Sentences with phrase «if human aging»

After all, as he has pointed out, if human aging were completely preventable, and disease eradicated, the average life span might be about 300 years.

Not exact matches

If some plants and animals don't age, why should humans have to?

This is content production in the age of algorithmic discovery — even if you're a human, you have to end up impersonating the machine.

According to the researchers, if the same was found to be true in humans, it could not only have implications as a sleep aid, but may also help to curb age - related disease.

Second, there is actually zero evidence that humans and dinos lived together, but if they did, it's because some dinos persisted into the age of mammals.

But it is not enough to win the war, if that means keeping alive the memory of God, nature, and the human person in an increasingly inhuman and antihuman age.

While the dawning of the universally democratic age promises many goods?among them, peace, economic prosperity, and political freedom for millions, if not billions, of human beings?it may not be altogether good.

Though most, if not all, humans are guilty of thinking judgmental and hypocritical thoughts, those making up roughly 60 % 0f the population who are truly ignorant, narrowminded, with lack of a personal identity (easily manipulated by peers) tend to go to the extreme of blowing the horn of self - righteousness by pointing out the flaws in other groups instead of focusing on their own flaws, which is an increased epidemic in this day in age especially in the age groups of 15 to 33.

The erotic literature of the age which is so exclusively concerned with one person's enjoyment of another and the pseudo-psychoanalytical thinking which looks for the solution to the problem of marriage through simply freeing «inhibitions» both ignore the vital importance of the Thou which must be received in true presentness if human life, either public or personal, is to exist.

... you can claim free will and by so cover all of the human actions done to the world but how can say that god is real and controls nature when nature has killed more purely innocent lives then anything in history ever... if god was just and comp@ssinate why send the wave that killed 300 thousand, why create the plague that killed nearly 75 million in the middle ages when nearly everyone was a VERY devout believer....

The fundamental question of our age is this: Can humans really maintain a civilization if a predominant majority live etsi Deus non daretur, as if there is no God?

There is no danger, therefore, that evolution if it is understood in a truly metaphysical and theologically correct way, will teach us to think less of the first human being than was thought in earlier ages.

Used creatively to fulfill the lives of persons, technology may help bring in an age of universal well - being; in an inadequate social context it may contribute to human degradation and enslavement, if not destruction or extinction.

With due respect for Father Neuhaus» human compassion, I submit that even if the priest were guilty of nothing more than harboring sexual lust in his heart toward a male or female of any age, the priest ought to have immediately recognized that he had not been given the gift of celibacy, and thus had badly misjudged his ability to keep his ordination vows.

But, how do you know that if humans were to leave the dark ages and truly except how special we are to each other (all we have in this vast cosmos) that would be better to each other?

@sirhuxley: so if we all agree that all religious books are man made whether with good intentions or of trying to rule others then the age of earth would not have to match (within 6 days) the creation of humans and we would not really be objecting to a God!?

And even more fundamentally, if we are bearers of inviolable dignity and a basic right to life in virtue of our humanity, and not in virtue of accidental qualities such as age, or size, or stage of development or condition of dependency --- if, in other words, we believe in the fundamental equality of human beings --- how can a right to abortion (where «abortion» means performing an act whose purpose is to cause fetal death) be defended at all?

It took most of a lifetime of being looked - over and isolated for us to find one another at ages 50 and 61, and I am responding to this editorial to tell you this: If you are alive, breathing, and able to give a bit of your heart to another human without set expectations on what the returns will look like, or feel like - love will find a way.

That Man is the product of causes which had no prevision of the end they were achieving; that his origin, his growth, his hopes and fears, his loves and his beliefs, are but the outcome of accidental collocations of atoms; that no fire, no heroism, no intensity of thought and feeling, can preserve an individual life beyond the grave; that all the labours of the ages, all the devotion, all the inspiration, all the noonday brightness of human genius, are destined to extinction in the vast death of the solar system, and that the whole temple of Man's achievement must inevitably be buried beneath the debris of a universe in ruins — all these things, if not quite beyond dispute, are yet so nearly certain, that no philosophy which rejects them can hope to stand.

We do not deny or circumscribe the Creator, because we hold he has created the self - acting originating human mind, which has almost a creative gift; much less then do we deny or circumscribe His power, if we hold that He gave matter such laws as by their blind instrumentality moulded and constructed through innumerable ages the world as we see it... Mr Darwin's theory need not then be atheistical, be it true or not; it may simply be suggesting a larger idea of Divine Prescience and Skill... At first sight I do not see that «the accidental evolution or organic beings» is inconsistent with divine design - It is accidental to us, not to God.»

If you've reached the age of 40 you should realize that Jesus was a man, a great man, a man to be revered for teaching us about good and evil, compassion, a man to be respected and admired, as a great human being who taught us all something useful.

That man is the product of causes which had no prevision of the end they were achieving; that his origin, his growth, his hopes and fears, his loves and his beliefs, are but the outcome of accidental concatenations of atoms; that no force, no heroism, no intensity of thought or feeling, can presume an individual life beyond the grave; that all the labors of the age, all the devotion, all the inspiration, all the noon - day brightness of human genius, are destined to extinction in the vast death of the solar system, and that the whole temple of Man's achievement must inevitably be buried beneath the debris of a universe in ruin... all these things, if not quite beyond dispute, are yet so nearly certain, that no philosophy which rejects them can hope to stand.

So what if God just hasn't been by here in long ages of humans like the humans in the story had not been past that anthill?

No longer can we live as if we were in an earlier age, when ethical teaching was either ignorant of what we now know to be the case or unwilling to give due recognition to human existence as we have come to understand it.

... you can claim free will and by so cover all of the human actions done to the world but how can say that god is real and controls nature when nature has killed more purely innocent lives then anything in history ever... if god was just and comp@ssinate why send the tsunami that killed 300 thousand, why create the plague that killed nearly 75 million in the middle ages when nearly everyone was a VERY devout believer....

To take control of them is, we must admit, part of the Human Genome Initiative — indeed, still more, part of the modern project whose «legitimacy» and «curiosity» have been defended by Hans Blumenberg in his provocative (if Teutonic) book The Legitimacy of the Modern Age.

If the horrors of the modern age suggest that human evil is perhaps even more awful in its reach than he imagined, it is also the case that there is a broadly shared human revulsion against such evil.

Henry viara adue as managers or any with couching credentials would do because they are Arsenal they are connected with the supporters and players after all its history particularly if they won the league they would know what it takes the very way that Mr wenger is to Arsenal I know how i feel but at the very end these players are human beings you ought to give them the chance when you are attached to a player since the age of 17 it becomes difficult even when regarding to emotions i truly believe that Mr wenger is their spiritual Dad

I think its time to do something about this, over the 2 legs, ireland were clearly the better side, that notwithstanding this particular french team is the worst i've seen in decades, and they have no bussines going to the world cup.It is time for replays to be reviewed in some cases and goaline technology to be applied in other cases, i think we human being have come of age to realise that we humans are not perfect, no matter how hard we try, so for sepp blatter to keep resisting replays and goal line technology is quite baffling to me, i can't really understand why 3 socalled officials could make a decision, a decision in which the whole world saw to be a foul, and its allowed to stand, and a nation is left, heartbroken, cheated and bitter, i am an african, but as a fan of football, i felt terrible seeing this, and i beg the question, if someone other than the team is not benefiting from this, why can't the officials be allowed to take a look at the replays in order to officiate the game better?

Human babies are not designed to sleep through the night anyway, especially because they to need eliminate several times a night or feed if they're little (the frequency depends on the age of the baby).

If you're not in Massachusetts, the national Planned Parenthood website offers educational resources for parents, including age by age guides for how to talk to children about sex, human sexuality, and AIDS.

A study by the National Institutes of Child Health and Human Development found that children do best if they're cared for by someone who is genuinely concerned about their well - being and development, and who makes sure they're doing a variety of age - appropriate activities.

to determine what the natural age at weaning would be in humans if it was not set by cultural standards?

Start»em early It's a natural, human instinct that children have when it comes to food: If they haven't been exposed to a something before the age of 3, they're not going to eat it, because they're afraid it will hurt them.

She discussed a variety of fascinating topics, including breastfeeding and the media, her research on what the natural age of weaning would be in modern humans if we set aside our cultural beliefs, and caring for children and why babies cry.

If you think health care is expensive now, wait until these little human pillows reach adulthood and then, assuming their hearts hold out, advanced age.

What I am criticising, and will continue to criticise, is the escalating inability of the middle - class left to talk to or about anyone who is NOT middle class and middle - aged as if they are human beings, to really listen to their needs and thoughts and strategies and accept that they too have political ideas which are just as important as yours.

We are humans and if she had spoken to us respectively, I think none of the old students would have been adamant taking her age into consideration.

If the larger body ratifies their proposal, we will be living in the age of humans.

«If proven true, then combined use of metformin and rapamycin for treating aging and age - associated diseases in humans may be possible,» the researchers wrote in their conclusion.

If TNP has similar effects in humans, it may even be able to stimulate bone growth after fractures or prevent bone loss due to aging or disuse.

In human terms, it'd be as if the asexual females could produce children at 13 years of age, whereas the sexual females wouldn't reach reproductive age until age 18.

But just when it seemed as if the Human Genome Project would take us nowhere fast, the burgeoning field of bioinformatics — treating DNA as data — came of age.

Scientists from the department of social neuroscience at the Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences (MPI CBS) together with colleagues from the MPI for Evolutionary Anthropology (MPI EVA) explored the question at what age we develop the motivation to watch, from our perspective, a deserved punishment and if this feature also exists in our closest relatives — chimpanzees.

If you think most fish stinks after 3 days, try 11,500 years: That's the age of salmon bones that archaeologists have uncovered at the Upward Sun River site, one of Alaska's oldest human settlements.

If the findings translate to humans, this restoration of muscle mass could help to combat some of the effects of age - related frailty, which often lead to osteoporosis and other debilitating conditions.

If this proves true in humans, women in their forties, fifties, and sixties may be able to bear children by freezing stem cells at a young age and having them re-implanted at a later date.

If that's the case, it would mean that stopping aging would not extend human life span by much.

As Huber Warner, associate director of the Biology of Aging Program at the NationalInstitute of Aging, says, «If we knew what regulates life span inturtles, that might be useful in figuring out how humans age and how tointervene.»

If something similar happens in humans, scientists say, methods for countering the protein may hold promise for treating age - related brain decline.