».
Ryanair are standing their ground: «If this ruling is not overturned we will have to consider increasing the infant fee from $ 20 to $ 40 to cover these
idiotic infant compo
claims.
It's only
idiotic fanboys that argue against it and
claim nobody cares about it.
Rather, I will simply observe that the pretense that Steve merely «
claim» ed that the data are not good enough is not merely beyond
idiotic, it, unsurprisingly, conveniently pretends that Steve's demonstrations of the methodological fallacies of «their
claim» are inconsequential.
Gavin Schmidt called the op - ed, «
idiotic», and Phil Plait of Bad Astronomy, in a reference to the discredited «Hockey Stick Graph»
claims the op - ed ignores the graph's depiction of rising temperatures.
It is
idiotic fiction to
claim, as AGW Greenhouse Effect fisics does, that the shortwave from the Sun converts to heat.
I'm not sure where she got that
idiotic idea, but she did quote from a scrap of legal text that Roger Pielke Jr has been carrying around that he
claims shows that the «rulemaking record» must show «the evidence relied upon and the evidence discarded.»
Comments from the floor ranged from defensive (the APA staff essentially said, «If we want to be a player here with psychiatry we need to get these guidelines out now»; representatives from division 39, psychoanalysis,
claimed unfair treatment of psychoanalysis and psychodynamic TX,) to accurate (the president of the Women's division strongly suggested that decontextualizing PTSD was dangerous to those who suffered from it,) to the
idiotic (sorry about casting aspersions here — but I am always fascinated when psychologists in love with RCTs and meta - analyses as the only viable evidence base stand at the mic and spout effect sizes etc. — overlooking the important contributions from qualitative research, and misunderstanding how RCTs are based on drug trials that simply do not translate to humans.