That's why,
if film criticism is important to you, you find a critic whose taste seems to coincide more often than not with your own.
Not exact matches
Who else
films every practice and then sits through it all over again, so that
if a player is fool enough to question a single one of her
criticisms, Pat takes her right to the videotape in her office and stops the dang thing so often to prove she's right that it takes an hour to cover the first 10 minutes?
If so - then that's something to discuss, as it provides a direct comparison / contrast to the
criticisms of the
film.
One of my rules of
criticism is to never recommend a movie that has an element of time in the title
if it feels like it takes that amount of time to watch the
film.
Not sure I see the problem with a hyper - conservative agenda behind a movie once in a while... Yes, its not very classy, but I doubt you would providing the same
criticism if the
film had an ultra liberal, pro Obama, US military is made up of east coast «sophisticated» starbucks coffee drinking hipsters.
Overall, this is an extremely sharp video, and I couldn't agree with it more, particularly the part where Willems says: «
If you like movies, you should read good
film criticism.
If there is any one
criticism I could level at the
film, it would be that the humorous dialogue is simply too tightly packed in there.
Conveying meaning primarily through visual methods is usually preferable within
film criticism, but though the scenes may have appeared more artistic in their ambiguity
if they weren't interrupted by evocative narration, Dominik also grasps how such scenes would be received when loaded with Pitt's presence.
The incredible Shrinking Critic Joe Griffin ponders the future of
film criticism and wonders
if the role of the
film critic has become redundant.
The particular nature of Sargeant's
film writing has much to do with insisting on the material as less the object of
film criticism (
criticism, too, must undergo a thorough expurgation
if one is to think through underground
film and write about it), and more an attempt to situate it within a wider context of describing its performance upon the audience.
If you judge by the Internet, you'd probably think
film criticism, amateur and otherwise, is a healthy and thriving hobby that a large portion of society partakes in.
If you ask most people (a.k.a. the white male majority that covers
film criticism now and holds most of the power that drives the US
film industry to churn out the kind of crap it does every summer) what they think of Lincoln they will tell you probably something similar to what this anonymous dude wandering out of a screening just transmitted to the NY Post's Lou Lumenick, who then posted it as credible:
It's hard to go back and pick out a single moment that propelled me towards
film criticism, but I suppose
if I had to give anyone credit, it's the late Roger Ebert, who I grew up reading and watching on TV.
This is in part because when arts journalism is the topic of discussion today, it's often being discussed in terms of who is doing it (too many cis white knuckle - draggers like yours truly), or
if indeed
criticism — for our purposes,
film criticism — matters anymore at all.
Mise en scène,
if we choose to learn from the starkly different forms it has taken in the international history
if both
film practice and
film criticism, points us, I believe, in this direction.
With Wonder Woman back in the cultural zeitgeist (
if the most famous female superhero ever really left it), writer / director Angela Robinson's
film serves as a superhero origin story in a more literal and more literary -
criticism meaning of the phrase.
But what
if «Three Billboards» isn't about the redemption of Dixon, as I, and others, have suggested in our
criticisms of the
film?
If there is one
film to reaffirm the meaning of
film criticism, that seeks to define the inimitable bliss of true cinema, that holds a mirror at the world and asks us to seek out foreign — even dissenting — opinions, this is it.»
Even
if the rest of the discussion hadn't been painfully boring, this reinforcement of the «boys» club» mentality (which creates an immediate feeling of exclusion that any horror fan who isn't white / cis / male can most likely relate to), coupled with their approach to
film criticism (which I heartily disagree with), made it hard for me to take them seriously.
If you go back over the daily reviews of Pickpocket, Les Dames Du Bois De Bologne, Au Hasard Balthazar — an easy matter now that The Times has reprinted its
film criticism through 1970 — you will find, not disrespect, but such outright incomprehension that the reviewer might never have experienced, let alone understood, the
film.
The omnibus
film If You Were Me (Yim Soon - rye, Jeong Jae - eun, Yeo Kyun - dong, Park Jin - pyo, Park Kwang - su, Park Chan - wook, 2003) contains the most direct
criticism of Korean society in this festival's offerings.
It might feel personal, but at times it feels as
if cinema isn't worth it, that it doesn't matter how much time I spend developing projects, reading
criticism, writing it, making some experiments shooting, seeing
films... I won't ever be «good» at it.
If anyone knows about the ugly, back - biting world of narcissistic online
film criticism, it's us, and every other movie site you may frequent.
If you feel I'm overthinking and analyzing what is only meant to be a cute talking animal movie for children, welcome to
film criticism and please hang up your kid gloves.
If you are passionate about
film criticism and meet the membership criteria, we urge you to apply.
If nothing else all this end - of - year activity is a rebuke to anyone who thinks
film criticism is dead.
After getting out of
film criticism I picked up on a hot tip from a friend who said there was money in the mommy - blogging racket,
if I could swing it.
And
if the existence of an art form can be determined by the art
criticism to which it gives rise, then the best gauge of the cinema's health, today, is the quality of
film writing.
If you're familiar with any serious
film criticism from the past half century, you've encountered a variation on this argument before.
But
if we're going to give a pass to every movie that makes money, or hopes to make money, then there's no point in
film criticism at all.
If I have to make a serious
criticism about the
film, it's the poor plotting.
Correct me
if I'm wrong, Scott, but the way I remember it is that you wrote a letter to Variety complaining abouta survey of
film criticism that they published that didn't mention either David or me, two critics you were very generous about praising, and your letter inspired an editor there to invite you over for a job interview.
If great
films invent their own rules, reinventing some of the standards of
film criticism in the process, Bela Tarr's Satantango surely belongs in their company.
I love
film criticism and I love reading negative reviews
if the author makes compelling and well written arguments.
Fassbender recently brushed off
criticism by Hollywood writer Aaron Sorkin, who said «the world isn't going to care»
if he was cast in the Jobs
film.
Stunning is a word that is overused in
film criticism, but
if anything deserves that description, it's that.
If the intention is to understand
criticism of environmentalism, why not let a critic of environmentalism author the
film?