It will become exceedingly difficult to keep warming below a target smaller than 2 °C,
if high emissions continue much longer.
Of course I agree with you that «
If high emission rates are plausible, then we should be factoring the impacts due to these into risk assessments.»
Not exact matches
If your condition for GHG policy is that you must impose the same price on all sectors of the economy because you want to be cost - effective, that rules out
higher prices on some sectors where deep
emissions reductions are possible, or lower prices in more politically sensitive areas to ensure you get a policy in place at all.
If the goods they produced end up being imported from jurisdictions with less stringent environmental standards, then we lose twice —
higher global GHG
emissions and less economic activity in Canada.
So,
if one does want to lower
emissions, the choice is not between a carbon price and nothing, but between a carbon price and regulations, technology subsidies,
higher - cost renewable energy, or the long list of other tools.
According to a recent study from Denkstatt, an Austrian environmental sustainability solutions think tank, «Even
if improved packaging solutions contribute to increased CO2
emissions, the CO2 savings from reduced food waste are in most cases much
higher.»
Study into carbon tax on
high -
emissions food finds people would be more likely to eat less meat
if they had to pay more for it
Higher taxes on domestic flights and improved public transport are needed
if Britain is to cut carbon
emissions by 80 per cent before 2050, a Conservative policy group has said.
The number of days each year above 95 ° Fahrenheit (35 ° Celsius) is expected to rise across the United States, and average summer temperatures will reach new heights
if greenhouse gas
emissions remain
high.
Hossaini and his team also assessed what would happen to
high - altitude ozone
if CH2Cl2
emissions rose at twice the rate seen in the past decade.
According to his calculations, global infrared
emission would be 0.8 watts per square metre
higher if all atmospheric ice crystals contained lead compared with none.
Removing fossil subsidies would only slightly slow the growth of CO2
emissions, with the result that by 2030 they would only be 1 - 5 % lower than
if subsidies had been maintained, regardless of whether oil prices are low or
high.
According to the Congressional Budget Office, the average American family would pay $ 1,160 in
higher prices
if carbon
emissions had to be cut 15 percent.
If this had been supplied by fossil fuels instead, CO2
emissions would have been at least 5.5 million tonnes
higher, and as much as 12 million tonnes
higher.
The analysis by Yang and Jackson finds that
if the gas produced by the new plants is used to generate electricity, the total lifecycle greenhouse gas
emissions would be 36 percent to 82 percent
higher than pulverized coal - fired power.
Prof Atatüre says «We chose WS2 because it has
higher bandgap, and we wanted to see
if different materials offered different parts of the spectra for single photon
emission.
If oil prices remain
high and governments make progress on their
emissions goals, there's a possibility that the world has already hit peak oil, and that the next few years will see its use plateau for a while before dropping again.
Even
if all greenhouse
emissions were to stop today, atmospheric carbon dioxide will remain
high for millennia, and ocean surface temperatures will stay elevated even longer, a new study predicts.
If Americans in the
highest - impact group shifted their diets to align with the U.S. average — by consuming fewer overall calories and relying less on meat — the one - day greenhouse - gas
emissions reduction would be equivalent to eliminating 661 million passenger - vehicle miles, according to the researchers.
To determine the structural and chemical composition of the soft tissues Lindgren collected and see
if the fossil sea turtle did have a dark colored shell, the researchers subjected the sample to a selection of
high - resolution analytical techniques, including field
emission gun scanning electron microscopy (FEG - SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), in situ immunohistochemistry, time - of - flight secondary ion mass spectrometry (ToF - SIMS), and infrared (IR) microspectroscopy.
«
If poor countries hadn't gone down that road, our carbon
emissions would be now far
higher than they are, and it would be growing every day much worse than it is.»
One outcome emphasised by experts is that
if society continues on the current
high emissions trajectory, cold water coral reefs, located in the deep sea, may be unsustainable and tropical coral reef erosion is likely to outpace reef building this century.
Communities of color and those with low education and
high poverty and unemployment may face greater health risks even
if their air quality meets federal health standards.A pervasive air pollutant, the fine particulate matter known as PM2.5 is a mixture of
emissions from diesel engines, power plants, refineries and other sources of combustion.
If greenhouse gas
emissions continue on their current trend, the rate of warming will reach 0.7 °F per decade and stay that
high until at least 2100.
If current
emission trends continue, by 2100, CO2 concentration would be
higher than the Earth has seen in more than 10 million years.
In one sentence: Researchers at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory and colleagues found that
if followed by measures of equal or greater ambition, individual country pledges to reduce their
emissions called Intended Nationally Determined Contributions have the potential to reduce the probability of the
highest levels of warming and increase the probability of limiting global warming to 2 degrees Celsius.
If the natural geologic methane
emissions are lower than previously thought, the anthropogenic fossil methane
emissions must be
higher than previously thought — Petrenko estimates by 25 percent or more.
Projections based on 29 climate models suggest that the number of
high wildfire potential days each year could increase by nearly 50 percent by 2050
if greenhouse gas
emissions continue unabated.
If emissions continue down a mid-range path — one consistent with the direction current policies and market trends seem to be taking us — the new results indicate a
higher likely rise of 0.7 to 1.3 meters (2.2 to 4.1 feet), compared to 0.4 to 0.8 meters (1.4 to 2.5 feet) in the IPCC - consistent estimate.
And
if we continue to track the
highest emissions scenarios — taking us to 4C or 5C by the end of the century — the risk of potentially catastrophic impacts rises even
higher, the report adds.
If one is looking for real differences among mainstream scientists, they can be found on two fronts: the precise implications of those
higher temperatures, and which technologies and policies offer the best solution to reducing, on a global scale, the
emission of greenhouse gases.
Such research is needed for understanding future changes in cyclones and avoided impacts
if we follow the Paris Agreement on climate change, rather than current,
high greenhouse gas
emission pathways.»
Future global temperature change should depend mainly on atmospheric CO2, at least
if fossil fuel
emissions remain
high.
Extensive simulations [17], [194] confirm that the effect of solar variability is small compared with GHGs
if CO2
emissions continue at a
high level.
Antarctic ice sheet models double the sea - level rise expected this century
if global
emissions of heat - trapping pollution remain
high.
CO2 accounts for more than 80 % of the added GHG forcing in the past 15 years [64], [167] and,
if fossil fuel
emissions continue at a
high level, CO2 will be the dominant driver of future global temperature change.
For Coral Springs, for example, which appears to be comfortably inland, the
high - tide line will encompass about a quarter of the city's population some time in the distant future,
if emissions continue at current levels through the year 2040.
Another potential feedback might occur
if reduced timber yields force loggers to compensate by enlarging the amount of area harvested, resulting in
higher CO2
emissions through deforestation and associated fires, as well as increased rates of habitat fragmentation / degradation and species extinctions
Chancellor Philip Hammond announced that from 1 April 2018 new diesels could be moved to
higher tax bands
if they don't meet certain
emissions regulations.
Those additives, in
higher concentration, can damage your
emission treatment (like catalyst, particle - filter
if present).
If the location of the turbines between the cylinder rows is not quite appropriate, it causes
high concentration of heat
emission.
Official fuel economy figures for the standard M4 stand at 32.1 mpg, with CO2
emissions coming in at 204g / km; the CS produces 33.6 mpg and 197g / km of CO2 and the
high - performance M4 GTS emits 199g / km of CO2 and returns 34mpg, but it's unlikely you'll ever achieve
if you're driving it in the way it was intended.
However, for the same sort of money a Golf 1.6 TDI Match offers more passenger space, a better ride and handling combination and a
higher quality, better laid out cabin, even
if it can't quite equal the Civic for equipment, boot space, CO2
emissions or fuel economy.
Of course
if you've used up the battery charge by driving
emissions - free on electric power (for up to 29 miles, depending on driving style), the consumption and CO2 figures will be considerably
higher.
One of the new features is the fuel consumption and gearshift indicator (
if the six - speed transmission is specified), which informs the driver of the current fuel consumption and at what point the next -
highest gear should be selected in order to save fuel and reduce CO2
emissions (also see page 89).
Don't expect to see this on the trip computer
if you explore that rip - roaring engine, though, while the 258g / km CO2
emissions put it in the
highest tax bracket.
Still, CO2
emissions of 228g / km mean a
high Benefit in Kind tax bill
if you're lucky enough to use the NSX as a company car.
For example,
if your assignment is to explore the main cause of global warming, your thesis statement can be the following: The
high rate of chemical
emissions into air is the main cause of global warming.
[1] CO2 absorbs IR, is the main GHG, human
emissions are increasing its concentration in the atmosphere, raising temperatures globally; the second GHG, water vapor, exists in equilibrium with water / ice, would precipitate out
if not for the CO2, so acts as a feedback; since the oceans cover so much of the planet, water is a large positive feedback; melting snow and ice as the atmosphere warms decreases albedo, another positive feedback, biased toward the poles, which gives larger polar warming than the global average; decreasing the temperature gradient from the equator to the poles is reducing the driving forces for the jetstream; the jetstream's meanders are increasing in amplitude and slowing, just like the lower Missippi River where its driving gradient decreases; the larger slower meanders increase the amplitude and duration of blocking
highs, increasing drought and extreme temperatures — and 30,000 + Europeans and 5,000 plus Russians die, and the US corn crop, Russian wheat crop, and Aussie wildland fire protection fails — or extreme rainfall floods the US, France, Pakistan, Thailand (driving up prices for disk drives — hows that for unexpected adverse impacts from AGW?)
For instance, an effort to shape an initiative for curbing
emissions would have a
higher chance of success
if it considered research showing which messages and incentives cause people to change, or resist change.