Sentences with phrase «if isp»

By contrast, if the ISP had taken no action over the content of postings, it would not have had any liability in the defamation lawsuit.

If your ISP provides autoresponder services, there are only four things you need to do to start using the magic of autoresponders:

If your ISP suspects that you are indulging in spamming — sending too many resume to too many companies at the same time — your resume will be eliminated midway.

If your ISP suspects that you are indulging in spamming — sending too many resume to too many companies... Read More»

If your ISP's upstream speeds are awful you'll also from better stream quality using Amazon's servers.

If your ISP offers cable internet, you'll need a cable modem.

If your ISP did not set up Internet for you, follow these steps (assumes your modem includes wireless router):

If your ISP's upstream speeds are awful you could also benefit from better stream quality when streaming content remotely from one of the supported cloud services instead of your home server — assuming you have a decently fast downstream connection.

If your ISP likes to throttle your connection based on content (tanking your file downloads and / or streaming video speeds in the process) a VPN completely eliminates that problem as all your traffic is traveling to a single point through the encrypted tunnel and your ISP remains ignorant of what kind of traffic it is.

If an ISP with a warrant canary receives gagged legal process, it should obtain legal counsel and go to a court for a determination that it can not be required to publish false information.

«If the ISP is transparent about blocking legal content, there is nothing the [Federal Trade Commission] can do about it unless the FTC determines it was done for anti-competitive reasons.

US ISPs operate as virtual monopolies in many markets - even if an ISP was tracking and monetizing online activity most customers don't have any recourse.

Also, if the ISP - supplied unit has a Wi - Fi access point that some of your devices are connected to (say, your iPad) then that access point will no longer work and you will need to transition all Wi - Fi devices over to your personal router.

If your ISP's DNS servers are fast and you're located a long way from OpenDNS or Google DNS's servers, you may see slower DNS resolves than when using your ISP's DNS server.

If the ISP was prepared to cut off only the attacking functions and the command - and - control links from the ultimate attacker, we have a very interesting variant.

I was wondering if there was anything in the DMCA (or any law) that says that, if an ISP is notified that their subscribers are pirating content, ISPs must notify them, threaten to, or actually disconnect service, or anything like that which would require ISPs to take action against their customers.

I would be very surprised (shocked, actually) if the ISP kept a record of websites visited, going back five years.

According to U.K. magazine Web User, a recent study conducted by U.K. - based media law firm Wiggin and Entertainment Media Research found that only one - third of surfers would stop downloading copyright - protected content from the Web if their ISP sent them a warning letter.

If your ISP lets you choose your own DNS lookup — in Canada Rogers does but Bell does not, for example — you might like to follow the simple instructions and see if switching to the Google phonebook gets your internet calls answered quicker.

And it would be nice if the ISP also offers pre-installed WordPress, because it may also be time for me to move off Blogger.

Are you asking if an ISP in Saudi Arabia is required to retain «who browsed what» info for a certain minimum time, or prohibited from doing longer than a certain maximum time?

If your ISP went down tomorrow and you had to spend a week without the internet, then trying to three star every mission alone would give you plenty to think about.

If the ISP is not based in the United States, it may simply ignore the takedown notice and do nothing.

Also, if the ISP is not based in the United States, it may simply ignore the takedown notice.

A new survey has found that many people in Britain would not know what to do if ISP filters automatically blocked an online dating site they were trying to

The ISP can still glean a good amount by seeing every site you visit in the first place — and that encryption won't matter much if the ISP runs the site you're visiting — but it provides you some sort of buffer.

If an ISP practices the same policies, though, it's double - dipping — charging you monthly for internet service and collecting your data for ad dollars.

We mention all of this because you can choose the greatest web hosting service in the world, but if your ISP is putting some kind of limitations on your site, or trying to charge you unaffordable fees to reach a wider audience, your hosting service isn't going to matter.

If ISPs were the only ones that had to ask customers for permission before they chomped up data about web browsing and app usage, they probably would've made a stink about it.

First, as happened in Australia and New Zealand, if ISPs and content providers believe they can reduce costs by peering (i.e. not have to pay transit to exchange traffic) they can use this as a competitive tool to pass on zero - rated content to their customers, as opposed to those ISPs demanding transit payments to deliver traffic, which was particularly common when the countries could be reached only via one company, the incumbent operator.

Your other points about how they can (ab) use their position as the gateway to chip away the effect of encryption by laying various roadblocks (I guess the proverbial «stick» in the «carrot / stick» trope) seems like it could have some teeth if the ISPs really doubled down on this strategy.

If the ISPs had really focused on attacking it a few years ago, they could've nipped their surveillance competition in the bud, but now it's a harder problem for them to deal with.

If the ISPs had behaved a tiny bit more reasonably, been a tiny bit less greedy, or treated their customers just a tiny bit more respectfully, none of this would have ever happened.

If ISPs are held liable for their customers» behavior then ISPs would have a huge incentive to snoop into the activities of their customers, Stoltz said.

So if ISPs want to block websites, throttle your connection, or charge certain websites more, they'll have to admit it.

Not exact matches

«Those pushing for net neutrality think the world would work better if the Internet was somehow magically transformed into a public utility, like a water or electricity company, with the FCC and state regulators setting rates, overseeing investment, and micromanaging relationships between providers and customers,» Downes says, adding the result would be devastating to the smooth functioning of ISP networks.

Those ads could be super-personalized because the ISP can follow every URL you visit on its network and, especially if you stream its video apps, identify the kind of content you like.

An ISP could know that you visit WhiteHouse.gov, for instance, but it couldn't see if you visited, say, the Legislation page of the site.

If things like this get far enough, it could pressure more ISPs into making opting in the norm across the country to avoid a headache.

If you take them at their word, groups representing the big ISPs pledged in January that if the Obama privacy rules were killed, they'd voluntarily follow privacy guidelines that mostly take after the FTC's frameworIf you take them at their word, groups representing the big ISPs pledged in January that if the Obama privacy rules were killed, they'd voluntarily follow privacy guidelines that mostly take after the FTC's frameworif the Obama privacy rules were killed, they'd voluntarily follow privacy guidelines that mostly take after the FTC's framework.

If I don't opt out of its data - collection policies, my ISP could signify my traffic is coming from a mid-20s man who is in New Jersey and likes baseball.

The rollback of these privacy rules wouldn't be as big of a deal to people if they had a choice between an ISP that collects data en masse and one that makes it a point not to serve up targeted ads.

If they were to build out their ad networks further — and if they could get people watching their content services, which will be zero - rated — ISPs ostensibly would have the most powerful tools for advertiserIf they were to build out their ad networks further — and if they could get people watching their content services, which will be zero - rated — ISPs ostensibly would have the most powerful tools for advertiserif they could get people watching their content services, which will be zero - rated — ISPs ostensibly would have the most powerful tools for advertisers.

The rules are popular across the political spectrum, and even ISPs now have to pay lip service to an open Internet, even if what they mean in practice isn't net neutrality at all.

A court challenge to the rule by ISPs is anticipated, if only because they have sued before challenging regulations, but the opposition increasingly seems resigned.

Another is that data caps, which are needed for zero - rating to exist, are difficult to avoid if you also expect ISPs to continually invest in better network quality.

If you can't afford to pay an ISP to push your video content down the funnel, your potential customers have less chance to view your videos.

If the FCC were to implement rules that would do away with net neutrality, Internet service providers, or ISPs, would be in the position to make Internet «fast lanes» and charge for those multiple levels of service.

Hopefully, other states will follow suit, but even if California is the lone bellwether, it will make the free pass given to ISP's harder to use.

Not really, since ISPs with a large customer base or a commercial - customer focus can go for much, much more if consolidators are hot to trot.