Sentences with phrase «if ffp»

Also, if we are saying that only money will win you the league then it is indeed sad and it reminds me of what I said a while back where if FFP is not effective, we may as well dispense with playing the 38 matches in a season and just get the club treasurers of each of the 20 clubs to turn up at the beginning of the season with a copy of the clubs latest bank statement.

If FFP was a credible instrument to stop debt it would have included debt in the calculations.

If FFP ever got their act together and didn't allow loopholes in their laws then Arsenal could compete on slightly more even grounds.

We may well be, but if ffp does get relaxed (because poor oligarchs can't buy teams and «invest» to turn them into world class outfits or because sky pays the premier league so much that the «others» are disadvantaged) then it will be the «whole package», transfer fees and wages that spiral up.

«IF FFP were run properly.»

If FFP finally is enforced properly we should be a footballing giant for years while the likes of liverpool, spuds and even chelsea try to catch up with new stadium developments.

Not exact matches

If you are ready to make your Entrepreneurial Leap, then start today by getting your Financial Net (the FFP) and start leaping until victory is achieved.

If you believe that all the money in the game means that there will always be ways of bending and breaking the rules then I guess the FFP thing was never going to work and when you see what has happened this week in the transfer market, with PSG paying something like # 200 million to sign Neymar from FC Barcelona then you could say that anything is possible.

if not for ffp they would have challenge PSG for mbappe and neymar

I think if a club breaches FFP they should be fined and stopped from buying players for two years.

this tells me that the financial prudence we have extolled as prudent for the clubs future and for the adherence to FFP is really a smoke and mirrors situation we need a striker (opinions differ to which one) we need cover for Le Coq (again opinions differ) and maybe we need one other in another area of the pitch, but if we don't get them we wont be better than we were this year and we wont move closer to the real glory.

Even if Besiktas were to somehow find a way around the FFP restrictions Liverpool would not accept a # 21.1 million bid anyway as head coach Jurgen Klopp wants # 32.5 million according to the Echo.

We have way over 200m profits spread here and there, we can match PSG or City this window because FFP will look at your books every two years so with next years expected profits we can match anyone in Europe, but it's rediculous to think two players can cost more than a club in the bottom half of the EPL I would think twice before I pay over 100M only if it guarantees me CL title

Even if it means disobeying FFP.

If Fifa rule that ffp is flawed in June then it will create a big question, as you suggest, as to whether ownership of AFC has to alter and embrace what Usmanov and Dangote could offer.

Come on mate everyone knows our club has gone threw a transactional period that we will probably never see in our life time again football has changed since the billionaires have come in we had to make the changes no other manager could of kept us in the top four while we had to change our whole structure I'm not saying wenger is perfect he does fustrate us all sometimes but were in safe hands and were going in the right direction not that I know a lot about the ffp but something is happening and every year we seem to becoming in a stronger position to what wenger is trying to achieve for our club we all know this is wenger last contract and even if he win the cl or the epl he won't sign another contract it just fustrates me that the way people act sometimes our time is coming even wen wenger leaves we will still have hope that we can compete for honours lets just enjoy beign arsenal fans and what will be will be cause wen in a very stable position and that is all the hope I need that our time will come in the future COYG

If he delays, and the FFP relaxing rule comes into effect, I can see another investor buying up Arsenal before he does.

May be Lewandowski (if Bayern can sell Bastian then they might sell Lewa also), May be Benzema (in case he is not in Benitez's plan), May be Aguero (If they are forced due to FFPif Bayern can sell Bastian then they might sell Lewa also), May be Benzema (in case he is not in Benitez's plan), May be Aguero (If they are forced due to FFPIf they are forced due to FFP).

Arsenal board thought that with the FFP rools salaries and signing fees would go down and all be equal, what with our new stadium with extra incom and new sponsership they thought we will do well without spending big, but unfortunately FIFA is droping FFP they can't control it like they thought Manchester City already saying they are not following rools this season and they are spending big eaven if it means huge fines

Those sort of wages would play havoc with Arsenal's «prudent» management, and would probably not even be possible under the new FFP rules, but the TV Pundit Ray Wilkins reckons that if Arsenal were forced to sell, there would be one silver lining.

I doubt Milan will have money for Ibra, but thats what happens when Fifa shuts down FFP, damn we wont have any striker left if we continue like this

Yes we owe the banks around 230 million it's a long term loan we pay back around 25 million a year, this season 2014/15 we ar going to turn ower around 330 + million And our outgoing is going to be around 220 million or less, this season and the next 5 seasons we will be malikng around 110 million profit a year, we had 170million in the bank in April which was confirmed by the club we have spent some money on players 70 + million leaves you with 100 million in the bank then in June we recived 3 new sponsership deal worth around 130 million (wether or not it was paid lump sump or spread across the season to lower profit margin that I haven't looked at) all in all we can spend ready cash ower 200 milion if we realy want we can spend double and more of that sum and we still be within the FFP rules becouse they look at accounts 3 years acumalation

Normally, with the amount of money available to them, getting a player from the French champions would only be possible for Arsenal if they were keen on selling, but it seems as though the FFP rules and sanctions from UEFA may be starting to bite on PSG a little bit, which may be why the manager Laurent Bland has revealed, in a Metro report, that there is little he can do to stop the club selling Rabiot.

I didn't even expect them to even do anything to PSG, so even a financial penalty would be surprising but if they smacked them witha CL suspension I would actually believe that FFP is something more than a way for the rich clubs to stay on top.

If the rumor of Ox # 35 million is true along with Welbeck Everton rumor of # 30 million then I think they will be sold and maybe Alexis if PSG interest is true and they can get around FFP rules to afford hiIf the rumor of Ox # 35 million is true along with Welbeck Everton rumor of # 30 million then I think they will be sold and maybe Alexis if PSG interest is true and they can get around FFP rules to afford hiif PSG interest is true and they can get around FFP rules to afford him.

but still run perfectly on our awesome club philosophy of self sustaining we would have a combined effort of # 20 + billion worth of owners backing us up in wealth proportions that the same as city owners, its nice to know sometimes that we just have the financial clout behind us even if we choose not to use it, maybe between the three of them they could pay off the stadium debt leaving us debt free, and running of our own massive resources, this under the ffp guideline is completely fine to do as it stadium expenditure and not directly investing in to the first team.

If he wants to donate, invest whatever then that's cool even with FFP.

Centerforward = Cavani — has incentive to leave with being 2nd fiddle to Zlatan and won everything in France — if PSG are in FFP trouble then we could get him for the cheap, i hear Juve are tracking him — some fans think he could flop, but we base our team around centerforwards unlike United - Falcao, we can get the best from him,

If they bring in someone like Pogba or Yaya Toure to replace Matuidi, Wenger should go for him, as PSG also can be in trouble if not respecting ffp rulIf they bring in someone like Pogba or Yaya Toure to replace Matuidi, Wenger should go for him, as PSG also can be in trouble if not respecting ffp rulif not respecting ffp rule.

Is it possible to spend that amount of money and still buy Sanchez in the same window without violating FFP rules, I really don't get it... But if PSG manages to get these done, Neymar, Sanchez, Di maria, Cavani in the same team will have a crack at the CL...

why take any chances with the golden goose and if its true that FFP rules are about to be relaxed it means the cornerstone of the boards argument around a stable long term business plan is now in shreds.

my problem with AW is that for years he resisted to buy good players because of a million or two difference from asking price today's market those players are worth triple, we could of had a great team with possibly wining the EPL twice and possibly semis or final of CL, if he had just spent the money in the bank, Chelsea are in dept around 850 Million pounds (possible the bulk to Abromovich) and same for Man - United and few more, we are the only club that is cash rich with funds available around hidden 350 million and more accumulating every season, how i know this because i look at their end of year accounts outgoings and income there is around 100 to 120 million less outgoings then income, we can easily spend 700 Million in the summer and we will be well in with FFP rules and only have 350m to pay in two years which we can with bigger and higher sponsorship coming any day now

UEFA is probably already investigating them over FFP, and I'm sure if they spend another 150m, there will be no wiggle room.

If it wasn't for FIFA FFP, I would think a move to Man City was on the cards, so we could go head - to - head with Chelsea for his signature.

For what I understand they don't, actually they are afraid of losing him on the free, and also with di maria, although both of the players are Great, they need to sell, if not the ffp will come for them in a year or two.

if there isnt any FFP....

Let's be honest, the manager has not used our vast resources very intelligently, especially if we're in danger of breaking the PL's FFP regulations.

In terms of FFP it is possible (if you have invested wisely) to sell a player below the headline cost and show a profit.

The re-written FFP rules say that if a club fails to meet FFP regulations and then offer to do a deal with Uefa then any directly affected party (which I guess means any other club in the same league that might qualify for Europe, or any club in any other country that is playing in Europe) can appeal against the attempt by the club come to an arrangement with Uefa to mitigate their sanction in a plea bargain.

If Monaco are allowed through, then FFP will probably mean nothing.

Indeed whoever comes fourth could launch the appeal against Man City if Man City is seen to be outside FFP and if Uefa doesn't throw them out of the Champions League.

I don't think there is much in there at all on the subject of bad - mouthing City, rather a couple of points about the FFP rules and how / if they will be applied and correcting your lack of knowledge on the history The Arsenal.

It will take years to implement an academy set - up that will see a strong representation in our first team but if it proves one thing then it's that the owner is serious about adhering to the FFP regulations.

After Wenger campaigned for FFP so strongly, how ironic would it be if it bit us harder than it did the financial dopers.

Clubs can make a loss up to a certain level but will fail the FFP Break Even test if they exceed certain thresholds.

You kind of have to wonder, if financial solvency isn't in the cards — and judging by the club debts, it could be a long haul — maybe the $ 7 million fine to UEFA for violating FFP isn't such a bad idea.

Stan Kroenke will only have to seriously consider investing if UEFA can't make the FFP rules work.

If they can't make the FFP rules stick (Arsene Wenger and many others have raised serious doubts and there's the legal issue of kicking clubs out of major competitions), Arsenal's problems will unravel, and they will need to consider their whole structure in terms of the direction the club takes.

So they've basically said there is an «option» on bringing him in permanently, but they won't say «the loan will become permanent» because if they did then they'd be in FFP bother.

Now, under FFP, if they exceed losses of 30m Euros (# 23.5 m) over a three - year period that includes the present campaign, they are liable to be sanctioned by Uefa.