We are still analysing if we will have to credit funds on each bitcoin blockchain or
if Segwit will be adopted as the main consensus and continue to be called «Bitcoin».
Attached was also a note that read, «Let's see
if segwit really is «anyone - can - spend» or not.»
For instance, it was suggested that
if SegWit was activated (and certain other changes were made to bitcoin in the future), miners would be able to steal the coins from certain types of addresses.
Bitcoin Core developers argue it's safer to wait and see
if SegWit works before rolling out transaction support within Core.
Hey @Coinbase,
if Segwit isn't even in the top 5 list of things your customers want, then why is «When is Segwit being implemented» the 2nd most popular question about Coinbase sent to the media?
On or after August 1,2017
if the SegWit activated Blockchain gains more hashing power, it is possiblle that the other chain created will get merged in SegWit activated chain.
The effective increase in block space availability would be greater than Davenport's 6 percent estimate
if SegWit transactions were used in that newly freed - up space.
Experts predicts that the Bitcoin price will achieve $ 5000
if Segwit is enabled on Bitcoin.
Despite all the recent hype, though, it's hard to say
if SegWit will ever activate on litecoin, even if it's close to doing so.
Bitflyer CEO Yuzo Kano, for instance, said he didn't know
if SegWit would be «sufficient» to fix the «block size issue» stating that he is «pro bigger blocks» because he believes it would make bitcoin more user friendly.
OTC trader Harry Yeh said that
if SegWit is enacted on litecoin, «bitcoin will be sure to follow», potentially removing any competitive edge.
Also,
if SegWit get dynamic, Bitxoxo may suspend all operations for 2 - 7 days for overhauling innovation and upgrading security,» Hesham Rehman, fellow benefactor and CEO of the organization, said.
«They know that
if SegWit activates on altcoins, it will make blocking it on Bitcoin even less credible.»
What
if SegWit and the Lighting Network can not be ready and adaptive to the demand soon enough?
If SegWit talks continue to develop and if the solution will, in fact, be activated in September as the rumors suggest, Bitcoin price is expected to surge in the short and mid-term.
Not exact matches
How else can it be explained that
segwit was merged into the code (even
if not activated) with practically no public debate whatsoever?
Now
if you pay BitPay merchants with a
SegWit transaction, you'll get the same smooth, fast bitcoin payment experience we work to provide to every user.
«I'm hopeful that
SegWit in concert with Lightning Networks (like Thunder) can help remedy a lot of the current backlog, but we won't know the impact,
if any, it will have until
SegWit is deployed,» Guzmán said.
Hope this article about Bitcoin Hardfork and
Segwit solution will be helpful for the readers to make a decision to deal with the event of Hardfork
if it happens.
Indeed,
Segwit will occur on November 15th and will probably cause a lot of trouble
if the hard fork is implemented.
However, after ignoring a lot of the demand for transaction batching and
SegWit for the reason that latter's launch in August 2017, it appears as
if the exchanges are lastly taking consumer suggestions rather more severely.
Within a 2 week period,
if 75 % of blocks signal for
SegWit, then it's locked it and will activate after 2 weeks.»
If more than 50 % of the operators and miners don't convert to the new BIP 91 software, there is a chance that
Segwit couldn't go through as planned.
While
SegWit should help reduce fees, once we begin rolling out this change,
if you incorrectly send Bitcoin Cash (BCH) to a Bitcoin (BTC) address, your funds will no longer be recoverable.
Pictured above is the new option for choosing the address type on Ledger Bitcoin Wallet IMPORTANT:
If you do not wish to use SegWit, or if you are not sure about anything, just click on the LEGACY button and you'll access and manage your accounts as it was befor
If you do not wish to use
SegWit, or
if you are not sure about anything, just click on the LEGACY button and you'll access and manage your accounts as it was befor
if you are not sure about anything, just click on the LEGACY button and you'll access and manage your accounts as it was before.
1/2 hey @CalvinAyre,
if you could add a disclaimer that you're funding CSW before spreading
SegWit FUD from a fraud, that would be great pic.twitter.com / cYPSfkJFXt
Using a
SegWit address is definitely recommended
if you plan to collect small transactions such as mining rewards.
If wishing to upgrade, Ledger users can recreate the same account naming and structure on the
SegWit branch and move funds from the legacy branch to the
SegWit branch by doing a normal bitcoin transaction.
Ledger will add immediate support for the bitcoin gold fork
if / when the code is available, with replay protection, and
if it's successful / valid — Bitcoin Gold will fork on block 491407 — just hold your BTC in a Legacy or
Segwit address before.
At the same time, efforts have been made to allay such fears, Blocktrail CTO Ruben De Vries commenting last year that
SegWit «is not very complicated
if you already know the ins and outs of the Bitcoin protocol.»
While
SegWit should help reduce fees, once we begin rolling out this change,
if you incorrectly send Bitcoin Cash (BCH) to a Bitcoin (BTC) address, your funds will not be recoverable.
«
If the
Segwit2x agreement fails to implement the 2x part, which is not entirely unreasonable, and only ends up being being basically
SegWit without the 2x, many miners will likely defect to Bitcoin Cash.»
For now, though, it will mine on
Segwit2x chain, though it said it «will immediately shift all company resources to supporting Bitcoin Cash exclusively»
if the block size increase part of
SegWit, scheduled for roughly three months from now, falls through.
In an official announcement, F2Pool expressed their support for
SegWit stating that
if support remains stagnant it would be counterproductive for bitcoin.
If you're still trying to wrap your head around what
SegWit is and why this topic has been so controversial, check out
, F2Pool expressed their support for
SegWit stating that
if support remains stagnant it would be counterproductive for bitcoin.
The project is an effort to improve the usability of bitcoin addresses and optimize address compatibility with
SegWit,
if and when it is activated.
If you're still trying to wrap your head around what
SegWit is and why this topic has been so controversial, check out this video, or this three - part Bitcoin Magazine article.
Proposed implementation
SegWit could also give users a leg up on security
if it reaches the required 95 % network consensus and is adopted.
Bitmain in particular has explicitly stated their refusal to implement
SegWit if it's not combined with a hard fork increase of the block size limit, and its pools — which include the BTC.com mining pool — have enough signaling power to block
SegWit's activation.
Bitmain co-CEO Jihan Wu, in particular, indicated he would only be willing to activate
SegWit if the Bitcoin Core development team also implemented a hard fork to increase the block size limit in their codebase.
At the rate Bitcoiners are espousing this upgrade, we won't be surprised
if we close the week with
SegWit - based BTC transactions culminating in excess of 50 % of all transactions.
Most of the other wallet providers contacted by Bitcoin Magazine also indicated they should be
SegWit - ready
if and when the soft fork activates, or not too long after.
If and when Segregated Witness is activated on the Bitcoin network, users will be able to take advantage of the added network capacity immediately — if their wallets are «SegWit - ready.&raqu
If and when Segregated Witness is activated on the Bitcoin network, users will be able to take advantage of the added network capacity immediately —
if their wallets are «SegWit - ready.&raqu
if their wallets are «
SegWit - ready.»
If activated,
SegWit offers a number of benefits, one of which is an effective block size limit increase to about 1.6 to 2 megabytes, depending on the types of transactions included in blocks.
And, the incompatibility between (covert use of) AsicBoost and Segregated Witness could explain why Wu was supportive of extension blocks, a recent proposal that appears to have little (
if any) benefit over
SegWit... except that extension blocks don't break covert use of AsicBoost.
If things had gone differently, users, mining pools, and companies running the BIP 148 nodes would have started rejecting blocks that did not signal support for
SegWit yesterday.
The extra space of 1 megabyte in the block can be utilized by the transaction only
if it is sent from a
SegWit address (output) to another
SegWit address.
If you support
SegWit on Litecoin, talk to your wallets and exchanges about supporting UASF.
He (or she) sent $ 1 million worth of the cryptocurrency to a
SegWit - protected address, challenging anyone to steal the funds
if they could.