Several experiments with the KOSMOS mesocosms showed that the smallest phytoplankton benefits,
if additional carbon dioxide is dissolved in the seawater.
Not exact matches
For his view, circa 1989, of a way for this age of methane abundance to play out without a concomitant and destabilizing
additional burst of heat - trapping
carbon dioxide, read here (I've sent a query to see
if he'd adjust this scenario at all now, and will report back):
So,
if we want reasonable odds of staying below 2 °C, there's only so much more
additional carbon dioxide we can put in the atmosphere.
If California continues «business as usual» (BAU), or without any
additional energy - savings measures, greenhouse gas emissions in 2050 are expected to nearly double those in 2005, to more than 900 metric tons
carbon dioxide equivalent.
If that is the case, the
additional carbon dioxide being emitted by China, India and other developing countries could bring a major
additional benefit: helping to protect wildlife habitats, enhance oceanic biota and preserve crop yields under sub-optimal climatic conditions.»
For example
if only 10 per cent of the permafrost melts, the resultant feedback could result in an
additional 80 ppm
carbon dioxide equivalent released into the atmosphere, equating to about 0.7 °C of global warming.»
If carbon dioxide causes warming,
additional CO2 should produce
additional warming.
«Overturning the «Consensus» in One Fell Swoop» gloats Planet Gore, which says the study «concludes that the Earth's climate is only about one - third as sensitive to
carbon dioxide as the IPCC assumes» and so we «should expect about a 0.6 oC
additional increase in temperature between now and 2070» [0.1 oC per decade]
if CO2 concentrations hit 550 parts per million, double preindustrial levels.