Sentences with phrase «if atmospheric conditions»

``... a second - order relationship may be more likely (i.e. that cloud changes only occur with GCR changes if atmospheric conditions are suitable).

The weather is sunny and cool, and should last a lifetime if atmospheric conditions remain constant.

Seeding clouds with chemical coolants could keep the games dry, but if atmospheric conditions are not favorable the process could also result in a rainout

Not exact matches

Just as fresh atmospheric conditions mean that the ice surface must first be tested afresh to see if it can be judged as safe, so our knowledge and working conclusions must be continually re-tested in the light of fresh data to see if we may still trust ourselves to them.

Even if we don't have a lot of melting because of atmospheric conditions one year, the surface is more sensitive to any kind of input the sun can give it, because of the previous cycle.»

Of four common corals and algae tested, three still produced shells in conditions that mimic oceans if atmospheric CO2 concentrations reached 1,000 ppm.

«When we look at this critical assembly protein, CGL71, it's as if we are looking back in time to the era when photosynthetic apparatus had to gradually adjust to the changing atmospheric conditions of our planet,» Grossman said.

For instance, if scientists detect a cyclone - like hotspot on a far - off exoplanet, they may be able to estimate storm activity and general atmospheric conditions across the entire planet.

The paper's conclusions are based on atmospheric conditions found in the Southeastern United States, and Graduate Research Assistant Hongyu Guo has begun a study of data from the Northeast United States to determine if the same thing happens elsewhere in the country.

As the authors point out, even if the whole story comes down to precipitation changes which favor ablation, the persistence of these conditions throughout the 20th century still might be an indirect effect of global warming, via the remote effect of sea surface temperature on atmospheric circulation.

There's a more serious consequence of being right for the wrong reasons: If there is a massive drop to well under 1M km ^ 2 and you interpret this as evidence of a tipping point, whereas what happened was a succession of 2007 - like atmospheric set ups, any prognosication will be shown wrong when in the following years the ice grows back and the condition doesn't maintain itself.

De Selby makes no attempt to explain why a «dark place» such as a cellar need be dark and does not define the atmospheric, physical or mineral conditions which must prevail uniformly in all such places if the theory is to stand.

The 2.3 W / m2 number is radiative forcing with respect to atmospheric conditions in 1750, and it would be roughly the imbalance you would get instantly if you swapped in present day CO2 concentrations etc..

Or maybe they're referring to a future pH < 7 state, but I read recently something to the effect that a doubling of atmospheric CO2 over the next 100 yrs would only reduce the pH of the oceans by 0.24, so we'd be talking way, way into the future (if ever) before pH < 7 conditions should exist.

John Carter August 8, 2014 at 12:58 am chooses to state his position on the greenhouse effect in the following 134 word sentence: «But given the [1] basics of the greenhouse effect, the fact that with just a very small percentage of greenhouse gas molecules in the air this effect keeps the earth about 55 - 60 degrees warmer than it would otherwise be, and the fact that through easily recognizable if [2] inadvertent growing patterns we have at this point probably at least [3] doubled the total collective amount in heat absorption and re-radiation capacity of long lived atmospheric greenhouse gases (nearly doubling total that of the [4] leading one, carbon dioxide, in the modern era), to [5] levels not collectively seen on earth in several million years — levels that well predated the present ice age and extensive earth surface ice conditions — it goes [6] against basic physics and basic geologic science to not be «predisposed» to the idea that this would ultimately impact climate.»

You could help clairify things by answering the following question: If atmospheric layers A and B each contain greenhouse gases, under what conditions will we find that the rate of absorption by layer B of layer A's thermal emission equal the rate of absorption by layer A of layer B's emission?

The atmospheric circulation of a planet that has no zonal asymmetries in boundary conditions will remain axisymmetric if the initial condition is.

This means that if the regional model significantly alters the atmospheric and / or ocean circulations, there is no way for this information to affect larger scale circulation features that are being fed into the regional model through the lateral boundary conditions and nudging.

However, if present La Nina conditions continue, then Atlantic hurricane intensity will increase, and more drought will be in the mix due to cooler and drier conditions with less atmospheric moisture.

If the heat isn't there — no super typhoon will form, no matter how supportive the atmospheric conditions are.

Even if experimental observations suggest that the models get the averages roughly right for a short - term forecast, there is no guarantee they will get them right for atmospheric conditions several decades into the future.

David, Wouldn't you agree that if the seasonal and geographic distributions of atmospheric temperature, water vapor, and clouds distributions of climate model simulations are a reasonably close reproduction of current climate conditions, that atmospheric dynamics is not a major obstacle or source of bias in the modeling of atmospheric effects.

«Places like the U.S. Southwest — or the Mediterranean, or the mountains of Mexico — that are fairly arid and already warm, if you increase temperature in any of these places, then you really change the atmospheric conditions in a major way,» Williams says.

Also, Baggage Insurance will be of no assistance in case the insured person entrusted their property to a third party; or the lost item has been loaned, hired or entrusted to the insured person; if a person has not reported loss or theft to the Police within 24 hours of discovery; if loss or damage has been caused by delay, wear and tear, atmospheric conditions, or mechanical derangement.