In our firm, the reference librarians will find law
if given the parameters such as the name of the legislation or treaty, style of cause of the case, or noting up of caselaw, but the rest is done by lawyers (and articling students).
Not exact matches
there is no doubting that Arsene has helped to provide us with some incredible footballing moments in the formative years of his managerial career at Arsenal, but that certainly doesn't and shouldn't mean that he has earned the right to decide when and how he should leave this club... there have been numerous managers at each of the biggest clubs in Europe throughout the last decade who have waged far more successful campaigns than ours yet somehow and someway each were
given their walking papers because they failed to meet the standards laid out by the hierarchy of their respective clubs... of course that doesn't mean that clubs should simply follow the lead of others, especially
if clubs of note have become too reactionary when it comes to issues of termination, for whatever reasons, but there should be some logical discourse when it comes to the setting of
parameters for a changing of the guard... in the case of Arsenal, this sort of discourse was largely stifled when the higher - ups devised their sinister plan on the eve of our move to the Emirates... by
giving Wenger a free pass due to supposed financial constraints he, unwittingly or not, set the bar too low... it reminds me of a landlord who says he will only rent to «professional people» to maintain a certain standard then does a complete about face when the market is lean and vacancies are up... for those who rented under the original mandate they of course feel cheated but there is little they can do, except move on, especially
if the landlord clearly cares more about profitability than keeping their word... unfortunately for the lifelong fans of a football club it's not so easy to switch allegiances and frankly why should they, in most cases we have been around far longer than them... so how does one deal with such an untenable situation... do you simply shut - up and hope for the best, do you place the best interests of those with only self - serving agendas above the collective and pray that karma eventually catches up with them, do you run away with your tail between your legs and only return when things have ultimately changed, do you keep trying to find silver linings to justify your very existence, do you lower your expectations by convincing yourself it could be worse or do you stand up for what you believe in by holding people accountable for their actions, especially when every fiber of your being tells you that something is rotten in the state of Denmark
Current multiverse models agree with observations only
if certain
parameters are
given specific values —
if the forces holding matter together were slightly stronger or weaker, for instance, it would be impossible for us to be here to observe the universe.
If researchers know the steepness of the mountain slope, along with various friction
parameters, they can calculate how far an avalanche is likely to flow
given any number of different slab depth scenarios — a slab being the layers of snowpack that break off and slide down the mountain.
If a
given mass and rate of annihilation results in more gamma rays than Fermi has actually seen, the physicists could rule out that combination of
parameters.
Unfortunately,
if distance measurements using this method are reported in the popular press, usually only the determined distance is
given, not the measured red shift nor the used cosmological
parameters; this can lead to the result that at different places, different distances are reported for the same object and the same study.
First, when I refer to an objective Bayesian method with a noninformative prior, that means using what would be the original Jeffreys» prior for inferring a joint posterior distribution for all
parameters, appropriately modified
if necessary to
give as accurate inference (marginal posteriors) for individual
parameters as possible.
If we compare
given parameters, we will notice that everyone aspires to what he or she lacks in the own character.
You
give clear - cut advice on physical
parameters in a chaste relationship, and you write that
If youre serious about embracing chastity, you.
If awards are a snapshot, preserving the consensus thoughts about cinema at a
given time for the sake of posterity, a report from a group of passionate lovers of film about what they believe is great in the present moment, then why should they define that snapshot by the
parameters of an industry that views their efforts only in the crudest terms?
What
if the problem was that we need to find the most cost effective design for a classroom,
given materials and certain
parameters?
For example,
if the unit covers the Great Depression and the New Deal,
give students the broad
parameters to begin their speed search.
This test will indicate
if the dog's DNA is within the test
parameters for the breed you indicate and
give you a deeper understanding of your dog's genetic makeup for that specific breed.
In the event of serious weather, sometimes an airline will allow more lenient changes than the prescribed
parameters if you
give them a call and explain your situation.
But
if Abstract Expressionism as it has been presented until recently was an all - male, all - white, heterosexual movement, it needs to be said that Parsons also
gave one - person shows to a number of artists who did not fit those
parameter and have yet to achieve the renown of many of the named above.
Don't be surprised
if the press isn't able to
give you good scientific information when you hear about projections
parameters being exceeded.
If the US network were to miraculously somehow be shown to be
giving false trends, then you would have to explain how there can be no warming in the US when the Australian network shows it clearly across a variety of
parameters.
We tried numerous
parameters using simple multiple regressions and we even bought tickets to the ice classic (
giving an oath that the money would be shared evenly
if any of our times won).
Often, the proximate cause of the climate change is some
parameter of the climate system that can be set off from the general collective behavior of the system and considered as a «
given,» even
if it is not external to the system strictly speaking.
And
if you judge MRES by other criteria than variance or standard deviation, e.g. getting an interesting shape, then you are still within the realm of estimation theory (you're estimating the
parameters that
give you your interesting shape) but no longer in that of minimum mean squared error.
It certainly would happen
if you put all five sine waves into independent play, as I showed after unchecking the «keep all unconstrained
parameters nonnegative» box that Rossander left checked: it would always
give an R2 of 1.00000 no matter what you changed HadCRUT3 to, even
if you changed it to something that looked nothing like a sawtooth.
If I want to be sure that my finite element analysis (FEA) of a mechanical system, for instance, is
giving a reasonable answer, I first check it is consistent with a simplified analytical approximation and then change the analysis
parameters, such as cell number and shape, to see that my FEA solution doesn't change drastically.
Even
if the Callendar
parameters had been calculated using the observed temperature history, it is surely surprising that such a simple formula can out - perform the GCMs, especially
given the enormous amount of time, resources and effort expended in these GCMs.
But linear regression is known to
give the best possible unbiased estimate of its
parameters for any linear function of the data —
if a regression can not
give a reliable enough estimate of the global average temperature, it seems inevitable that the current method must be worse.
I don't know what is in people's mind, but
if GCMers are like CFDers, they will naturally rule out any
parameters that seem to
give an «unreasonable» result.
The equations for Rossby waves (Calculation of the Meridional Wave Number, Physics of the
Parameter, and Calculation of the Amplitudes) show that this can occur
if a set of necessary conditions are met: u ¯ > 0 in the midlatitude region; the highest value of l within the waveguide is in the range of the meridional wave numbers lm dominantly contributing to the external forcing with a
given m, which provides closeness of the k waves to respective m waves not only in terms of the zonal but also the meridional wave numbers, favoring the QRA of the m waves; the total latitudinal width of the waveguide is no less than the characteristic spatial scale of the relevant Airy function (25), which is used as the boundary condition at its southern and northern boundaries; and latitudinal distribution of l is sufficiently smooth in the waveguide, and both TPs lie within a midlatitude region of ∼ 25 ° N — 30 ° N and ∼ 65 ° N − 70 ° N, as the necessary condition for the application of quasilinear Wentzel − Kramers − Brillouin (WKB) method (25) when solving the equations for Rossby waves.
And
given the size of the US obligation, we'll have to push beyond the
parameters of traditional political realism
if we're to break the impasse in the international negotiations.
HPD is sensitive to monotonic transforms of the
parameter in question — it will tell different stories for standard deviation, variance, precision (reciprocal variance), and log variance, while equal tails will
give the same answer for all such transformations,
if appropriately computed.
It would be interesting
if the model outputs and the TLTs were related back to a stochastic emulation with specifed model
parameters given estimated values and ranges.
This can be demonstrated analytically directly from the definition of the Fisher Information for a single
parameter space
if a constant variance is assumed for the distribution of RC age
given a calendar date, and the «true» calendar dates for testing are selected from a uniform distribution.
But what seems to happen is that the temperature data is normalized to observations over the «reference period» and the models are still fed
parameters based on observations beyond the reference period and permitted to run as
if giving a projection into the future, but actually being guided by input
parameters other than temperature.
I have not seen an objective study of model facility
given some input data used as
parameters and data not included that then is predicted to see
if the models are able to deal with «new» data but even under this approach the very existence of the other data clouds the surety of the conclusions as the researchers clearly are aware of that data when they constructed the models.
First, when I refer to an objective Bayesian method with a noninformative prior, that means using what would be the original Jeffreys» prior for inferring a joint posterior distribution for all
parameters, appropriately modified
if necessary to
give as accurate inference (marginal posteriors) for individual
parameters as possible.
In other words,
if confidence intervals are constructed using a
given confidence level in an infinite number of independent experiments, the proportion of those intervals that contain the true value of the
parameter will match the confidence level.»
So with all these security
parameters, this Hardware wallet will
give you a peace of mind
if you store your cryptocurrencies in it.