Sentences with phrase «if foods claim»

What that means is that if the food claims to be for puppy stage growth, it will have the minimum necessary amount of ingredients and nutrients a growing puppy needs.

If a food claims to be «Chicken Flavored» there is probably little of the actual meat in the product and instead digests, by - products and additives that offer no value are added so a detectable amount of flavor is present.

Choose quality food: if a food claims to include ingredients for joint support, keep in mind during the heating process of kibble these ingredients reduce in potency and may not be beneficial

Not exact matches

It also suggests that if Lumosity does intend to validate these claims, its games will be classified as a drug and must therefore be approved by the Food and Drug Administration.

For now though, if you see a probiotic — or a synbiotic — for sale at your local health - foods store, know that the existing research backing up its claims is limited.

If you are claiming Christianity as your faith then walk the talk... You cut food stamps??? but give tax breaks, really?

If you claim Hitchens was irrational in choosing to smoke / drink then you are also irrational in choosing unhealthy food.

So if you're looking to mix things up, check out our list of the biggest health food trends of 2017 — and tips on how to navigate their claims.

«What I heard from the development teams is that if you compare the materials directly, you can identify the alternative in some cases, but in a later food matrix, the differences in taste are hard to detect in most cases,» she claims.

«We now have scientific evidence to back up the claim that if you go a few weeks cutting down on junk food and animal products your tastes start to change.»

However if the food label claim is correct the Pizza Express Gluten Free Margarita I tested has an incredible amount of fiber and almost no sugars.

According to the Food Standards Code, a claim that a product is a good source of calcium can be made if it contains no less than 25 % of the recommended dietary intake (RDI) in a specified quantity — for milk, that's the equivalent of 100 mg of calcium or more per 100mL.

However if the food label claim is correct the

Food and Drink - Fall 2011 -(Page 58) > p PRODUCERS food law The Laws of the Label If you can avoid making vague or misleading claims on food labels, you might be able to avoid a class - action lawsFood and Drink - Fall 2011 -(Page 58) > p PRODUCERS food law The Laws of the Label If you can avoid making vague or misleading claims on food labels, you might be able to avoid a class - action lawsfood law The Laws of the Label If you can avoid making vague or misleading claims on food labels, you might be able to avoid a class - action lawsfood labels, you might be able to avoid a class - action lawsuit.

And if it claims the presence of a nutrient, a serving of the food must contain at least 10 % of the RDI.

Products were considered healthy if they were eligible to make health claims according to the proposed FSANZ Nutrient Profiling (Food Standards Australia New Zealand, 2007).

If a food manufacturer claims its product contains certain nutrients, it's making a «nutrition content claim», the use of which is regulated by the Food Standards Cfood manufacturer claims its product contains certain nutrients, it's making a «nutrition content claim», the use of which is regulated by the Food Standards CFood Standards Code.

Colors may be claimed as «natural,» but the FDA's long - standing position is that any ingredient added with the intent to color a food, even if the ingredient itself is natural, is an «artificial color» and may have to be labeled as such (21 CFR 101.22 (k)-RRB-.

Deem a food made from oats that bears a «gluten - free» claim in its labeling to be misbranded if the claim suggests that all such foods are «gluten - free» or if 20 ppm or more gluten is present in the food.

(3) A nutrition content claim about choline, fluoride or folic acid may be made only if a health claim about that substance is made in relation to the same food.

(1) If a property of food is mentioned in Column 1 of Schedule 1 a nutrition content claim may only be made about that property of food in accordance with this clause.

A food can claim to have been produced in a country if each of its significant ingredients originated in that country and all, or almost all, of the manufacturing processes also occurred in that country.

So if you're making a claim on a food such as that it will cure osteoporosis, you might want to have traffic lights mandated for those sorts of claims.

As a matter of practice, if a food can claim that it was grown in or produced in a country, it can also claim to have been made there.

(2) A nutrition content claim using the descriptor diet is a comparative claim if it meets the conditions for making that claim by having at least 40 % less energy than the same quantity of reference food.

Packages containing a nutrient content claim must include a disclosure statement if a serving of food contains more than 13g of fat, 4g of saturated fat, 60 mg of cholesterol or 480 mg of sodium.

Once nutrient profiles are established, nutrition claims may only be used on food products deemed «healthy», though two notable exceptions will apply: nutrition claims referring to the reduction of fat, saturated fats, trans fats, sugars and salt / sodium will be allowed without reference to a profile for the specific nutrient, provided the claims comply with the conditions of the Regulation; and a nutrition claim may be used even if a single nutrient exceeds the nutrient profile as long as a statement in relation to this nutrient appears on the label in close proximity to, on the same side and with the same prominence, as the claim (the statement must read: «High [name of nutrient] content»).

Health claims are generally not permitted if a food contains more than 13g of fat, 4g of saturated fat, 60 mg of cholesterol, or 480 mg of sodium.

While I believe all the issues on The Lunch Tray are worthy of discussion (even if some are a little sillier than others), and even though we've certainly discussed childhood hunger here and will continue to do so, any site claiming to be dedicated to «kids and food, in school and out» really ought to take affirmative steps to help kids with no food at all.

We manage to claim guilt for everything from the food that goes into their stomachs to the lower back tattoos they might potentially get in ten years if we don't monitor their every move.

If the legislation controlling baby food marketing was more transparent and democratic, people would soon realise that such highly promotional claims on baby formulas and foods are totally inappropriate and harmful to child health.

If it fails, the American Meat Institute (AMI) claims that an extra 1.5 million cattle would need to be slaughtered to meet demand for ground beef without the feared «slime» — also putting an end to the far more sustainable practice of using every part of the animal, at a time when we are trying to produce more food from less land.

(There are 17 new promotional claims on the table that could — if approved by Member States — appear on follow - on formulas, so called «Growing Up milks», baby foods — any product for babies over 6 months).

Para 17 A nutrition or health claim should not be made if it is inconsistent with generally accepted nutrition and health principles or if it encourages or condones excessive consumption of any food or disparages good dietary practice.

(Bravo to any parent or dietitian who can claim differently, but if you are like me and struggle with time, us dietitians do occasionally bring out the highly processed or fried foods like chicken nuggets, fish sticks, frozen pizza or whatever it is, as long as its fast and easy).

-LSB-...] discussion (even if some are a little sillier than others), and even though we've certainly discussed childhood hunger here and will continue to do so, any site claiming to be dedicated to «kids and food, in -LSB-...]

Half of whatever food you made for yourself is immediately claimed by your little person, even if he had his own lunch 10 minutes earlier.

Companies claim such a marketing strategy is not a violation, though these toddler milks (and complementary foods) come within the scope of the Code if they are marketed as replacements for that part of a child's diet which is best fulfilled by breast milk.

If you've been paying attention to the school food debate this past year, you've noticed the consistent barrage of negative claims: «Kids hate healthier school meals.»

If that food is unappropriated, you are perfectly free to claim it for yourself from nature.

«The logical implication of Cuomo's claim is that programs such as the EITC and food stamps for working people should be sharply curtailed, if not repealed.

The researchers are continuing to investigate factors that influence people's eating behavior even if they're not aware of them, particularly those factors that are under the control of food marketers, like package design and food claims.

If the pteropod shells «are dissolving as fast as the authors claim, the effects on individual physiology, behavior, and fitness, and hence on populations and food webs, are not easy to predict,» Lawson says.

If you see a health claim on the label, be VERY suspicious: The label's front is food marketing at its cleverest, designed to seduce you into an emotional purchase that tricks you with misleading claims.

Oh, and if you're one of those guys who claim they simply can't force themselves to eat the large amounts of food the process of mass building depends on, your point is valid but that doesn't make it a valid excuse to stop trying.

Still, we're not claiming that supplements are worthless in the process of building impressive bodies, we're just saying that it's unreasonable and almost ignorant to rely mostly on expensive supplementation to do the work — if you want lean muscles, food comes first, period.

Traffic light and front - of - pack labelling will only work if they are part of much wider restrictions on claims about food content and laws compelling companies to reveal hidden ingredients that may have an impact on human health.

One time I was arguing with people about parallel issues and I pointed out that if it was up to them (and many of them claim to be «scientists»), clean natural healthy food would have been outlawed and medication would have been ordained as the only legal sound food in this country.

If you claim a certain food is healthy, tell us how you know.

And if you're going to throw away grains (and legumes, another class of foods that trendy diets are maligning based on dubious claims that lectins, phytates, or other «anti-nutrients» are problematic), you're almost of necessity going to be eating a lot of meat.