Sentences with phrase «if creationism»

If creationism is taught at schools, than I'm very happy that some evolutionary biologists take it onto them to tell people how it «is».

In all fairness, if Creationism is to be taught in schools, then Evolution should be preached from pulpits.

You speak as if creationism is not science.

I would hate to think of where we would be today if this creationism garbage had been adopted in place of real science further back in US history.

Billy... remember the road you are preparing... if creationism is «bad» for our children... then, teaching about any God is «bad» for our children.

Let's try another one: if creationism isn't true, then science isn't true.

No wonder the country is descending into international laughing stock and jobs created through scientific innovation are steadily shifting offshore when even those charged with educating your children act as if creationism has any validity in the science classroom.

Not exact matches

If you do Creationism you have to go through other faith's take on the creation of the universe as well and that wont give our kids the much needed brain power they need to get us out this funk!

Mr. Ham is something of an extremist in his views, and advocating a form of creationism that, if true, would seem to mean that God has deceived us by creating a universe that doesn't align with at least some of the causal relationships science has identified.

@Dee — if you want to convince us that Scientific Creationism is a plausible alternative, then YOU need to provide evidence or research for it.

If he had asked the question you're posing, then yes, I would agree that «creationism» should be taught under Religious Education or Religious Studies as it obviously does not fall under Science.

If all the people in the US who believe in creationism were «raptured» into «heaven», the average IQ in our country would spike.

I want everyone who acts as if this type of thinking is inconsequential to consider this: To accept creationism requires a complete disregard for carefully and elegantly researched scientific evidence, and 40 + % of people in America do so.

But seriously folks... So what if their owners still believe in creationism, gods and devils, heaven and hell, magical powers, Noah's ark, people rising from the dead, angels, talking snakes, and virgin births.

If, for the sake of argument, evolution is true, then creationism is false.

If this is left to stand, then the government can also FORCE religious schools to no longer teach creationism, government can FORCE religious hospitals to perform abortion on demand, government can FORCE a Catholic DIOCESE to recognize gay marriage, government can FORCE...

If you are against creationism that just means your mind can not comprehend how God and science are linked together.

If you want to claim that creationism is fact, the onus is on you to provide proof.

The pathetic thing is even if you could prove evolution wrong you would be no closer to proving creationism true.

We can make a prediction and see if the available evidence confirms or rejects the prediction; evolution passes that test, creationism does not.

He was saying that if people do that it would be just as insane as people trying to get creationism taught in science class.

A candidate isn't going to get anywhere with most conservative evangelicals if they support a woman's right to chose, or if the candidate supports strict separation of church and state, and maybe even opposition to teaching Creationism is going to lose their vote.

My favorite bumper stickers: «Don't pray in my school and I won't think in your church» and «You can teach creationism in my school if I can teach evolution in your church.»

Holding to 6 - day creationism makes good philosophical sense if you believe, as you insist, on Scriptural inerrancy.

When one looks at the myths of surrounding cultures, in fact, one senses that the current debate over creationism would have seemed very strange, if not unintelligible, to the writers and readers of Genesis.

You seem to think god allows» for everything and if that is so why did nt he just create this in the first place... evolution or «allowed» creationism... one or the other but not both... why?

Even if evolution is only a scientific theory of interpretation posing as scientific fact, as the creationists argue, creationism is only a religious theory of biblical interpretation posing as biblical fact.

To train one's children in the infantilism of creationism / I.D., (so called «intelligent design», which... if true... DOES N'T say much about the alleged «intelligence» of the alleged «Designer»!)

I doubt if a poll catches the fine points that many average respondents will put on these terms, «creationism,» «guided» and even «atheistic.»

This creationism crap would almost befunny, if it were not for the fact it is really, really sad.

3) True creationism has full respect for the unknown; science by itself is destined to explain everything away even if it is not bona - fide and complete (theory accepted as truth).

If you truly had an open mind, you would have no problem with creationism as a theory.

Belief in creationism, if the world continues to exist, will continue for as long as people believe the Bible.

If what you say is true then there wouldn't be a push to teach creationism (not founded on science) in schools.

If you believe in «Creationism» you are mentally ill and should not be allowed to vote.

If there were such info then not too many people would believe in creationism because of the evidence staring them in the face.

but if anyone believes in Creationism they can not be Scientist period..

If you want to have a scientific discussion of creationism look into some of the answers in genesis writings.

You can believe in creationism and be ruled by foreigners if that's you choose.

Bill is not saying that if you reject evolution you are scientifically illiterate (I will say that though), he said that if you accept Creationism you are scientifically illiterate (really can't be denied).

Rufus, maybe if you actually studied Creationism or the theory of «Creation Science» you'd understand what it really is before you attack it.

It does not matter to me if its Evolutions or creationism.

To believe in creationism today, however, is truly absurd, and shows that some people will believe in anything if they think it means they will live forever.

Basically if you believe in creationism, you believe in lies from a fictional story book.

Creationism is a failed concept because if taken to its logical conclusion it gives Man dominion over God.

And what if your kids learn both and say «Mom, I think Creationism is stupid, I'm learning evolution.»

Creationism = If you don't like years and years of research just make something up and call it FACT.

I want to learn as much as possible if I'm in school and that means I want to know the origin and basis for creationism as well as evolution and intelligent design for that matter.

So prof mom, If that is the case then Evolution and Creationism aren't even comparable.

If you want to fill your kids» heads with the fantasy fairy tale of creationism, fine I guess, but keep it at church where it belongs.