Sentences with phrase «if authors read»

If authors read this it will save them a lot of headaches!

Actually, if authors read extensively within their own topic and genre, they can gain a wealth of market intelligence.

Not exact matches

If you're unsure about what your goal for the book is, read this piece about the mistakes that authors make when framing the results they are looking for, and how to better frame.

Milyutin said he would read blogs and books on education — and if he liked what he'd read, he'd get in touch with the author to learn more.

For example, if you know someone who loves to read, send an article or book review about his or her favorite author.

This account I started this year after reading about it from several different authors on Seeking Alpha (side note: if you are interested in Dividend Growth Investing and managing your retirement portfolio you HAVE to check out this site, it's one of my main sources for stock research).

Google has confirmed that there's a hidden benefit to having authorship status: If a user returns to the search results after reading an author - tagged search result for a certain period of time, Google will add three additional links to similar articles from the same author below the originally clicked link.

Oh, and he is also an active real estate investor, entrepreneur, traveler, third - person speaker, husband, and author of «The Book on Investing in Real Estate with No (and Low) Money Down ``, and «The Book on Rental Property Investing» which you should probably read if you want to do more deals.

Read my most popular blog posts: How to Stop Procrastinating and Finish What You Start Five Life Lessons I learned From an Old Job An Author's Shortcut to Fame How to Recover from Grief Interview with Brian Swift (If you lack motivation, watch this short interview)

If you'd like to see a sample of the author's work navigate to http://www.oddballstocks.com and begin reading.

I will find it surprising if a person that has read the Bible, agrees with the author's views in this article.

@Margroks If you actually read the post, you'll see that no where in the text does the author state that Bin Laden physically died prior to this past week.

He's complaining that I referred to a gay author, Jeff Miner who wrote THE CHILDREN ARE FREE (trey... if you havn't read it, do).

But you are wrong, champ, I have in fact read the bible and if you could suss out where I mentioned that a bible, in its content (a.k.a. all the sh.it you quoted at me) can say that its true all it wants, but to make something non-fiction, the author, at the beginning and the end usually has a forward and an appendix with multiple sources to back up the material its presenting.

However if you read the Bible you will become familiar with the will of the author..

Unfortunately if you read their own authors works, you see they are angry because their tactics haven't work as well in the «Muslim world» as it had in other countries & religious groups.

God is the author of the bible and I find it much harder to take things out of context if we read and study a book line by line and chapter by chapter.

One wondered which serious religious authors he or his brothers had read, if any.

Anyway, if you download one of these books and enjoy reading it, most of these authors also have other books you can read as well.

If the author is alive and reads these words, I express my thanks.

It was only obvious to me because I have read most of the books by Author B and was shocked to see so many of his ideas and insights being written about as if they belonged to Author A.

I would like to point out the fact that (and I'm sure if you have actually read the Bible you saw this) that each of the authors were «Filled with the Holy Ghost» when they wrote the Gospels.

I think the author gave you your answer in the article if you were to read it all the way through.

If you have not read the book, then how is it that you can emphatically conclude that «he [the author] does so poorly...» or that «he ignores much Scripture (some that he even point out throughout his book)»?

I would be mightily surprised if the author had hoped that every single person reading it would adopt his viewpoint in it's entirety.

If one reads the Prologue of Job without awareness of the author's intent to polemicize against a perennial but perverse notion of God, the picture that emerges is precisely the one the author attempted to confute!

If we only read authors we agreed with, there would be no books we could read.

Since the biblical authors tend to make reference to the ending, if I were going to steal Wright's metaphor, I'd prefer to characterize it as «living in the fourth act,» where you've read the first three acts and the fifth, and you have to continue where the third act leaves off, mindful that what you do must fit in with the ending specified in the fifth act.

Also, if you read more from the author of said article and his cohort you will find remarkable similarities with material on ND's sites.

However, if the author had read the book, they would have realized that the book does not make any mention of religion at all.

If with due attention to this difficulty one were to read through the works of particular authors most celebrated for their genius, it might in barely a single instance perhaps be possible, though with much pains, to discover a little.

I am not advocating what the author taught in his book and if fact I really don't remember much from it I read it so long ago.

After all, it may be argued, if God can meet you as you read, what difference does it make whether you understand what the author intended to say?

If you are reading a book written by the all - powerful, all - knowing, all - loving creator of the universe, wouldn't you expect to be stunned by the brilliance, the clarity and the wisdom of the author?

If people don't read what an author writes, publishing companies don't make any money.

But if you have time read it and realize that the authors of Christianity are the Taliban.

Instead of reading them through as if they were a continous narrative, I read them in parellel — and when you do — and allow each author speak for themselves, they are often saying very different things.

No one forced you to read this article, and the author isn't responsible for controlling your emotions and catering to your sensitivities if you're unable to do so on your own.

If we are reading the words of an Author, not an author, this self - demonstration attains an altogether greater significance, which in turn reminds us of its greatest: «And the Word became flesh, and dwelt among us» (John Author, not an author, this self - demonstration attains an altogether greater significance, which in turn reminds us of its greatest: «And the Word became flesh, and dwelt among us» (John author, this self - demonstration attains an altogether greater significance, which in turn reminds us of its greatest: «And the Word became flesh, and dwelt among us» (John 1:14).

A more literal translation would read, «To no one anything they said; afraid they were for...» It is almost as if the author of Mark had suddenly been dragged from his writing desk in midsentence.

I guess if you are going to believe in an all knowing, all powerful sky daddy, reading an old compilation of 60 different books from 40 different authors put together by a group of supposedly reformed pagans 1600 years ago would just be putting your faith to the test, I mean a person with faith needs no proof.

The article has been well written by the author and yes Sharia law is a sacred part of our text, If you want to know read the Const.itution and learn about this yourself.

And if you would read, I would be glad to give you a reading list of authors who build up cases that are irrefutable.

However, if you read the Bible with the goal of finding the author's intent then you use exegesis logic and the flaws are not found.

The imagnination will certainly fool you and the devil is the author of confusion so perhaps when and if the author can get enlightened and stop looking for loopholes in God's word and reads it spiritually then she won't be confused anymore.

God gave us this gift lets use it, you wouldnt keep a new harley in the garage if u had a license... Plan and simple S ^ E ^ X is from the Creator, IT IS talked in SONG OF SOLOMON,, if u read that book and study it the author (s) had a freaky side!!!

If these authors had read the entirety of the article they quote, they would see that I do not believe in a crossless gospel, but believe in the centrality of the cross for the gospel!

If one reads further one sees that this particular thesis is not only accepted uncritically by the authors of On the Way to Life but is regarded positively by them.

(If any one is in doubt as to the lack of clarity for modern readers in the King James translation let him read L. A. Weigle, The English New Testament (Abingdon - Cokesbury, N.Y., 1946, pp. 149 - 153) where the author lists nearly two hundred words in the New Testament alone that have changed meaning.)

If you actually READ the Bible, I don't care if it's the dainty golden edged pages, on the screen of your smartphone or what, Jesus and the authors of the New Testament epistles emphasize again and again and again the importance of living the Christian life in community — walking through life with other people, in * real * life, in * real * timIf you actually READ the Bible, I don't care if it's the dainty golden edged pages, on the screen of your smartphone or what, Jesus and the authors of the New Testament epistles emphasize again and again and again the importance of living the Christian life in community — walking through life with other people, in * real * life, in * real * timif it's the dainty golden edged pages, on the screen of your smartphone or what, Jesus and the authors of the New Testament epistles emphasize again and again and again the importance of living the Christian life in community — walking through life with other people, in * real * life, in * real * time.