But
if human choices are free, uncaused, then a particular choice may or may not occur; the event and its consequent effects would be purely contingent.
Not exact matches
Maybe, someday,
if money managers no longer are making salaries and bonuses I consider exorbitant, my predisposition toward
humans will swing my
choice the other way.
Please, any Christian, honestly answer the following: The completely absurd theory that all 7,000,000,000
human beings are simultaneously being supervised 24 hours a day, every day of their lives by an immortal, invisible being for the purposes of reward or punishment in the «afterlife» comes from the field of: (a) Astronomy; (b) Medicine; (c) Economics; or (d) Christianity You are about 70 % likely to believe the entire Universe began less than 10,000 years ago with only one man, one woman and a talking snake
if you are a: (a) historian; (b) geologist; (c) NASA astronomer; or (d) Christian I have convinced myself that gay $ ex is a
choice and not genetic, but then have no explanation as to why only gay people have ho.mo $ exual urges.
If you are two consenting adult
human beings and you desire to have a loving, committed relationship in which to raise a family, and you wish to have all of the benefits and responsibilities that comes with it, marriage is a good
choice.
God has given
humans genuine freedom, so much so that
if they choose to reject Him, He honors their
choice, including the painful consequences (for them AND for Him) that their
choice entails.
If God is as the Calvinist insists, then they are right: we mere
humans can not question God's judgment or challenge His
choices from eternity past to choose some for redemption and others for reprobation.
Because God respects the
choices of
humans, God can not force anybody to love Him or believe in Him, and so
if a person decides once and for all to separate themselves from God, God must allow them to go their own way.
If we evolved from the lower primates, then when we reached the stage of reflection and conscious
choice (when the image of God entered into that line of primates), we made the decision to «sin» — to dominate and to kill in order to serve our own ends, rather than to follow the call of that «image of God» which had entered into the
human creature.
If «lifestyle,» as I said earlier, is a broad notion, it is also mighty thin, for it flattens all
human activity to a single plane: the only dimension it recognizes is the dimension of
choice.
This is possible
if only
human beings are given the freedom of
choice.
This
choice and the knowledge of good and evil were necessary
if human beings were to be rational.
For example, suppose that
if everyone chose to act in this way, the end we aim at would be destroyed; or that
if my
choice were repeated often enough, the
human race would disappear.
If we measure left and right by support for or opposition to abortion and Bill Clinton, which is a reasonable measure in this case, twelve of the groups represented are very far left indeed — including Catholics for a Free
Choice,
Human Rights Campaign (a leading gay rights organization), People for the American Way, AIDS National Interfaith Network, and Religious Coalition for Reproductive
Choice.
And all those people who had little
choice and died horrible deaths in the Old Testament for their sin, well, you don't have to end up like that in hell for eternity
if you just accept the free
human sacrifice that God gave us through Jesus.
If the world made no sense without revelation and grace,
human freedom would be impaired; no reason could be offered for any
choice, and faith's assent would be irrational and, hence, immoral.
If you answer that it is a
choice, that means that every
human — including yourself — is equally attracted to both men and women.
If the crime of transgression represents the
human aspiration to self - sufficiency and godliness (free
choice necessarily implying humanly grounded knowledge of good and bad), the so - called punishment thwarts that aspiration by opposition:
human beings instead of self - sufficiency receive estrangement, dependence, division, and rule.
In addition we would also like to have pleasurable experiences, but,
if a
choice must be made, respect seems the more crucial to
human person - hood.
If God is going to accomplish anything in the world, He has no
choice but to use sinful
human beings to do it.
If contingency is real in the nature of things, and if human beings are free to make selective choices which fix the future course of events, God's power can not be unlimited and his knowledge can not be complet
If contingency is real in the nature of things, and
if human beings are free to make selective choices which fix the future course of events, God's power can not be unlimited and his knowledge can not be complet
if human beings are free to make selective
choices which fix the future course of events, God's power can not be unlimited and his knowledge can not be complete.
And
if sacrificing the horse was ethical — and I would say it was the morally required,
if painful,
choice — doesn't that demonstrate that
human beings really do have greater value?
The completely absurd theory that all 7,000,000,000
human beings are simultaneously being supervised 24 hours a day, every day of their lives by an immortal, invisible being for the purposes of reward or punishment in the «afterlife» comes from the field of: (a) Astronomy; (b) Medicine; (c) Economics; or (d) Christianity You are about 70 % likely to believe the entire Universe began less than 10,000 years ago with only one man, one woman and a talking snake
if you are a: (a) historian; (b) geologist; (c) NASA astronomer; or (d) Christian I have convinced myself that gay $ ex is a
choice and not genetic, but then have no explanation as to why only gay people have ho.mo $ exual urges.
Life's too busy with the
humans and he'd prefer to go to the park
if there was a
choice.
Even
if Wenger had the ultimate
choice from invading aliens to either drop Giroud in favor for Sanchez or our damn
human civilization would be at stake, we all know what he would have chosen.
If you are a breastfeeding mom who has to pump regularly, whether you are pumping at work, exclusively pumping (by
choice or necessity), trying to increase your supply, breastfeeding multiples or donating to a
human milk bank, you probably don't want to spend all of your pumping time holding the horns.
Enter to WIN One (1) Spoiled Mama Bump Bag Bliss Gift Set valued at over $ 55 and one (1) Rookie
Humans crib sheet in the design of your
choice valued at $ 34.99 in our giveaway: a Rafflecopter giveaway And remember,
if you don't see something you want on Gugu Guru, you can add any product from any website — that's part of how we build our database.
As for puppies and kittens, I don't know
if formula designed for
humans would even be the most appropriate
choice for them.
Mayim Bialik, best know for her roles as «Blossom» and «Amy» in the Big Bang Theory, who holds a PH.D
if Neuroscience and is the recent author of «Beyond the Sling», mentioned that while in graduate school studying the hormones of
human attachment as part of her thesis, she started seeing the results of these kinds of parenting
choices.
Yet the real interest of politics is in its uncertainty, in how marginal
choices produce outcomes that must appear entertainingly arbitrary to the gods who know what would have happened
if the coin had fallen the other way, or
if a
human impulse had chosen a slightly different expression.
Soon, I hope my
human rights will include having the legal
choice to end my own suffering,
if needed.
«The set of catchy keywords that appeal to
humans is still bound by the way we process language, even
if we had unlimited
choice in top level domains,» he said.
If the
choice on TV was between watching a funny cartoon or a BBC documentary about animals or the
human body, I would always pick the latter.
This instinct is key to
human survival: No one food contains all the nutrients we need, so we're driven to eat a wide variety (even fish are influenced by variety and eat more
if they have more
choices).
This leaves room for variety in the exact macronutrient ratio of course, but it does suggest a basic formula for what
humans like to eat
if given a
choice.
If it was true the impairing of vitC absroption,
humans would have not included them as food of
choice.
I think the real story of «Happy - Go - Lucky» will be Eddie Marsan, who is creepy but diabolically
human,
if you'll forgive an odd adverb
choice.
To what extent do you view your investing life as an extension of your personal life?By that I mean to what extent do the personal morals and ethical values of Tim the man govern the investing decisions of Tim the dividend growth investor?
If you ask your typical dividend growth investor
if they would be willing to invest in a lucrative but immoral venture, say selling child pornography or crack cocaine, the answer would probably be «absolutely not» regardless of the yield, valuation or growth prospects of the underlying venture.And yet, ask that same investor what their thoughts are about Phillip Morris and they would probably describe what a wonderful investment it is and go on about why you should own it.Do your personal morals ever come into play when buying companies, or do you compartmentalize your conscience, wall it off from the part of your brain that thinks about investments, and make your investing decisions based on the financial prospects of the company?The reason why I'm asking is that I keep identifying stocks of companies that I love from an investing perspective but despise on a
human level.I can not in good conscience own any piece of Phillip Morris knowing the impact that smoking related illness has on the families of smokers.You might say that the smoker made his
choice to smoke so you don't mind taking his money, but his children never made that
choice and they are the ones who will suffer when he dies 20 years too soon.
Maybe, someday,
if money managers no longer are making salaries and bonuses I consider exorbitant, my predisposition toward
humans will swing my
choice the other way.
Dogs can change their moods just like
humans, so don't let first impressions force your decision; come back again once or twice (preferably at different times of the day), and see
if the same puppies react the same way.Perhaps adopting an adult dog would be a better
choice for you.
So
if you thought you had a lot of
choices in
Human Revolution, Mankind Divided easily doubles that.
Eidos Montreal head honcho Stephane D'Astous has suggested that when it comes to Thief 4 player
choice is crucial, and that the team are going to be pulling out all of the stops to try and make it as good,
if not better than, Deus Ex:
Human Revolution.
If you remember, there were three different races to choose from in addition to three separate classes and genders, each variation making up a unique name for your
choice (example: a male android Ranger was known as a RAcast; a female
human Ranger was a RAmarl).
If we
humans develop technologies that allow us to tap these sources, we can develop a much more equitable world, because many more places will enjoy the resources to generate their own energy one way or another or to at least have more
choices when it comes to picking their energy suppliers.
If the
choice is to fight for a pure Everglades and lose, or to work with nature as it changes and adapts to what we
humans have done to planet Earth, respecting its dynamism and resilience as it shifts to new states, I vote for the latter.
I would add that scientists (and science journalists) would do well to review the talk given by Thomas Lessl of the University of Georgia at the annual conference of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, on the limited role of science, even
if communicated clearly, in shaping policy and
human choices.
Anyone who thinks people are a good thing rather than a menace, and who believes
humans can find solutions to our problems
if we put our minds to it, should reject the population - control argument and make the case for full freedom of
choice on reproductive matters.
A certain amount of continued warming of the planet is projected to occur as a result of
human - induced emissions to date; another 0.5 °F increase would be expected over the next few decades even
if all emissions from
human activities suddenly stopped, 11 although natural variability could still play an important role over this time period.12 However,
choices made now and in the next few decades will determine the amount of additional future warming.
Even though many findings indicate a grim outlook for plant and animal life, including
humans,
if the current trends continue, the au - thors consistently note ways in which students can have a positive impact by making personal
choices and influencing public policy.
Even
if the
human user selecting a multiple
choice, after robot triages the general question, to more specific
choices.
If that doesn't work, Google the term «recruiter» or «
human resource director» along with the name of your employer of
choice.