If emissions of carbon dioxide, nitrous oxide, and methane are all allowed to accelerate to 2050, they could cause three feet of sea - level rise by 2900 through thermal expansion alone.
If our emissions of carbon dioxide are causing the world to warm and lead into possibly difficult times in the future, it is important also to establish the upsides of such emission.
Not exact matches
Even
if the ambitious targets
of the world's biggest economies are met, and internal combustion engines give way to electric or other zero -
emission vehicles by 2040, the total impact on global
carbon dioxide emissions will be minimal, according to a new study released Tuesday.
And it remains to be seen whether natural gas delivers environmental benefits — such as reduced
emissions of carbon dioxide when burned — given that it in itself is a potent greenhouse gas
if it escapes during drilling or pipeline operations, so - called fugitive
emissions.
He also models the global warming that would occur
if concentrations
of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere were to be doubled (due to increases in
carbon dioxide and methane
emissions from dragons and the excessive use
of wildfire).
Imagine
if the world's two largest polluters unilaterally decide to cut
emissions of carbon dioxide, the ubiquitous gas responsible for the bulk
of global warming.
A rather straightforward calculation showed that doubling the level
of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere... which would arrive in the late 21st century
if no steps were taken to curb
emissions... should raise the temperature
of the surface roughly one degree C. However, a warmer atmosphere would hold more water vapor, which ought to cause another degree or so
of warming.
If these rates continue,
emissions of methane, a greenhouse gas 25 times more powerful than
carbon dioxide on 100 - year time scales, will increase 4 percent over the next decade.
Even
if the United States implements all current and proposed policies, it would miss its 2025 target by as much as 1.5 billion metric tons
of carbon dioxide per year — roughly 20 %
of the nation's total
emissions, according to the analysis published today in Nature Climate Change.
«
If all 40
of the facilities are built, their
carbon dioxide emissions would be an astonishing 110 billion tons,» Jackson said.
«It is very important to know the sources
of carbon dioxide in running waters as well as the processes controlling respiration and
emissions if we are to understand what happens when the environment changes,» says Erin Hotchkiss, researcher at Umeå University.
If your goal is to help reduce
carbon dioxide emissions, then maybe you should switch to LEDs now,» said Lixi Liu, first author
of the study and a doctoral student at the U-M School for Environment and Sustainability and at the Department
of Mechanical Engineering.
«
If ozone continues to increase, vegetation will take up less and less
of our
carbon dioxide emissions, which will leave more CO2 in the atmosphere, adding to global warming,» Sitch says.
«
If we charge the car from a clean source
of electricity and combine this with the lowest possible
carbon dioxide emissions during production, then the electric car will be revolutionary.
According to a report from Imperial College London, we are going to have to halve our
carbon dioxide emissions by 2050
if we want avoid dangerous levels
of climate change.
«
If all the coal - burning power plants that are scheduled to be built over the next 25 years are built, the lifetime
carbon dioxide emissions from those power plants will equal all the
emissions from coal burning in all
of human history to date,» says John Holdren, a professor
of environmental policy at Harvard University's Kennedy School
of Government.
Given those findings and the rest
of the improved understanding
of the climate system, the IPCC projects that
if carbon dioxide gas
emissions — the primary cause
of warming — continue to grow at the recent rate, the world would warm 2oC above 19th - century levels by the middle
of this century.
«
If there are no further interventions by these governments, expect to see strong increases in urban car travel and urban energy and
carbon dioxide emissions in China and India and elsewhere around the world,» said Lew Fulton, a co-author and co-director
of the NextSTEPS Program at the Institute
of Transportation Studies at UC Davis.
Adds Aronson: «We absolutely must control
emissions of the principal greenhouse gas,
carbon dioxide,
if we are going to preserve life in the oceans in some approximation
of the way it should be.»
By burying 60 percent
of its
carbon dioxide emissions deep underground, the 275 - megawatt FutureGen plant, to be built in Mattoon, Illinois, seeks to show that coal can be,
if not exactly clean, then at least cleaner.
--
If a reversal has occurred with respect to an offset project for which offset credits are reserved under this paragraph, the Administrator shall retire offset credits or
emission allowances from the offsets reserve to fully account for the tons
of carbon dioxide equivalent that are no longer sequestered.
If we embark on a path that is equivalent to setting
emissions to zero now (say by having a period
of negative
emissions in the 2035 to 2050 time frame), and call the sequestration we accomplish mitigation then mitigation can arrest climate change, make adaptation unneeded and bring us to a safe concentration
of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere as Hansen has pointed out.
But
if people were better at using less electricity, which accounts for 38 percent
of carbon dioxide emissions in the United States, the potential for reducing
emissions would be huge.
Stable atmospheric concentrations
of greenhouse gases would lead to continued warming, but
if carbon dioxide emissions could be eliminated entirely, temperatures would quickly stabilize or even decrease over time.
If the human population continues to grow, more pressure will be put on
carbon dioxide emissions — leaving future generations vulnerable to the effects
of climate change.
The letter notes that «Stable atmospheric concentrations
of greenhouse gases would lead to continued warming, but
if carbon dioxide emissions could be eliminated entirely, temperatures would quickly stabilize or even decrease over time.
«(B) international offset credits may be sold at a strategic reserve auction under this subsection only
if the Administrator determines that it is highly likely that covered entities will, to cover
emissions occurring in the year the auction is held, use offset credits to demonstrate compliance under section 722 for
emissions equal to or greater than 80 percent
of 2 billion tons
of carbon dioxide equivalent;
It would be hard to find an ocean expert who does not agree that global
carbon dioxide emissions must be brought under control — and quickly —
if we are to prevent the wholesale deterioration
of our oceans.
«
If one
of us [reduces our
carbon -
dioxide emissions], it doesn't make much difference.
Hogbom had, at the time, started to consider
carbon dioxide emissions from factories (simple enough
if you know, for example, how many tons
of coal each factory burns a year).
If human - caused climate change is to be slowed enough to avert the worst consequences
of global warming,
carbon dioxide emissions from coal - fired power plants and other pollutants will have to be captured and injected deep into the ground to prevent them from being released into the atmosphere.
Because everyone in this global community will be affected by climate change, it will be for our own benefit
if we manage to reduce
carbon dioxide emissions in such a way that global warming is limited to less than 2 degrees Celsius», says Prof. Ulf Riebesell, marine biologist at GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel and coordinator
of BIOACID.
The new finding offers a glimpse
of what the future might hold for ocean life
if society does not drastically curb
carbon dioxide emissions.
According to Hans - Otto Pörtner, co-coordinator
of BIOACID, marine ecophysiologist at Alfred Wegener Institute, Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research and Co-Chair
of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Working Group II, all countries would need to reduce their
carbon dioxide emissions drastically by the middle
of this century
if they wish to reach the Paris climate targets.
Writing in the Wall Street Journal, the skeptical environmentalist himself, Bj ¯ rn Lomborg, recently revealed a devastating analysis
of the EV's real
carbon footprint: «
If a typical electric car is driven 50,000 miles in its lifetime, the huge initial
emissions from its manufacture means the car will actually have put more
carbon dioxide in the atmosphere than a similar - size gasoline - powered car driven the same number
of miles.»
With
carbon dioxide emissions, running costs, prices and kit levels that position it shoulder to shoulder with the likes
of the Volkswagen Golf, Vauxhall Astra and Ford Focus, this Civic at last looks as
if it has the platform from which to deliver sales results.
The title
of the article is: «Even
if emissions stop,
carbon dioxide could warm Earth for centuries.»
* Scientists from the Carnegie Institution's Department
of Global Ecology have calculated that
if current
carbon dioxide emission trends continue, by mid-century 98 %
of present - day reef habitats will be bathed in water too acidic for reef growth.
According to the recent McKinsey report regarding the reduction
of carbon dioxide emissions,
if I remember it correctly, although these cars are initially more expensive (in terms
of purchase price), their greater fuel efficiency results in the fact that owners will actually SAVE money over a time period that makes the whole thing a very GOOD investment.
, makes it crystal clear, in quantified terms, that the
emissions of carbon dioxide from burning coal are a major part
of the problem and need to be addressed
if we are to make the necessary changes to address global warming.
If this 2 degrees Celsius warming is to be avoided, then our net annual
emissions of carbon dioxide must be reduced by more than 50 percent within this century.
Our activities are warming the world's atmosphere at such a rate that most
of our agriculture will be seriously dislocated over the next few decades — even
if we were to get down to business now and start controlling our
emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases.
If we eliminated
emissions of methane and black
carbon, but did nothing about
carbon dioxide we would have delayed but not significantly reduced long - term threats posed by climate change.
Last week I posted a «Your Dot» contribution from Raymond T. Pierrehumbert, a University
of Chicago climate scientist concerned that policy makers and the public keep in mind the primacy
of carbon dioxide emissions if they are serious about limiting the chances
of propelling disruptive human - driven global warming.
Even
if the Princeton wedges
of avoided
emissions were achievable, that would only stabilize annual
emissions, meaning the real heavy lifting — stabilizing the concentration
of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere — still lay far ahead.
In the interest
of disclosure, I'll mention a few: One occurs
if a new energy source puts
carbon - based sources «out
of business» and displaces them quickly, even without any cost assigned to
carbon dioxide emissions: In other words,
if the economic cost
of the new energy source is so low that it completely and quickly beats even the lowest - cost
carbon - based sources (even without a «
carbon price») and justifies investments associated with replacing the associated infrastructure.
But it's important to emphasize that
if southwest North America moves into a dust bowl by mid-century or later (PNAS Irreversible climate change due to
carbon dioxide emissions, http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2009/01/28/0812721106.full.pdf+html), there will be suffering closer to home, even for people on other parts
of the continent.
Even
if poor and rich countries agree, magically, to meet in the middle — at, say, 10 tons
of carbon dioxide per person per year (about Europe's
emissions rate)-- that produces a world well on the way to centuries
of warming and coastal retreats, even at the low end
of estimates
of carbon dioxide's heat - trapping power.
Anti-regulatory blogs and commentators and the McCain - Palin campaign made a push to publicize a 10 - month - old comment by Senator Barack Obama about the high cost
of coal burning
if and when a hard cap is set for
carbon dioxide emissions.
1:16 p.m. Updated There's still thinking in many quarters that
if the United States acts to restrict its
emissions of carbon dioxide, the long - lived greenhouse gas at the heart
of the climate challenge, the fast - growing developing countries
of the world will voluntarily follow.