Sentences with phrase «if human cloning»

As cloning pioneers Rudolf Jaenisch and Ian Wilmut have argued, «if human cloning is attempted, those embryos that do not die early may live to become abnormal children and adults; both are troubling outcomes.»

Not exact matches

If it is, in fact, human begetting that expresses our equal dignity, we should not lightly set it aside in a manner as decisive as cloning.

OAR then uses it in a cloning procedure that would be otherwise immoral if used on humans.

If these experiments support their hypothesis, they will be able to go on to similar human - cloning experiments because, according to OAR proponents, there is no moral issue left to be determined.

If one considers cloning, the storing of human fetuses for research purposes and organ harvesting, and the whole field of genetic manipulation, no one can fail to have noticed the slow erosion of human dignity that threatens us.

(6) If we proceed with research into human cloning, we must be mindful of those who are most likely to be exploited, and we must ensure the civil rights of those people who come into the world through cloning.

If this had been an attempt to clone a human being, would there have been 276 losses of cells and DNA material or 276 lost human lives?

The theological claim that only God can create human life is no less true if we learn to clone human beings than it is now.

I would, therefore, support morally responsible research that promises to advance our understanding of human biology and disease, even if such research made the path to human cloning easier.

If research into human cloning does move forward, we must ensure that it does not seek knowledge for its own sake, or only to promote monetary gain or individual fame, but to serve and protect the common good.

Again, if we are someday able through human cloning to eliminate genetic disorders from future individuals, we must ensure that those who remain with disabilities will not be discriminated against.

If it could be shown that research into human cloning would contribute to the well - being of the children and adults who already (or may someday) suffer from tragic genetic disorders (such as Down's syndrome or Huntington's disease) and that human cloning itself would benefit the children who are brought into the world through cloning.

(a) We should proceed with research into human cloning only if compelling arguments can be made for its potential benefits.

If eve came from Adams rib, they would share DNA (logically Adam's rib would have been Adams clone, not Eve, but disregarding logic as one must in such cases) therefore the relationship would be incestuous and would create humans with significant handicaps and disabilities, if anything at alIf eve came from Adams rib, they would share DNA (logically Adam's rib would have been Adams clone, not Eve, but disregarding logic as one must in such cases) therefore the relationship would be incestuous and would create humans with significant handicaps and disabilities, if anything at alif anything at all.

So what if we can send a man to the moon, and find a cure for cancer, and clone a human being?

«It gave critics plenty of ammunition to insist that if stem - cell research was funded, human reproductive cloning would be funded too,» says Caplan.

If the American public had not yet heard of human cloning or ACT by the fall of 2001, it could hardly have missed the hype that began on 25 November that year.

But if cloning of humans does prove practical, it may be impossible to prevent physicians from offering it — if not in the U.S., then offshore.

Nayernia says trying this approach in humans would spark controversy as it would involve creating embryonic clones of infertile men: «If we used this method in the clinic, it would raise ethical concerns.»

There was a larger ideology here, I sensed, reeling away in muted horror, a sort of pan-Twinism that would, if greatly magnified by the advent of human cloning, possibly postpone its internecine bloodbath until it had dealt with the rest of us.

«It sounds as if [they] are likely to proceed with cloning in humans despite animal data that raises concerns and worries about it,» says Mark Siegler, a doctor and ethicist at the University of Chicago.

The bill's text, if passed into state law, would protect teachers from discipline if they «help students understand, analyze, critique, and review in an objective manner the scientific strengths and scientific weaknesses of existing scientific theories covered in the course being taught,» namely, «biological evolution, the chemical origins of life, global warming, and human cloning.»

If the cells can be fertilized and develop into viable embryos, and if human ES cells turn out to have similar powers, such cells could allow researchers to get around some of the expense and ethical questions that arise from using donated eggs for therapeutic cloning experimentIf the cells can be fertilized and develop into viable embryos, and if human ES cells turn out to have similar powers, such cells could allow researchers to get around some of the expense and ethical questions that arise from using donated eggs for therapeutic cloning experimentif human ES cells turn out to have similar powers, such cells could allow researchers to get around some of the expense and ethical questions that arise from using donated eggs for therapeutic cloning experiments.

Even if it proves physically safe for the resulting children, human cloning raises its own share of ethics dilemmas.

If the same could be achieved in humans, it would mean that each of us could have clones of ourselves made from our own tissue.

And even if it is technically feasible, cloning requires large numbers of human eggs, which are in very short supply.

If I recall correctly, his paper had been published in Science, and it had been fast - tracked in what seemed transparently to be part of a political effort to sell the public on human cloning to produce patient - specific embryonic stem cells.

In which, if any, of the following instances do you support human cloning?

«If there is a link, it will provide further evidence of the dangers inherent in reproductive cloning and the irresponsibility of anybody who is trying to extend such work to humans.»

So to clone humans now is highly unethical because, even if successful, it is likely to result in serious birth defects.»

The nifty little thriller «Closer to God» tells the what - if story of the first human cloning and its fraught aftermath.

If you need to write a human cloning essay, you can apply to our team.

«There's nothing closer to humans than dogs and if we find it acceptable to clone dogs maybe the next logical step is humans,» said John Woestendiek, a Pulitzer Prize - winning reporter and author of «Dog, Inc.: The Uncanny Inside Story of Cloning Man's Best Friend.»