But don't be surprised
if asset class performance reverses one year out from now.
Not exact matches
If the returns for frequently and seldom traded art differ, there would be a disconnect between measured returns and overall
asset class performance.
We varied the holding period of the portfolios, varied the number of
asset classes in the portfolios, measured the
performance of actively managed portfolios that held more than one fund in each
asset class, and tested a subset of active funds with lower fees to see
if there was a meaningful change in the active fund portfolio success rate.»
If rebalancing is not periodically done, the allocation will drift - over time - to the
asset class with the best long - term
performance.
Next,
if you're comparing
performance to another not - T4 $ Model, then you should know that the chances that their returns have been linked to account for past investment vehicle changes, rebalancings, and
asset class weight changes are slim to none, and Slim left town.
If American Funds were to put these resources into actual money management, to have more
asset classes, more mutual funds, pay their managers better, and to get better long - term
performance; then there wouldn't be much reason to complain.
We wouldn't use it even
if it did, as it would have zero predictive ability when it comes to
asset class performance).