Sentences with phrase «if climate change get»

They are already short of water in the north, and that's going to get much, much worse if climate change get much more severe.

If climate change gets catastrophic — and the world sees more than 6 degrees Celsius warming of average temperatures — the planet will have left the current geologic period, known as the Quaternary and a distant successor to the Ordovician, and have returned to temperatures last seen in the Paleogene period more than 30 million years ago.

Not exact matches

For example, if the government decides that climate change doesn't exist, «then we as entrepreneurs just got to get in there and and fill the gap and and create hundreds of thousands of jobs and make sure that» we're living in a carbon - neutral world by 2050.

Now, if you told me that getting Isreal to convert would reverse global climate change, I might be interested.

«It's really useful, if you get the chance to speak to your candidates, for them to hear that climate change is something that their voters care about and something that the Church cares about.»

If we get serious about climate change and push forward with our reclaimed energy economy, we are going to make a difference.

If your argument has been disproved you don't get to keep on repeating it endlessly (like climate change skeptics constantly do).

Although it will be incredibly difficult to ever match his contributions on the pitch, it's vitally important for a former club legend, like Henry, to publicly address his concerns regarding the direction of this club... regardless of those who still feel that Henry has some sort of agenda due to the backlash he received following earlier comments he made on air regarding Arsenal, he has an intimate understanding of the game, he knows the fans are being hosed and he feels some sense of obligation, both professionally and personally, to tell it like he sees it... much like I've continually expressed over the last couple months, this team isn't evolving under this current ownership / management team... instead we are currently experiencing a «stagnant» phase in our club's storied history... a fact that can't be hidden by simply changing the formation or bringing in one or two individuals... this team needs fundamental change in the way it conducts business both on and off the pitch or it will continue to slowly devolve into a second tier club... regardless of the euphoria surrounding our escape act on Friday evening, as it stands, this club is more likely to be fighting for a Europa League spot for the foreseeable future than a top 4 finish... we can't hope for the failures of others to secure our place in the top 4, we need to be the manufacturers of our own success by doing whatever is necessary to evolve as an organization... if Wenger, Gazidis and Kroenke can't take the necessary steps following the debacle they manufactured last season, their removal is imperative for our future success... unfortunately, I strongly believe that either they don't know how to proceed in the present economic climate or they are unwilling to do whatever it takes to turn this ship around... just look at the current state of our squad, none of our world class players are under contract beyond this season, we have a ridiculous wage bill considering the results, we can't sell our deadwood because we've mismanaged our personnel decisions and contractual obligations, we haven't properly cultivated our younger talent and we might have become one of the worst clubs ever when it comes to way we handle our transfer business, which under Dein was one of our greatest assets... it's time to get things right!!!

Judging by the lengthening queue of prominent Tories lining up to deny climate change, if we do get a Tory government in 2010, it will not be a green one.

The general belief of those who embrace the explanation of natural climate change is that if we wait long enough the world will get cooler again.

So, if we get climate change wrong there is a very real danger we shall see levels of mass migration as yet unparalleled.

In this presidential race, if you get the lesser evil you want, Hillary Clinton, you get the corporate militarism of the status quo — more economic inequality, war, and climate change.

«I think that art and comedy and humor — if you put those first, you might get past that emotional barrier, and have an honest conversation about climate change.»

«If we can get a better understanding of the climate in the past, of the consequences of climate change and of how it shaped communities, then we might be able to interpret the future of biodiversity under the current climate change scenario,» says Guénard.

If models of Southwestern responses to climate change are correct, Southwest U.S. deserts should get warmer and drier.

So, we are charting around, kind of, this wheel if you [will], [that you] see in the article these ideas that, well there is climate change, here is where the cliff looks like it might be; we are getting dangerously close to [it] biodiversity loss --[we're] over the cliff already on that one.

And if we really want to get serious about climate change and other environmental ills, we might consider taxing all fossil fuels, which are too cheap given the health costs they impose.

If the carbon that makes up much of the organic matter remains stored in the soil, then it doesn't get into the atmosphere where it can contribute to climate change.

So if researchers can chart the changes in the number of salmon that swim upstream, they can get an accurate history of alterations in the ocean — which gives evidence of how climate has changed over time.

«If, by the time the case gets to the Supreme Court, there is a Trump - appointed justice sitting on it, the odds of the [current Clean Power Plant rule] surviving there do not inspire confidence,» says Michael Gerrard, an environmental law professor at Columbia Law School who directs the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law.

If you were hoping to hear President and Mitt Romney get down on climate change at last night's Presidential debate, you were left unfulfilled.

But there is no mention of the support, if any, for research into climate change,» and «the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization... got scant mention.»

Scientists aren't sure yet if there's a climate change connection, or whether things will continue to get worse.

«If you understand the Keeling Curve, you kind of get the story of climate change.»

If you ask the average person whether in the long run it is climate change or an asteroid / comet impact that's expected to kill more people annually, you'll undoubtedly get some confused replies.

If getting sued over a little lightning has some scientists in a tizzy, imagine the risk for those who seek to change the climate in a major way.

Sanderman speculates that PNNL officials «are worried the grant will get zeroed out if someone sees that it lists climate change».

«If we had the basic knowledge to enable corn to grow at higher temperatures, then we've got a buffer to climate change.

«I do think there's an opportunity, if the president chooses to take it, to show leadership and get attention on the cost that climate change is likely to cause,» says Kevin Kennedy, who heads the US climate initiative of the World Resources Institute in Washington DC.

«Even more interesting is that as satellite measurements continue and so as the datasets get longer, we will be able to recalculate our metric over longer time periods to investigate how and if ecosystem sensitivity to climate variability is changing over time.»

Now, if by impacts, he means the impacts to ecosystems, etc., it seems unlikely that climate scientists jockeying for funding would be trying to change the topic of interest from climate science to these other fields (which I guess gets back to your point that funding self - interest would dictate continuing to emphasize uncertainty).

Patricia Espinosa, Executive Secretary of UN Climate Change which is hosting the Bonn conference, said: «These findings underline the rising risks to people, economies and the very fabric of life on Earth if we fail to get on track with the aims and ambitions of the Paris Agreement».

If we had launched the Triana / DSCOVR climate satellite ten years ago, instead of mothballing it, we'd probably have robust answers to the energy budget question, and we could get the ocean heat change by calculating the (total energy change)- (atmospheric warming).

If we can get climate models to more credibly simulate current cloud patterns and observed cloud changes, this might reduce the uncertainty in future projections

If things get too scary and even the insurance companies take fright, then the big daddy of all profit engines from climate change could be geoengineering.

Believe me, if global climate change gets that severe, pythons will be the least of our worries.

If I talk to a buddy on the East coast, I sometimes start talks about climate change by remembering a great time we had searching for trout in the mountains; on the West coast about the great times we used to have eating raw oysters off the beaches — things our children will never get the chance to experience.

A updated register of national expert climate scientists from across the key and relevant disciplines would therefore seem necessary and urgent if the developing country media — the interface with the public — are to have a fighting chance of covering and getting published / broadcast climate change issues from their national perspective.

Imagine, say, a bell - shaped curve based on the null hypothesis that climate change is not happening (and not having an impact on increasing extreme weather events), and there is this really long tail out to infinity; and supposing we get an off - the - charts category 7 hurricane in January, we still can not attribute it or its extra intensity or unusual seasonality to climate change, even if there is only a one in kazillion chance it might occur without climate change having an effect — that is, it is way out there in the very tiny tail of this null hypothesis curve that fades out into infinity — the tail that says, afterall, anything's possible.

His position on climate change is that if it gets out of hand, we can probably find a technical fix.

If this is what happens when rain fall is only a few per cent outside norms (assuming the southern hemisphere is not very far from the northern trend), what will happen when climate change starts getting serious?

A Climate Change State of the Union (World), if you will, where Obama gets on TV, tells the nation what is what in no uncertain terms and calls out the lies and liars before ceding the floor to a series of scientists to make this all very unambiguous to the nation.

If the time horizons on sea level rise and glacial melt are potentially very long, and polar bears probably aren't in immediate danger from climate change, what is the very simple rallying point that is both scientifically defensible and that can be used to get people's attention and pull their heartstrings?

If we can't get it right with tobacco, where there's no benefit to weigh against the toll in lives and costs, how can we get it right with fossil fuels, where the real - time benefits of affordable energy seem always to trump the long - term risks from climate change?

If it somehow becomes law and its provisions get carried out, will the bill matter in the broader context of global climate change and emissions trends?

There may be small but interesting time - variations in eruptions, but the record is almost entirely one of «noise» — if volcanoes could get organized they could be very important agents of climate change, but they aren't organized.

So those of us who are concerned about climate change, we've got to recognize that nuclear power, if it's safe, can make a significant contribution to the climate change question.

DR PETER COX: «2040 it could be four degrees warmer, the climate change could have led to big drying particularly in the Amazon Basin, that would make the forest unsustainable, we'd expect the forest to catch fire probably, turn into savannah and maybe ultimately even desert if it gets really really dry as our model suggests.»

Maybe if we can get a famous psychic on Oprah to say he is channeling Michael Jackson and Michael says that Americans have to take action on climate change... Heck it might be worth a try; --RRB-

If the judge does get it, he or she may start asking questions about how the equations are derived which will create more things to have to justify, and will remove discussion even futher away from the damage climate change is causing.