Not exact matches
All told,
if the eastern and western Antarctic ice shelves were to melt completely, they would raise sea levels by as much as 230 feet (70 meters); the collapse of smaller shelves like Larsen B has sped up the
flow of
glaciers behind them into the sea, contributing to the creeping up of high tide levels around the world.
«
If that happens, the
glacier's
flow could be significantly destabilized, causing it to discharge even more ice into the ocean,» he said.
One 2004 NASA - led study found that most of the
glaciers they were studying «
flow into floating ice shelves over bedrock up to hundreds of meters deeper than previous estimates, providing exit routes for ice from further inland
if ice - sheet collapse is under way.»
On the other hand,
if the ice shell is sufficiently thick, the less intense interior heat can be transferred to warmer ice at the bottom of the shell, with additional heat generated by tidal flexing of the warmer ice which can slowly rise and
flow as do
glaciers do on Earth; this slow but steady motion may also disrupt the extremely cold, brittle ice at the surface to produce the chaos regions.
But also: the geography below the
glacier will determine what,
if anything, will retard the
flow of all that ice into the sea.
However,
if as a consequence of shortening, the
glaciers are also
flowing faster, then we would be seeing another (small) contribution to sea level rise.
Thin
glaciers would barely
flow compared to thick ice sheets
if that was the case.
We used Sentinel - 1 satellite data to watch a giant iceberg four times the size of London break free from Antarctica's Larsen - C ice shelf in 2017, and now students can use the same data to measure
if new icebergs calve off some of the fastest
flowing glaciers in the world!»
If the ice upstream from the calving front warms from whatever it was does that affect the
flow rate of the
glacier?
If that happened a natural barrier to the
flow of ice from
glaciers and land - covering ice sheets into the oceans would be removed.
If enough fresh water from melting
glaciers flows into the North Atlantic, this would make the seawater less salty and less dense, so that it couldn't sink anymore.
If the
glacier thins than there is less friction at the calving front from the fjord walls and the fjord base, leading to greater
flow.
Likewise, Rees and Collins (2006) show that
if all the Himalayan
glaciers were to disappear, there would be about a 33 per cent reduction in annual mean
flow in the west compared to the 1990 level, whereas the decline in the east would be only about 4 - 18 per cent (31).
If lava
flowing from Eyjafjallajokull melts the
glaciers that hold down the top of Katla, then Katla could blow its top, pumping gigantic amounts of ash into the atmosphere.
If the ice shelves were smaller, the
glaciers would
flow much faster towards the ocean, melting and calving more ice than snowfall inland could replace.