Sentences with phrase «if everyone interested»

It would be a good thing if everyone interested in life insurance could compare policies as well as life insurance companies before making their final decisions to purchase their policies.

But with that being said, if everyone interested in owning a Priv by BlackBerry signs up for updates, that helps cover their «depending on demand» portion.

If everyone interested in this feature would get on the phone with Kindle support and let them know that landscape is needed — it might help.

Not exact matches

If a star performer isn't striving the way they usually do, or if they're cool as a cucumber while everyone else is stressing out, it could be because they've got no interest in how things turn ouIf a star performer isn't striving the way they usually do, or if they're cool as a cucumber while everyone else is stressing out, it could be because they've got no interest in how things turn ouif they're cool as a cucumber while everyone else is stressing out, it could be because they've got no interest in how things turn out.

So what we have here is a classic «social dilemma» — a situation in which everyone could do better if everybody held back, but any given individual (or in this case, corporation) has reason to act in a more straightforwardly self - interested way.

If the option rolls out to everyone, advertisers would have the option to choose what types of users see their updates based on factors like age, interests, and whether they use Facebook on their desktop or mobile device.

If someone is interested, you'll notice that they won't quite treat you the way that they treat everyone else.

In his case, they knew everyone from mommy bloggers to mass retailers would be interested if they knew Celebriduck's products existed.

But if the answer is «no,» it's in everyone's interest to understand this from the start.

It will be interesting to see if the industry and everyone else will be able to cook up something in 2018 to boost oil prices even further.

If everyone in your group knows each other fairly well, have each member think of potential passive income streams for everyone else based on their knowledge of the person's interests and assets.

And so for example, if you look at U.S. government debt, which is the one almost everyone always talks about, most people aren't sitting there worrying about how much debt does Amazon have, when you look at government debt, interest payments on government debt as a percent of GDP or as a percent of tax revenue, currently because interest rates are relatively low, are very low, are running half, literally half of what they were in the second half of the»80s and the first half of the»90s.

Everyone has a different interest, but the reality is if the big picture way of looking at things is hey there's too much debt then central banks are going to be forced to devalue their currency to finance that that you're probably going to want your money in something of tangible value as opposed to something based on that currency which is going to be devaluing.

Just wanted to remind everyone that Market Folly readers have an exclusive extended free 30 day trial over at Alphaclone if you're interested.

The Federal Reserve begins its two - day meeting on Wednesday, September 16, and everyone is watching to see if the central bank will raise the United States target interest rate for the first...

Not every ETF strategy is right for everyone — especially if you're interested in investing for beginners — so only employ strategies that you feel comfortable using.

In short, if these Christians stopped acting so antisocial they would have little difficulty getting along with everyone else, but they aren't interested in getting along, are they?

It wouldn't be as interesting a world as it is if everyone felt the same way and thought the same way about every issue.

By the same token, if the central bank reduces the interest rate to zero, investors will shift portfolios to stocks, everyone will feel richer, and consumers will spend more «which is more or less what happened during the past two quarters of putative recovery in the United States.

Anyone who imagines that freedom for the media will be established if only everyone is busy transmitting and receiving is the dupe of a liberalism which, decked out in contemporary colors, merely peddles the faded concepts of a pre-ordained harmony of social interests.

Helene, I respect your thoughts but if everyone felt the same as you and believed that their special interest group deserved special treatment as a show of tolerance, not much would get done.

Not to be simply disparaging to everyone, but it makes the discussion more interesting if the poters are more familiar with the topics being discussed, that's all.

If it's so awesome, why should everyone interested in joining it be subjected to fraternity like initiation rituals steeped in secrecy?

In a recent interview, Father Neiman told me what Otto had said to him early in their friendship: «It's wonderful that you've taken such an interest in my family's story, but if you really want to honor Anne, do what she wanted from everyone: «Live your life doing good for other people.

Because if He died for everyones» sins, and these natural disasters are ALSO Gods way of teaching us not to sin, then that means that natural disasters are basically Compound Interest on original sin, and that God doesn't keep his Word.

The interesting thing will be if the gay community will admit this or try to use this — and lump everyone together.

It does seem it could be an interesting world if everyone had his own god with the caveat that it was illegal or maybe at least socially frowned upon to have the same god as anyone else.

Ever since the motu proprio was published -(interesting, incidentally, how everyone now speaks of THE motu proprio, as if there had only ever been one of them)- and it was clear that the bishops hostile to it were not going to be allowed to get in its way, the battle moved to the next set of trenches: those dug by the increasingly desperate proponents of «the spirit of Vatican II», who had so far seemed generally quiescent in defeat, but who had in fact been looking for a casus belli all along.

We all have different eating styles (Arielle is a vegan, Naomi is pescetarian, Jess loves meat and Ashlee and I eat just about anything), so it's always interesting to see if we can find a place that everyone can enjoy.

Everyone already knows that hits and runs will come at a premium against the Cards pitching staff, so it should be interesting if our staff can turn the games into pitcher's duels.

we are the feeding club for Barca everyone knows that, nothing is happening lately because they are not interested in anyone apart from Belerin and if they really wanted him they would of got him, i think they will wait for another year or two for him to develop in to a better Player as we have seen in recent form his not ready for Barca

Everyone is developing their own car so if you ask for something which is against our interests, I will not go for it.

Even though AW said we weren't interested in bringing anyone in, if he is to ship everyone bar G - Rude & WellBack then maybes his got something cooking.

Everyone (if they are interested) will see that you are not being truthfull, either with the question or the «ghost reply».

Wenger said United were in contact with everyone they have an interest in so I wouldn't be surprised if he chooses them.

Every year, Bill Belichick makes the NFL world's head spin with little tidbits from «Patriots sources» about their interest in so - and - so, how they are going to trade all of their picks for Blue Chip Player X — and then he sits back, watches with satisfaction while everyone panics, and then drafts who falls to him in the first, moves up half a dozen spots if the MLB / DT of the future is dropping, or trades down.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

Arsenal makes it more interesting in the league i could say.They are full of youngsters and the team is performing beyond its potential, Thanks to Arsene Wenger.That's makes everyone to expect if these young people can defeat the money backed and totally experienced teams.

Well, if you believe everyone from ESPN to Football Italia, Roma are willing to answer that question, as they've reportedly shown interest and / or possibly contacted United about a loan move for young Memphis, with a possible option to buy.

Not everyone lives in a «4,700 square - foot Tudor home» or wants to, but without a doubt, more people, especially older people (like — * sigh * — me) are interested in having a room — if not a whole apartment or house — of their own.

Baby - led weaning isn't for everyone, and you might find that your little one is interested in the foods listed above but will only accept them if he or she is fed them.

(But if you want to discuss something that might be of interest to the entire Lunch Tray readership, consider posting it as a comment so everyone can see it.)

Not everyone can or will want to induce lactation, but if you're interested, we are dispelling a few misconceptions here.

It doesn't have to be all drudgery though if you use a little creativity to make it interesting for everyone.

Theoretically, standardized currencies, trade blocs and on and on could be a good thing if they were created and operated in everyone's interest.

Hasn't he already said essentialy - Can't be done!!!! Well it can be done, if everyone around the table isn't just interested in protecting their own interests and those of the dues paying members of the associations that pay them fat paychecks.....

If you live in a society that creates incentives and rewards innovation in a way that allows everyone to participate in economic opportunities and there is ACCOUNTABILITY in all levels then foreign interests and in extend who actually governs are irrelevant in the big picture of prosperity.

Everyone knew that if they behaved in the manner that suited the controlling interests, there was the possibility of sudden wealth and influence.

If you get above the waist with Senator Gillibrand and her staff, everyone on Capitol Hill knows there's not much interest.)

Everyone who cares about shooting and conservation and can vote should use these sites to find out where their candidates stand on shooting and if they're prepared to take an interest in shooting if they are elected.»