Yet, I assert, on the basis of extensive evidence, that
if electricity consumers were asked to vote on whether the government should mandate that the share of electricity from renewables should be rapidly increased over time then a majority would vote yes.
Not exact matches
It's kind of crazy
if you think about it: There's no information sent to
consumers about when it's expensive to supply more
electricity and when it's not.
Consumers would likely enjoy lower power bills
if provincial governments welcomed more private investment in
electricity utilities, according to a new report from the C.D. Howe Institute.
Other similar things might be investing in supermarkets and «
consumer staples» (because
if your weekly shopping basket inflates, their shares and divis probably will too) or investing in healthcare as a hedge against future healthcare costs inflating or investing in utilities as a hedge against utilities bills rising (I've yet to buy any but I quite like the idea of owning enough ~ 7 % yielding Centrica for the divis to cover the gas and
electricity bills) or investing in travel and tourism companies as a hedge against holiday costs inflating.
On the basis of these interventions,
if government recommendations to PURC are accepted,
consumers will be expected to benefit from reductions in
electricity tariffs.
What's the point of electing Dems
if they go out of their way to put the people who have been screwing
consumers since Pataki's «deregulation» of the
electricity market back in charge of the PSC?
«
If government recommendations to Public Utility and Regulatory Commission (PURC) are accepted,
consumers will be expected to benefit from reductions in
electricity tariffs,» he said.
Most of New Jersey's
electricity comes from in - state producers or states not in RGGI, so there is little issue about
consumers continuing to pay for the program through out - of - state utility surcharges
if New Jersey departs, the official said.
Just like
if you are a huge
consumer of
electricity, the power company might investigate to see whether you're running a grow house.
While the era of
consumer - driven growth may be ebbing, the sheer size of the mushrooming global middle class, even
if it becomes an energy - thrifty culture, guarantees the need for far more
electricity.
So
if the world moves toward a system for tracking emissions, who is responsible for a particular batch of carbon dioxide — the company that mined and sold the coal, the power plant that burned it, the
consumer who buys the exported widget made with the
electricity generated by that combustion, or...?
Even though people without
electricity access often pay a lot for their energy sources, such as kerosene and candles — sometimes more than they would pay for the same service
if they had
electricity access — the upfront costs for off - grid systems may still be higher than most
consumers are willing or able to pay.
Transmission technology vendors say their products could save
electricity consumers billions —
if utilities were incentivized to invest.
The results echo a similar study undertaken by the Yale Project on Climate Change Communication, which found that Americans «support setting strict limits on carbon dioxide emissions from existing coal - fired plants,» by a nearly 2 - to - 1 margin — «even
if the cost of
electricity to
consumers and companies increases.»
If, despite having done all this and using realistic figures, you do actually benefit financially, then you are being heavily subsidised by rate payers, tax payers and other
electricity consumers.
The subsidies don't stop there either as many
if not all states pay residential
consumers retail rates for
electricity they «sell» back into the grid, as opposed to wholesale rates that utilities pay to other suppliers.
If a national renewable
electricity standard is nonetheless inevitable, it should not impose excess costs on businesses or
consumers.
If all the costs of generating nuclear
electricity are included in the price to
consumers, nuclear power is dead in the water.
Yates predicted the cost of
electricity could also go up for
consumers in Oklahoma as a result
if the legislative measures are made law.
If policymakers limit greenhouse gases too quickly, the price of
electricity and gasoline will rise abruptly, triggering a political backlash from both
consumers and industry.
In electric lighting alone, which uses 19 % of global
electricity production, IEA analysis concludes that energy needs could be reduced by 38 %
if the least - cost technologies were adopted — at no loss of service to
consumers.
If the real total costs of wind energy are considered, then it has been reported that
consumer electricity costs would increase significantly.
The
electricity they produce is used by
consumers, and
if that
electricity was instead produced by coal facilities, the emissions would be many times higher than anything coming out of WTE plants.
If companies or
consumers do not transmit
electricity through a grid - system or use
electricity they produced themselves, they do not have to pay the EEG - surcharge.
Firstly, ignoring the discriminatory nature of the arrangement, the Court noted that
consumers and suppliers were required to purchase certificates for imports of
electricity or had to pay a fine
if they failed to do so.
If you're concerned about energy use, it's a great city, as well, since Oakland is the number one
consumer of
electricity from renewable resources.