This is just
idle curiosity on my part (so not asking for further response), yet I'd like one chance to rephrase my question in the form of an assertion.
Call
it idle curiosity on my part.
This may be the result of more or less
idle curiosity on the part of the theologian, of the conviction that his authorities are also normative with regard to such matters, or of the belief that all truth is so interconnected that he must concern himself with everything.
Not exact matches
BE: I actually had a question of
curiosity about your work
on «Suddenly Susan,» but it's about the fact that you survived the retooling of the show, when Judd Nelson left and Eric
Idle came aboard and things got changed around considerably.
Usually a Shy or White - capped Albatross as it is also known, it comes sweeping in barely above wave height
on fixed wings, two metres from wingtip to wingtip, half circles the boat in
idle curiosity and then disappears into the blue beyond.
BTW as an
idle curiosity why not reverse the time axis
on the graphs so they run from 2012 to 1970.