Sentences with phrase «if assuming»

And this inflammatory use of a «relative percentage risk» rather than relative risk or absolute risk... for example, even if assuming the writer's awkward data is valid, you can to look at infant living rates and see 99.6 % vs 98.4 %, which means there's only a 1.2 % higher risk of bad outcome from at - home birth than hospital.

It turns out that it isn't only the week of pregnancy, but also the weight of the baby that determines the chance of survival (if assuming that the child is healthy).

Since 2008, 51.2 % of NFL regular season games have gone «over» the total, indicating there is a slight trend towards «overs», yet not enough to cover the juice if assuming a normal -110 vig.

If we assume those permits turn into holes in the ground, Canada is putting up apartment complexes at the fastest rate since the early 1970s.

Yet, targeting $ 80 oil — if we assume that Saudi Arabia is doing that — has its economic reasons.

So the extra costs to the company (if you assume a Toyota partnership) are almost nothing.

If we assume that the square is a 1 x 1 unit, we can see that the base of the pink triangle is 1, the length of the square.

«If we assume that everybody sleeps 7 1/2 hours a night,» begins Aetna CEO Mark Bertolini, «then we have just over 6,000 waking hours a year.»

Equally, when a company that is burning $ 175,000 / month tells me they're raising $ 10 - 15 million it sets off alarm bells because even if I assume you'll double your burn rate it still implies 2.5 - 3.5 years of cash runway, which is too much for a startup.

If you assume 4 - 6 months to raise your next round then with a year of runway you really only have 6 - 8 months to show progress on your previous round of financing, which is why I prefer an 18 - month runway.

That didn't happen in 2014 and 2015; that is, if you assume Poloz said then in private some of things he is now advocating in public.

If we assume a 2 - year upgrade cycle, we'll have around 32 million people in the US with the Samsung S6 with Samsung Pay by the end of 2016.

«If we assume extremely pessimistic nominal earnings growth of 3 % over the coming decade and a compression in the price - earnings ratio to 10, equities would still deliver returns above current bond yields.

Indeed, if we assume that lower rates won't hugely recharge GDP ---- the CBO's traditional position ---- the numbers not only don't work, they don't even come close.

If we assume the tuition for the MBA to be $ 50,000 to $ 100,000 (not considering opportunity cost), then this amount of money could already acquire you the first 500 to 1,000 paying customers.

Even if we assume that Apple Pay accounts for three - quarters of US mobile and e-commerce spending in 2017, that would still leave $ 743 billion in Apple Pay volume that would need to take place in stores — or 13.8 % of total in - store retail volume, a $ 554 billion higher dollar volume than what we forecast for mobile payments as a whole.

If we assume a 2 - year average upgrade cycle for smartphones and growth trends remain the same, the global smartphone installed base will grow from 2.2 billion in 2014 to about 4.2 billion by the end of 2017, according to our estimates.

Even if we assume that all billionaires are college dropouts (hint: they aren't), that still results in a 0.005 percent chance of having dropped out, then of financial success after dropping out.

Even if we assume that Honest Co. had no intent to deceive consumers with its detergent, blithe assumptions about suppliers» actions put reputations at risk.

If we assume the average federal tax rate on capital income is 25 per cent (most capital income is taxed in the higher 22 per cent, 26 per cent and 29 per cent tax brackets), this yields a revenue cost of $ 6.6 - billion, or 7 per cent of federal income tax revenues.

If we assume they have a $ 100 value per lead generated, they have a VOAL of $ 0.013.

So if you assume that a person has contributed the maximum amount for their entire career, then you have to factor in that 401k limits have increased over time.

The CLC estimate is what you get if you assume that the only behavioural response to an increase in corporate tax rates is that firms» CFOs will grit their teeth and put bigger numbers on the cheques they send to the Receiver - General.

If you assume job flexibility means your paycheck will be smaller, be aware that data says otherwise.

Looking forward, even if you assume bond yields settle down, probably somewhere in last fall's range of 2.2 % to 2.6 % for the 10 - year Treasury note, this moderate year - to - date rise is still likely to inflict significant damage on parts of the market.

If we assume that Beijing has been reluctant to do this in the past, and is only doing so in response to weaker expected growth numbers, then it would suggest the latter explanation, which implies a higher, not a lower, discount rate, and so a lower «multiple» for the Chinese economy.

The company doesn't break down where panels are sold, but if we assume that half hit the U.S. market (145.5 MW) we can get a feel for how many customers will seek out a premium product.

If we assume capital turnover remains at 1.18 or same level as for fiscal year 2015, they would achieve an ROIC of 22 %.

If we assume 9 % compounded annual NOPAT growth for the next decade while the company maintains its 15 % ROIC, the stock has a fair value of $ 39 / share today.

If we assume that there are in fact 60 - 70 million empty apartments in China, and further assume that the average size of these apartments is 50 - 60 square meters and the average square meter costs roughly $ 1,500, then the market value of empty apartments in China is between $ 4.5 trillion and $ 6.3 trillion.

«If you assume that for many years China has been misallocating investment (by which I simply mean that the resulting increase in productivity generated by the investment was less than the correctly calculated debt - servicing cost)...» How about not «assuming» and offer proof?

So if you assume that the pattern holds, we are either in a secular bear market or we will get a large decline once we get a 2 % down day.

Given existing U.S. demographics, even if we assume an unemployment rate in 2024 of just 4 %, civilian employment would reach 157.2 million jobs in 2024, resulting in an average annual growth rate for civilian employment of just 0.4 % annually over the coming 8 years.

Finally, if we assume a sustained explosion in productivity growth to 2.8 % annually, joining the highest quintile of historical U.S. productivity growth rates for any 8 - year period, and assuming an unemployment rate of just 4 % in 2024, the result would still be real U.S. GDP growth averaging just 3.2 % annually over the next 8 years.

If we assume it's still early days of this ecosystem where Bitcoin can process seven transactions per second, then just how energy efficient and sustainable will it be as we begin to imagine scaling out Bitcoin so transactional throughput and volume can compete with the likes of VISA and its 24,000 transactions per second?

To get more specific, our dynamic DCF model shows that even if we assume OCLR's NOPAT declines by 50 % in 2018 and takes a decade to get back to current levels, the stock has a present value of $ 7.60 / share, a 12 % premium to the current valuation.

Senator Massicotte: If we assume a 10 per cent tax on all imports from the United States, would there be a major impact or would it be easy to adapt to the transition?

It can be thought of as the growth rate that gets you from the initial investment value to the ending investment value if you assume that the investment has been compounding over the time period.

But that was another step in the process of co-opting the English language because FINRA is not the financial industry regulatory authority, if you assume the totality of the financial industry.

If we assume that disposable household income is currently half of GDP, eight years of real GDP growth of 6.9 % and real disposable household income growth of 7.7 % will only raise the household income share of GDP to 53.1 % in 2023, a little more than 3 percentage points higher and still below its 21st Century average and leaving China as dependent as ever on investment and the current account surplus.

Based on the linear equation within, the stock is worth ~ $ 18 / share if we assume that GE can maintain its current ROIC of 3 % and not accelerate growth.

If we assume the market returns to appreciation matching inflation at 3 %, our portfolio is appreciating in value by about that same amount, $ 5,555 a month.

If we assume CALD can achieve profitability next year and reach 20 % pre-tax margins by 2019 (same level as IBM), it would still have to grow revenue by 8 % compounded annually for 25 years to justify its valuation of ~ $ 11.50 / share.

If we assume N can expand its pre-tax margin to 10 % in a few years and grow revenue by 21 % compounded annually for 15 years, the stock is worth ~ $ 25 / share.

Independent economists, such as those at Toronto - Dominion Bank, say Harper can only forecast balanced books this year if he assumes the price of oil will bounce back somewhat.

If you assume that a diversified portfolio of US Stocks, International Stocks, Small Capitalization Stocks, and some Bonds will significantly increase returns and reduce volatility you may be surprised to learn, that recently the stock funds are quite highly correlated.

Although the Madoff Trustee has not revealed the information as to the precise dates on which Picower withdrew funds from Madoff, if we assume that the funds were drawn out evenly over 25 years, and we assume that Picower had simply invested his stolen money in U.S. Treasury Notes over a 25 - year period, he would have tripled his money — giving him a profit from Madoff's crimes of approximately $ 21 billion.

Looking forward, even if we assume the unicorn growth rate slows to 20 % per year over the next five years, there will be more than 350 of them, with an aggregate market cap of over $ 1 trillion dollars.

So, if we assume that the room for capital appreciation is low, then it looks like I made a very inefficient investment by choosing capital appreciation vs cash flow.

If you assume the Fed increases the target rate from 1 percent to 1.25 percent at that point, the average effective rate for the month of December will be: