Sentences with phrase «if fuel prices increase»

Not exact matches

If you want people to reduce their consumption of fossil fuels, you have to increase their price.

He said Parliament had expected no increase in fuel prices at all or even if there will be, it will be marginal due to the introduction of the energy sector levy introduced by the executive under a certificate of urgency.

Food production is likely to come under increased pressure in the coming years if fuel prices continue to rise and the world's population increases.

So, too, will the decision to freeze fuel duty for the sixth successive year, though if ever there was a time to increase the tax surely it was now as pump prices have fallen so much.

Nigerians had thought, as we were promised, that if only the price of fuel is increased to N145 per litre, fuel subsidies will be removed, cabals will be eliminated permanently and fuel scarcity will never come up again.

While we will do everything possible to maintain our prices, if fuel costs increase significantly at or before the time of the trip, it may be necessary to institute a fuel surcharge.

If you can swing the price increase, though, the V - 6 is a no - brainer option considering the similar fuel economy and increased power.

The light - weight MDX front - wheel drive platform, increases fuel efficiency and decreases starting price — perfectly fitting if you live where the weather is generally agreeable.

This means that even if a cost increase is imposed upon us by a supplier - for example due to an increase in fuel costs - and we need to increase the holiday price for all new bookings, we guarantee that a price rise will not affect you, if you have already booked your holiday.

Hey and if you don't already know the price of Petrol & Diesel fuel was increased by around 23 % last Monday.

If the U.S., for example, significantly increased transportation fuel prices, then this action would both increase our influence in pushing for good international deals, and exempt us from charges of obstruction when we refuse to sign a bad one.

Common IPCC scenarios rely on an increasing supply of fossil fuels, yet we know that this is not possible and that production will soon peak (if not already) while prices rise in response, as they are doing already.

If we couple it to the expected market driven increases in fossil fuel prices over the next 86 years global warming is much much easier to solve.

The report argues that, even if electricity demand were to grow at around 1 to 1.5 per cent per annum between 2010 and 2020 and fossil fuel prices were to remain relatively high, the share of renewables in UK electricity sales is only expected to increase to around 10.25 per cent by 2015.

Many millions of people can't cope with the very high prices for fuel, (another 7 percent increase this month) with the certainty that if we have more cold winters the energy grid eventually won't be able to cope as we've closed too much of our capacity in order to meet our carbon targets and instead hope that useless windmills will take their place.

If high fossil fuel prices cease to exist as an incentive for biofuel development, only where policy is effectively implemented will demand increase.

More importantly, CARD assumes that if the motor fuel supply were 10 % smaller, refiners would not increase output to sell more of their product at higher prices.

To me, looking above and below the fold, try to capture the reality that the fossil fuel industry extracting carbon molecules from the Canadian boreal forest (e.g., Tar Sands) will make more money if Keystone XL gets built and those increased profits will, in essence, be the equivalent of picking the pockets of Americans who currently are benefitting from a «discounted» oil price.

If carbon fee & dividend were implemented in the USA, the increasing the price of fossil fuels and their products would have the effect of reducing their use, compared to fossil - fuel - independent energy sources and products.

So if fossil fuel combustion produces byproducts that cause negative health effects on third parties as well as changes in the temperature of the atmosphere, the obvious lesson from economics is to increase fossil fuel prices enough through taxation to account for these effects.

Tragically, the net effect on the global atmospheric commons will be negligible, because if enough consumers respond to non-price incentives to reduce their consumption, the direct price of fossil fuels will decline, making it economic for others to increase their consumption.

If allowed to stand, the very existence of EPA's Endangerment Finding requires regulation that significantly increases U.S. fossil fuel and electricity prices — negatively impacting job creation as well as energy, economic and national security.

If fossil fuel prices increase more than expected, electric consumers would start to see direct savings even sooner.

Now, adding fuel to the fire, while investors expected OPEC to stabilize markets, as usual, the cartel announced after its November meeting that it would not cut supply to support prices and the Saudi oil minister stated there would be no intervention in oil markets even if prices dropped to $ 20 a barrel — at which point animal spirits and hedge funds betting on continued oil price increases wrested control from supply / demand fundamentals.