Investors will get compensation from a complex scheme
if government policy changes.
Not exact matches
Changes to superannuation
policy played a role in the significantly reduced majority for the Turnbull
government at the July 2 election, but
if you look a little deeper you find something far more interesting — the
government can't afford its retirement
policies, and some retired people can't afford to live.
It will be interesting to see how the federal
government's
policies change,
if at all, once Donald Trump enters the White House.
Martin Moen, the director general at Global Affairs Canada who oversees North American trade
policy, told a conference in Ottawa earlier this month that it would be «very difficult to see a path forward» for NAFTA
if the U.S. continued to insist on
changes that would constrain cross-border commerce, such as a the suggestion that the value of U.S.
government contracts won by Canadian and Mexican firms should match the value of contracts American companies secure in Canada and Mexico.
But
if the
change in fiscal
policy (e.g. an increase in
Government expenditure) is temporary, the exchange rate will appreciate when G increases, and will depreciate again in future when G falls back to normal.
But
if these
policies change — as they may after the recent student demonstrations — Ting and other Protestants may have to oppose the
government in order to maintain their integrity.
If the World Trade Organization penalized countries that imposed such a tariff, its nature would be exposed, and public opinion, acting through
governments, might yet reduce its power or
change its
policies.
If the UK
government chooses to pursue pro-development
policies, maintain its powerful and varied role on the word stage, and to make a concerted effort to
change the tone of the political debate, then opportunities will emerge.
Policymaking also reflects current ideology and background structures power so
if we focus too much on impact as
government policy change then you make academics into people who service the dominant ideology and the powerful in society.
It's good that the Regulatory
Policy Committee is there to clamp down on this sort of bad regulation, and we welcome the
Government's progress so far on this issue, but the RPC needs real powers
if it is to drive
change and challenge Whitehall culture.
«That this House commends the Speaker on the action he has taken over the past year to reassert the principle that Ministers ought to make statements to the House before they are made elsewhere; notes that paragraph 9.1 of the Ministerial Code says that when Parliament is in session, the most important announcements of
Government policy should be made in the first instance in Parliament; believes that compliance with this principle is essential for backbenchers to be able to represent the interests of their constituents and hold the
Government to account; and invites the Procedure Committee to consider how the rules of the House could be better used or,
if necessary,
changed to ensure compliance with this principle and to develop a protocol for the release of information.»
First, fiscal discipline is fundamental to Labour's thinking and
policy development, underpinning every proposal we make, every argument we advance — not only because our wider message will not be heard
if people see us only as spenders, and not also as reformers — but also because we simply will not be able to deliver the
changes we want to make in
government if we do not have strong public finances.
Nadine Dorries has warned the Prime Minister he could face a leadership challenge
if the
Government's
policies don't
change.
DeFrancisco, a Republican from Syracuse, says
if no agreement is reached on some of the unrelated topics by the budget deadline, lawmakers will likely oppose any attempt by the governor to force through the
policy changes in the form of extender bills to keep the
government running.
59 % of people agreed that Labour had «seriously lost touch with ordinary working people» (including 30 % of Labour's own supporters), 70 % that «Labour need to make major
changes to their
policies and beliefs to be fit for
government again» (including 50 % of Labour voters), 61 % agreed that «Labour still haven't faced up to the damage they did to the British economy» and 50 % agreed that «
If Labour returned to
government they would put the country into even more debt».
News International have issued a statement about Major's claim that Murdoch had threatened to oppose the Conservative
government if they did not
change their European
Policy:
Almost 600 ancient trees are in danger of being destroyed in the West Midlands
if a
change in
government policy goes unchallenged, The Woodland Trust says.
Robert Hill, a former
government education
policy advisor and visiting senior research fellow at King's College London, told Schools Week there was a risk of more
change if large numbers of struggling schools were suddenly made into academies.
But
if higher compensation is to be part of the picture, it can not happen without a serious conversation about
policies —
government or otherwise — and funding sources that could lead to actual
changes in the schools, including how teachers are paid.
Let me say to the Education Secretary and all
Government Members that
if they take serious action to make the
changes our education system needs, I will be the first to support them, because education
policy should not be about ideological dogma, but about looking at all the evidence and pursuing
policies that will improve the lives of all children.
For instance,
if you invest all your money in companies within banking industry, a
change in
government policy may have adverse effects on your entire investment.
If you're one of the 44 million people in the country with student debt, we know it isn't easy keeping up with your payments, nor all the news coming out of the
government related to
changing student loan
policies.
If the
government is serious about providing relief to the middle class, stimulating the economy and honoring the contributions of service professionals, it is imperative that this
policy change.
Cash Value Life Insurance is a tremendous asset and a great way to remove the tax burden that eats into so many retirement accounts, but what
if the
government changes the laws regarding life insurance
policy loans.
However, the
government has said it will «retain the option to make
changes to fiscal
policy at the Spring Statement
if the economic circumstances require it».
Of course, that (relatively) rosy picture could well
change if the social safety net is shredded by perverse social
policies a la Trumpism; by deliberate
government policy initiatives such as those enacted by the Ceausescu
government in Romania; or by any degradation of economic and environmental conditions such that your kids become your retirement plan again.
If you study the conservative approach to climate
change policy long enough, the implication that they are trying to participate in a scientific conversation starts to fade away and you realize the underlying logic they are using actually starts from the conclusion that regulation and
government intervention are bad and proceeds to the premise that there is no real problem with climate
change, at which point, they pick around for snippets to support their premise.
If the Inquiry were to report by May, when we are likely to have a General Election it could give the incoming
government a solid reason to review their climate
change policy.
If governments were determined to implement their climate
policies, a lot of that carbon would have to be left in the ground, says Carbon Tracker, a non-profit organisation, and the Grantham Research Institute on Climate
Change, part of the London School of Economics.
The CTI report says there will be no need for new coal mines, oil demand will peak around 2020, and growth in gas will disappoint industry expectations
if world leaders agree and then implement the
policies needed to meet the UN commitment to keep climate
change below 2 ˚C − the threshold agreed by most
governments.
The report said that the
government's Clean Growth Strategy does not do enough to meet legally - binding climate
change targets, even
if all its
policies are implemented.
If the Senate was interested in uncovering secretive funding apparatus bent on twisting
government policy to the detriment of people and their future, perhaps a look into climate
change denial organizations would be a better use of tax dollars.
Yet last month, twelve Canadian climate scientists, economists and
policy experts condemned the
government in their alarmist open letter to Natural Resources Minister Joe Oliver writing that,
if Canada wants to avoid dangerous climate
change it
Another blogger here, asked me
if I would rather a heart surgeon was advising the
government on climate
change policy than a climate scientist.
To give his
government's
policies moral legitimacy, she had thrown at him the figure that, according to the UN, 150,000 people die each year as a result of climate
change, for which the UK would be culpable
if it failed to act on climate
change.
If there is a real show of bona fides from the new US
government too, this could ease such
changes in Chinese
policy considerably.
«No one activity, even
if you have a billion people marching, is going to
change something as big and complicated as climate or the
policies of the
governments of the world,» concedes Leslie Cagan, the national march coordinator.
Don't expect any serious
change in US
government policy even
if the Republicans take the Senate in the midterms this year.
We prefer playing nice, but
if we can't get your
government to
change its
policies soon, we'll need to bring them down.
This skeptic — as in little old moi — makes no such assertion instead asserting that
if the outcome of
government policy is even nearly as damaging as the predicted damage caused by really scary climate
change then doing nothing is probably best.
if you went to a cardiologist and there were no engineers, the cardiologist would tell you of an irregular heartbeat and say sorry there is nothing we can do.really an absurd arguement... keep talking about the money and remember: «The US
Government has spent more than $ 79 billion of taxpayers» money since 1989 on
policies related to climate
change, including science and technology research, blah blah blah and you know where this came from so i leave out the note peace, rich
«Most recent polls... have indicated a clear drop in the public support for climate
change and therefore,
if Government wishes to retain its mandate for action it needs to improve public understanding of the scientific basis [sic] for climate
change policy,» it reads.
In addition to these
changes, the
government has the ability to prescribe additional specific requirements for the
policies and procedures that employers must have in place to address workplace harassment, so new regulations may be coming in future
if it's determined that employers need additional guidance to ensure effective
policies are put in place.
For instance,
if there are planning constraints on new housing, then it is for
government to
change planning
policy accordingly rather than pinning the blame on supposed «delays».
b. Address
change: You can
change your address by sending a filled out
policy amendment request form along with your address proof (
if cumulative premium of all your active
policies is greater than $ 10,000 inclusive of all applicable taxes, cess, and levies as imposed by the
Government).
Although there is benefit in this, I am concerned that this will not be sufficient, and that this
policy needs to be complemented by
changes to the underlying system
if the outcomes the
government would like to see are to be attained.
Further,
if the
Government proceeds with legislative or
policy change relating to the proposals set out in the Discussion Paper, such legislation or
policy must be consistent with the provisions of the Racial Discrimination Act 1975 (Cth).
However,
if the
government hopes to achieve its goal of seeing «more, and better, outcomes delivered through native title processes», then it must also make legislative and
policy changes to the underlying system.
If you're unemployed and in danger of going into default on your mortgage the nation's
Government Sponsored Enterprises (GSE's), Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac, are making some important
changes to their foreclosure and forbearance (when the bank suspends collection of payments for a period of time, kind of like a timeout on making payments)
policies.