Furthermore, the researchers suspect that even
if habitat destruction were to halt in these areas, the remaining large animal species would have little chance of maintaining viable populations beyond the next few decades.
Not exact matches
In a letter publishing Monday in Frontiers of Ecology and the Environment, Norma Fowler and Tim Keitt, both professors in the Department of Integrative Biology, examine what would happen
if more of Texas» roughly 1,200 miles of border with Mexico were to be walled off, contributing to
habitat destruction,
habitat fragmentation and ecosystem damage.
The researchers claimed that changing weather patterns would commit up to 37 percent of the world's species to extinction by 2050 — far more than would go extinct
if we continued at the current rate of
habitat destruction.
If the crops failed, these communities contained too many people to survive on local foraging or hunting — both because population densities were so high and because the
habitat destruction caused by farming had reduced the amount of local wild food.
Even
if a species is capable of outrunning global climate change, it may not be able to in the face of
habitat destruction, pollution, invasive species, and overexploitation.
This extent of
habitat destruction and fragmentation means that even
if individuals of a species can move fast enough to cope with ongoing climate change, they will have difficulty dispersing into suitable areas because adequate dispersal corridors no longer exist.
The researchers claimed that changing weather patterns would commit up to 37 percent of the world's species to extinction by 2050 — far more than would go extinct
if we continued at the current rate of
habitat destruction.