Sentences with phrase «if authors do»

If the authors don't provide a solid physical explanation for why we should no longer expect to see the observed quadratic trend we have been seeing since 1850 and instead expect no more than a linear trend after 2000, the paper would appear to fall flat on its face (at least as concerns its conclusions that climate sensitivity should be about 1/3 what the IPCC predicts).

Lulu ebooks will automatically become «private» (unlisted) if authors do not authorize a new edition without DRM, so they're giving their authors a choice.

Lessons from this year can create the next - year success formula if authors do their homework and figure out what the right direction for them will be.

And if authors don't like the way Amazon pays, they'll leave, and Amazon will need to entice them back with better payments.

But, if authors don't want to tackle those on their own,

But, if authors don't want to tackle those on their own, there are now plenty of companies out there which offer those services.

If authors don't take the time to read books on the craft, take writing classes, learn the rules, get critiques, read other books in the genre, take the time to research the genre's audience, write multiple drafts and rewrite scenes and sequences multiple times, etc. (I could go on, and on, and on...), the book will NOT be ready to publish.

There is very little money to be made if authors don't earn out their advances.

If authors do not need publishers to actually print and market books anymore, why use a publisher.

Oh and yes narrating takes a LOT of time and work, and because of that, most narrators (including myself) really prefer per finished hour if we can get it, especially if the authors don't market the audiobooks!

If the authors do well, the agents do well, and vice versa.

In fact, annual planning in January is so important that if authors don't do it, they run the risk of missing some career - making opportunities.

Actually, these two things (mobile technology and digital format books) are very, very much related, and if we authors do not have a clue about them, and how they work together, we are quite likely to miss out on half (if not more) of our potential book sales.

He'll make 2 sample covers and if authors don't like it, keep going.

If authors don't care about the quality of their book cover, it's easy to assume they also didn't care about the quality of their writing.

Here's the problem: if authors do their research, they may figure out that they should avoid Vanity Presses — although those businesses spend so much on advertising it's hard to avoid.

Apparently, Faleena is sending all authors a cease and desist letter while alluding that she will sue them, if the authors do not comply with her demands of changing the titles of their books.

In fact, annual planning in January is so important that if authors don't do it,... (more)

My second thought always hit like clockwork: If all authors do this, then damn.

In his online course, «Kindle Launch Plan: $ 1400 in 30 Days & an Amazon Bestseller,» Loper teaches his students how to build a foundation on Amazon and then successfully launch a book even if an author doesn't yet have a large audience of fans.

Also, even if the author didn't believe in a god and just meant «goodness» this would still, I think, be talking about a «faith» that good would win out.

If the author doesn't care to expand her readership to include people who prefer clean language, that is TOTALLY up to her; it's HER decision, and I respect whatever direction she wants to go with the blog.

Relying solely on self - distribution can be challenging if the author doesn't have the contacts at the retailers but is super easy if the author / publisher plans to sell the book solely online.

The problem is that reviews don't always turn into sales and sales, especially for books, will slow down if the author doesn't bring a new title out in fairly short order.

If an author did not make any changes in their Kindle Direct Publishing dashboard, there is a strong likelihood that the offending book was delisted.

If an author doesn't want the change, it takes a nanosecond to reject it — and poof!

I suspect that editors and advertisers will be the big winners, because they get their money even if the author doesn't sell one book.

If the author doesn't market the book, the indie house will lose its investment.

The author may also seek to negotiate the right not to have later editions published under the author's name if the author doesn't participate.

If an author does not have an agent it's advised for them to have the contract looked over by an IP lawyer.

If the author doesn't care enough about the book to put out a top notch cover, I don't care enough to read it.

If an author doesn't have a phone number where I can reach them, they are out of luck when a PR opportunity comes up and I don't ever go back, it's not worth my time.

Now, to be sure, if an author doesn't take your advice, you can mention the perceived weakness / fault in the review, but there's also no cause to say, «I warned her not to do this,» or anything of the kind.

If an author does decide to move a self published title from its existing platform, the new edition's sales page will not automatically pull up reader reviews to the old one on sites such as Amazon.

If the author doesn't promote and tell people about their book (a continual process) then the bookseller assumes no one will come in their store asking about the book.

But if the author did something right, or if I think they have potential, I mention that, too.

After all, how good can it be if the author didn't want money for it, right?

I almost wish self - published works would have a disclaimer if the author didn't care enough to have it edited.

If an author doesn't care enough to get the cover right, I figure he or she doesn't care enough to get the inside right either.

If an author doesn't appear to have any credibility, who looks like they don't even take themselves seriously, why should anyone else?

The producer went on to explain that her show incorporated a particular system of beliefs into all interviews, and if the author did not live according to that belief set, he or she wouldn't fit into the program.

What if an author doesn't have much funding for this kind of advertising?

What's more, if the author doesn't care enough to present a polished book description, will she care enough to make sure the facts in a nonfiction book are accurate?

But if the author does a rant (like one of mine did on a Sat Spotlight) I agree it can give them bad PR.

If an author didn't pay for a professional cover designer, chances are he didn't pay for a good editor.

If an author doesn't earn out their advance, they are far less likely to get another one (except for the mega-bestsellers who, as you say, are really just getting lump - sum payments rather than being paid royalties)

Chuck is the mystery around which this novel circles, but it almost feels as if the author doesn't realize that, because he devotes most of the novel to Hans.

B&N whatever at a cheaper price than on Amazon and if the author doesn't change it then their books will be pulled from the Amazon Kindle store.

Sometimes this can be attributed to following the twists of a turning plot, or understanding the explanation of complex instructions; but at times it reads as if the author doesn't know the correct usage of the words.

Penguin says it will pursue legal action if the author doesn't return the balance of her advance.