Sentences with phrase «if dribbled»

The problem goes back further then people think, I remember from the early seventies if we dribbled or did a individual play we was benched and those kids who were physical were chosen over kids with amazing skills,

We won't judge you if it dribbles down your chin a bit.

After all he has been a master right winger and even if he dribbles poorly, he can beat players with quick vision and flash pace.

Stfu and go support Chelsea if dribbling sideways and scoring penalties are worth more than finishing and creating chances

If dribbling or more serious incontinence doesn't resolve itself within a few days after the surgery, contact your vet.

Not exact matches

Well, what if at the next table there was a man, eating his sushi, ice cream, and pickle dish with gusto... and he told you, ice cream dribbling down his chin, «It's really, really good!»

If you find yourself confronting poor results — a dribble — or even if you are looking for new paths for growth in your company's performance, wouldn't your time be best served identifying and removing the kinkIf you find yourself confronting poor results — a dribble — or even if you are looking for new paths for growth in your company's performance, wouldn't your time be best served identifying and removing the kinkif you are looking for new paths for growth in your company's performance, wouldn't your time be best served identifying and removing the kinks?

And if you do have a sick baby, then you have probably watched countless doses of medicine dribbled or spit out immediately following administering.

If you wanted to water plants in your garden and you squeezed the handle on the hose nozzle and the water only dribbled out, you'd quickly realize that a kink in the hose was restricting the flow.

If you want to dribble you should do it in private.

If it hangs completely on emotions where we flop, dribble, and mumble it's just as narrow sighted as someone who reads Origin, Wesley, Calvin, and tries to connect to God through the intellect.

If there happens to be a small area that isn't holding together well, just dribble a tiny bit of honey over it and press it directly into the crust.

If using a food processor, pulse repeatedly while dribbling in the ice water very slowly.

im with you on that... even if we do nt wanted, wenger likes to play a cam in one of the wing to get more possesion... im on th more dinamic play with to fast wingers who have goals and can get the line to take the pass to our target man (giroud or other)... because of that also is that wenger need a player on the cf who can play holdup playing... but, if wenger continiue to play that way and demands a player with good technique and short pass, i thing he also need to go for a player with goals and more pace than ramsey... he play ramsey there because he shows that he knows where is the f * net and have the technique and pass... but he needs more pace and even better dribbling skills... in that case i would go for isco or gotze

We get ourselves into so many difficult situations because he tries to dribble rather than pass safely to a team mate or even blast it into the crowd if necessary.

Lillard / Gordon pick and rolls with Gordon's explosiveness and dribbling ability if Lillard gets doubled and 3 shooters on the perimeter all with some ability to make a play off a closeout.

Nothing you could ever do to Giroud would ever make him come good just nothing.Its not a formation set up that gets a player to dribble, score, be world class, be dependable, wow the crowd and the like.Its the players» own ability that makes him do that.Once you don't have it ya ain't gat it brother.Read my lips!!!!! Once ya don't have it ya ain't gat it.As simple as ABC.So I expect this to be another de ja vu case and waste of time if Giroud and Alexis are paired.I'm even shocked it's coming from Henry.He should rather be giving us more reasons why we need a new striker and why we would fail if we don't get the new striker.Forget Giroud's stats for a moment and judge him by how he plays when you are watching him.You would realize that given the same chances at Arsenal strikers who are not even world class can do better.I want a new striker even if not world class and to be honest its not necessarily a world class striker that wins you a league but just increases the chances of winning it.Peace!!!!

goodness i can't believe it people will still defend him.You know something when Giroud misses many chances like at Monaco i did not criticize him even based on that you know why?its because he has always not been clinical.The only way a team can improve is by indentifying its problems and solving them.Arsenal has Giroud as the main cf and Welbeck as backup to him.Giroud has done well scoring some goals some too important but collectively he does more harm than good.Do not use moments to judge a player judge him based on content.Giroud does not excel in many games than he excels in games.As a main cf you need to be consistent.I see people here saying Giroud can not dribble he cant do this he cant do that but its a bit crazy to criticize him for that because every player has his own style.Giroud limitations as a player costs arsenal and will cost us a lot.Most importantly his poor finishing which has cost us several times.Not good enough.His style of play is ok for us but a striker who can take on players and run behind defences very well would make us very strong and also should be clinical.For Welbeck he needs to works on his finishing and composure by doing the basic things right.He rushes infront of goal too much.For now he is just above average.However he can excel if he works on improving.Giroud and Welbeck will always be a pain in arsenal's neck for most part.Some will call me stupid but hey at least i want to analyze the problem.People may support Giroud or Welbeck to lead the line next season but as the saying goes if you fool me once shame on you but if you fool me twice shame on me.Will you let Giroud and Welbeck fool you again?

The guy is not a RWB nor is he a CM.Just by looking at how he plays you can tell he was made to be a winger.A wingback can be viewed as a defensive winger.He does well there because he's able to play like a winger.However, if you ask me he's terrible defensively.But I like the fact that he tracks back when he plays as a winger.At CM, he's able to do very welll because his passing and crossing is excellent.However, over there he's forced to restrict his runs and risk taking a bit because he's playing at the center.As winger he has full freedom to expres himself.Here, he can use his running, crossing, risk taking and dribbling to great effect All he needs is to develop that certain level of cobsistency.He can really come good because he's shown he can.

The guy has pace and really knows how to dribble, if you watch him play he really does remind you of a young RVP.

For me Sanchez is better than Hazard, Sanchez had impact on whole team, Cazorla and Ozil are tracking and defending, he led team with example, every Arsenal player is better cuz of him, if you going to compare 2 players you need to look all contribution, yeah Hazard has great dribble stats, but considering this is Sanchezs first season and impact he had, my choice and any reasonble man would be Sanchez.

If he does that and then tries to find space for shooting passing dribbling, to a decent standard, then he can overtake Iwobi.

If you ever watched Spain vs Italy (3 - 0) in their World Cup qualification match, you would see how Thiago, Silva and Isco dribbled, tackled, and chased their opponents around.

Arizona State will need his ability to rack up points off - the - dribble if its going to take out Syracuse in the First Four.

Jackson is also explosive, so if he's beat off the dribble, he's able to recover very quickly with a bit of help.

This is the sort of dribble that passes for analysis... Do go find a program on some celebrity show and watch that please, if you are looking for Wenger's love child!

But if Arsenal's season now dribbles to a sad close, that trust can surely be extended no further.»

And if he starts dribbling in circles with his left foot.

If he had been trained to use his low center of gravity better, increased his pace and modified his dribbling, he could have been up there with the Agueros, Sanchez's and Messi's... IJS.

I saw it as a very high dribble, in which case I don't think there's any violation if the player doesn't «palm» the ball.

he is amazing picking up balls in midfield and dribbling past two or three player but then his finishing lets him down If he could only learn to pass he would be amazing, he must remeber Arsenal plays as a team and Ox looks the lonely wolf

I believe Alexis has really shown the whole team that he will lose the ball occasionally, because a big part of his game is creative dribbling but boy if it's lost he wants it right back.

I keep telling people sometimes its not even abt the score lines its the manner in which we lose this games, players shouldn't be given 10 yrs to show they are good, now Lucas doesn't even make the bench no matter what he does, ozil will never be benched even if he strolls on the pitch an AM that can't pull the trigger only silky passes, Walcott a winger that can't dribble why does one club have so many flops?

The reason why we are arsenal and we're not winning anything is because how we volume and rate players on their ability and what they do on the pitch in the 3421 system Riyad mahrez would be our best signing of the summer if u don't believe me go on watching is games then watch ozil and Sanchez you would see is creativity passing dribbling shooting an ability to take on defender which ozil an Sanchez.

This is because, naturally, he tends to expect a fullback to overlap, so he dribbles in the knowledge that if things go south, he can reverse the ball back down the edge of the box for the fullback to cross.

It could be quick passing, it could be an amazing dribble or a fierce shot and all that would have been stopped if the defense did nt loose shape, or if the midfield came to help, or if the right back threw himself at the ball, or if the goalie was better etc, etc...

After seeing a couple of games where he featured and also the one for england he's got it all for me... 1) He has the physical ability to offer the kind of game that our Giroud offers (back to the net: deflecting, relaying passes and 1 - 2 touches) but also 2) Pace, mobility and technical agility to offer so much more: dribbling past opponents (creating space), running / turning over defences either to lay down the killing pass to a better placed player or finishing a through ball from our over talented midfield and all that with speed and 3) Tactical awareness, willingness to defend players if asked (like the game Man U-Real Madrid in the CL) and could provide support not only in the air on corners!!

He's a bit overrated I must say.I also don't get those who are asking him to tackle well.The fact is he's not a good tackler.I fear Wenger has made him untouchable in our team such that even if he plays badly he still starts.I mean if people are saying he's not a DM in the first place then is he also a CM?If he's a CM does he have the quality to play along side a DM?These are the questions we need to ask ourselves.If he's a CM then he's good at distributing from deep and also up top but he can't hold thd ball in tight spaces or dribble which is very important.If he's a DM then he simply can't defend.That's why for us to be successful in the long term with him we need a hybrid midfielder or what I call a defensive box to box midfielder.

The only thing which makes our team unbalanced is playing the luxury item we bought called ozil.I thought he would need time to adjust to physicality of premier league so i supported him, but the guy hasn't improved he tries to dribble past ppl but runs into them somehow, tries to do showboating at unnecessary time which he fails to do miserably.And i see him giving too many back passes when he should drive forward.And the biggest reason i stopped liking him as a player is bcoz of his sulky attitude.No passion or drive for the club, as if he wanted to be at some other club and is just doing the job without his heart in it.He neeeds to be placed on the bench and make him work hard to retain his place.Ramsey and coq in middle with ox and sanchez on both wing and cazorla as cam will make us a more balanced midfield.

If only somebody could be bothered to dig up a years worth of his dribble and use it against him, in a court of law.??

But he does need to cut that out right now, if an easy ball isn't on and there are players around him he needs to not try dribble his way past and instead should boot it long.

OT: It looks like many of you on here believe that ST position is well equipped if walcott decide to stay and play as ST... Well let me put it like this WALCOTT is not a striker (maybe striker under study) what he has is pace and finishing that's all... we need a well established ST and not only a hot prospect... I can't see us break the like of Chelsea, RM, Barca, and Bayern with Giroud / Walcott unless we get a proper striker, all round one with good finishing and positioning with fair pace and dribbling skills... EPL title and CL challenge need that... Get real and don't overrate our players

A striker that can't run, can't dribble, can't head, on the up side he does have a great shot if they start moving the goalposts to row Z.

if walcott learnt to dribble if barcelona offered 60m for ramsey if xhaka learnt to tackle if giroud learnt positional play if iwobi acquired a football brain if perez played more... if donald trump became president of the united states... oh hang on a minute... yes its mathematically possible... so 4th place junkies can still knock on the french pushers door hoping for next year «s fix... pathetic

(when even Koscielny starts to dribble up front to make a pass, or when we have 8 + players outside their box passing side to side)- if no walcott or Ox, flanks are almost ignored as an option for attacking.

the guy can real a player with his speed and dribbling skills and hes not a bad finisher when it comes to his age hes decent hes British too so i welcome that with ease and hes In the Senior Squad for our National team If you want to talk about Quality So fair David Ospina is Quality Calum Chambers has been Quality Debuchy has been Quality And Alexis well do i need to say anything about his Calibre?

If anything, Messi gets all the praise because he can dribble and score the insane amount of goals he does.

He added, «You always think even if he comes on he can give you a little trick or a little dribble.

If u look at welbeck a chances in the penalty box were he is not already dribbling he has missed nearly most of them.welbeck was missing vs Chelsea giroud would have gave us the option to cross the ball in and cause problems for terry n Cahill.

He dribbles and crosses like you would imagine a championship goalkeeper would if they switched positions for a day.