The reason is that I'm here with Mark, who,
if you heard him speak, is obviously from Great Britain and he's been teaching me to hold a cup of coffee with my little finger up.
I had the pleasure
if hearing him speak at a Fashion Moda related panel discussion at No Longer Empty's This side of Paradise exhibition at the Bronx's abandoned Andrew Freedman home.
Not exact matches
Or
if someone hasn't
spoken in a while, they'll stop and say «hey Jim, I haven't
heard from you in a while, what are you thinking about?»
If they're only
hearing your brand goals and
speaking points through a second hand source or intermediary, how can they be passionate about your brand?
If you
speak in the brain's «native language,» you can avoid that painful back - and - forth and get buyers to accept facts that they otherwise might not want to
hear.
But make no mistake: The kind of lewd talk
heard in the video could get you fired in many work environments — even
if the remarks aren't about the person being
spoken to.
If you're an entrepreneur, you must learn that most sales are lost over objections you never
hear, not some obvious and
spoken objection like the price.
For example,
if you are going to be
speaking at a conference, how can you use social media to publicize that event, get feedback on the content your audience would like to
hear, and use that content in an enduring way after the live event (like video clips)?
But
if you worked at GE at that time and
heard Welch
speak, he would have focused over and over again on just three things: globalize the business, drive service and recurring revenues, and improve quality throughout the company by embracing the discipline of six sigma.
This will not be like any conversation you've ever
heard... even
if you've
heard Tony
speak before.
We decide
if we like and trust someone before we have even
heard him or her
speak.
Speaking of Didi as a «one solution,» the ride - hailing company's logo was absent from the display of partners at the launch, so we asked Ma
if we can expect to
hear anything soon.
However, on matters of governance and shareholder rights, we believe shareholders should have the power to
speak and the opportunity to be
heard and effect change
if necessary.
I would tell someone just starting their career here at Franklin Templeton that they should not be afraid to contribute ideas, challenge the way that things are done, or
speak up as I have found that colleagues and leaders are always open to
hearing what you have to say and will act upon ideas
if they feel as though it would be beneficial.
Trump told the senators that he has
spoken to his own accountant about the tax plan and that he would be a «big loser»
if the deal is approved as written, according to multiple people in the room who
heard the president on the phone.
'' Mikey,
if you are right, WHY is it that our listening devices NEVER
heard such things as you
speak of?
... But I wouldn't bother to tell you anyhow, because you and your kind have no eyes to see...
If God Himself came down from Heaven, and stood before you, staring you in the face, you would not recognize Him... you're no different then those who were there and have seen His works,
heard Him
speak and do great miracles among them.
What
if I claimed I flew to New York in a 67 Mustang,
heard God through the radio
speaking to me alone and telling me to build a church on the site of the twinitowers?
After reading Klaus Bockmuehl's book, Listening to the God Who
Speaks: Reflections on God's Guidance from Scripture and the Lives of God's People, the conclusion one would have to draw is that
if you're not
hearing God, you're deaf.
and
if you say god has
spoken to you directly, well, you are either lying or
hearing voices.
If you can dream — and not make dreams your master,
If you can think — and not make thoughts your aim;
If you can meet with Triumph and Disaster And treat those two impostors just the same;
If you can bear to
hear the truth you've
spoken Twisted by knaves to make a trap for fools, Or watch the things you gave your life to, broken, And stoop and build»em up with worn - out tools:
In The Literal Meaning of Genesis, he writes, «It is too disgraceful and ruinous, though, and greatly to be avoided, that he [the non-Christian] should
hear a Christian
speaking so idiotically on these matters, and as
if in accord with Christian writings, that he might say that he could scarcely keep from laughing when he saw how totally in error they are.»
Radio would be the most wonderful means of communication imaginable in public life, a huge linked system — that is to say, it would be such
if it were capable not only of transmitting but of receiving, of allowing the listener not only to
hear but to
speak, and did not isolate him but brought him into contact.
If it is the task of liberation theology to
speak from the point of view of the victims of social and economic injustice, what is the appropriate response of those theologians in the oppressor community who
hear and want to support the aspirations of the oppressed?
Others: Having been sexually abused by a man in our church myself at the age of 12, and having had to endure the consequences for the last 42 years, and having been the target of several righteous / religious attacks over the last few years, the abused have a right to
speak and be
heard even
if it makes you uncomfortable.
Even
if someone is your «friend,» don't buy their book, pay to
hear them
speak and the like until they publicly renounce their involvement with the US emergent brand.
Yet, even for some of us, there are things we shouldn't write for all the world to see ``...
speak to your brother in secret and
if he
hear you, you have gained a brother (Gal 6).
SO, at a government business meeting, where people come to be
heard by the people, kermits solution is to tune people out... and that tuning out WILL extend to that person
if they have some businiess to
speak on.
«It's really useful,
if you get the chance to
speak to your candidates, for them to
hear that climate change is something that their voters care about and something that the Church cares about.»
If I am to have a right to free speech, for example, then I must be empowered to
speak and be
heard, which means using the power of the state to give me the resources I need and to suppress anything that might disempower me.
«Son of man,
speak to the children of your people, and say to them: «When I bring the sword upon a land, and the people of the land take a man from their territory and make him their watchman, when he sees the sword coming upon the land,
if he blows the trumpet and warns the people, then whoever
hears the sound of the trumpet and does not take warning,
if the sword comes and takes him away, his blood shall be on his own head.
Forgive me
if I'm wrong about the origins but don't you think that a «monkey» is implied due to the original use of «
hear no evil,
speak no evil» even
if she isn't drawn as one?
My name is Beverly for the past month gone by somethings being happening to me an i need answers i went to many churches but got different answer.i being feeling cold, trembling of the body,
hearing things
speaking to me, feeling fearful for no reason head spinning like
if i have a crown on my head.
If I
spoke to him, he would
hear only growlings and roarings.
In my opinion as a gun owner I feel everyone whether its a fully automatic machine gun or a BB gun everyone should have to have a check to see
if they have a mental illness that would prevent them from owning a gun and I would not have a problem having that done to me and when it comes down to evangelicals
speaking out every child of GOD needs to be
heard.
On behalf of Christians all over the world, we condemn this man, and I vow
if I ever
hear a fellow Christian in my church
speak out in favor of any violent act like this I will stand up to that person.
I believe that
if we have eyes to see and ears to
hear, the Gospel answers the questions and fulfills the longings that are
spoken, sang, painted, and
heard in all the various artistic and creative pursuits of all humanity.
What
hearing could he gain
if he stood in this pulpit today, or in any pulpit in America, and
spoke to us now about our depravity and corruption, about our unfreedom and the determination of our lives, about the ineffable gloriousness of God, and about the awfulness of his wrath?
You'd think
if God
spoke to anybody, it would be a pastor's child, but Patti swears she has never
heard the voice of God.
Even
if you've never
heard of «vocal fry» or «upspeak,» you probably
hear people
speak in these patterns every day.
If one is to
hear, someone else must
speak.
Seconds later I
heard her asking him
if he could
speak with me.
If, for example, we have been in the habit of thinking of God's total creation of the world as occurring in six days of twenty - four hours each and we learn that the creation stories in Genesis are a prescientific attempt to present great religious truth rather than accurate geology or biology, we fail to hear God speak if we refuse to change our mind
If, for example, we have been in the habit of thinking of God's total creation of the world as occurring in six days of twenty - four hours each and we learn that the creation stories in Genesis are a prescientific attempt to present great religious truth rather than accurate geology or biology, we fail to
hear God
speak if we refuse to change our mind
if we refuse to change our minds.
If we use the logically odd phrase «Word of God» to describe the Bible, with «Word» as the model and «of God» as the qualifier, so that we speak of «hearing» God's Word, we mean that if we follow the verbal pattern formed by the words of scripture, we may find ourselves in a situation in which a disclosure occurs; the «light dawns» or the «ice breaks.&raqu
If we use the logically odd phrase «Word of God» to describe the Bible, with «Word» as the model and «of God» as the qualifier, so that we
speak of «
hearing» God's Word, we mean that
if we follow the verbal pattern formed by the words of scripture, we may find ourselves in a situation in which a disclosure occurs; the «light dawns» or the «ice breaks.&raqu
if we follow the verbal pattern formed by the words of scripture, we may find ourselves in a situation in which a disclosure occurs; the «light dawns» or the «ice breaks.»
See John 20:30; Mark 16:17 - 20; John 2:11; Acts 2:22: («Ye men of Israel,
hear these words: Jesus of Nazareth, a man approved of God among you by miracles and wonders and signs, which God did by him in the midst of you, as ye yourselves also know»); Acts 2:43: -LRB-»... and many wonders and signs were done by the apostles»); Acts 4:29 - 30: «And now, Lord, behold their threatenings: and grant unto thy servants, that with all boldness they may
speak thy word, By stretching forth thine hand to heal; and that signs and wonders may be done by the name of thy hold child Jesus»); Hebrews 2:3 - 4: («How shall we escape,
if we neglect so great salvation; which at the first began to be
spoken by the Lord, and was confirmed unto us by them that
heard him: God also bearing them witness, both with signs and wonders, and with divers miracles, and gifts of the Holy Ghost, according to his own will»); Romans 15:17 - 19: («I have therefor whereof I may glory through Jesus Christ in those things which pertain to God.
CNN: My Take:
If you
hear God
speak audibly, you (usually) aren't crazy Tanya Marie («T.M.») Luhrmann, psychological anthropologist and the author of «When God Talks Back: Understanding the American Evangelical Relationship with God,» explains that
hearing the voice of God isn't as unusual as many would believe.
Jesus
spoke to Peter about feeding his sheep, and to his apostles about people who lacked the eyes to see and the ears to
hear and how they will never understand his parables even
if they try (and, interestingly, he said this as the reason he taught using parables rather than just stating things out explicitly).
Those who
hear the proclamation may have full confidence in the God of which it
speaks:
If... how much more must... Luke, concerned with the ongoing life of the Church and experience of the Christian «way», understands the reference to be to confidence in prayer; but it seems more probable that the original reference was to the totality of the proclamation as it challenged the hearer.
Of course,
if someone is so close with God and Jesus as the apostles and many Christians in the 1st century were, that believer won't need the Bible in order «to
hear» God
speaking since he
hears the Holy Spirit directly.
The point at which communication frequently breaks down is not in the
speaking or the listening, per se, but in failing to check frequently to see
if one really
hears and understands what the other means, feels, and intends.