Sentences with phrase «if humans suffer»

Not exact matches

«If you're not able to relate to your coworkers as human beings and build positive relationships, your career will suffer.

If you stay in for the night, no one's worried that you're home suffering overexposure to human communication, or nursing a soul wounded by over-stimulation and interaction.

If health suffers, it tells us that human needs aren't being met.»

I suffered a terrible car accident... during 3 weeks I almost died «many times»... Now I can read a beautiful article like this one and agree with it... Believe me... no matter your faith, your fortune or whatever you may be involved with... on the face of death if you are human you will only care about your loved ones... you will remember about the moments you were happy together and dream they happen again... you will remember your childhood like you were 7 again... you will ask forgiveness and try to show your love, no matter how hard you are... In the face of death we realize that nothing more then our family matters... For the professor, once his life of arrogance reaches an end, he will then understand what is the meaning of family...

If you believe in God / Christ, then you have peace that no more suffering, pain, death, bickering among humans, corruption, death, and all of mankinds evil deeds, etc. etc. will exist when you exit this earth.

If god created all the organisms on the planet, then He must have created even the germs that have caused and are causing so much death and suffering for humans and animals.

This is an essential element if humans are to deal effectively with the problems of suffering.

If Christians must choose between thinking clearly and relating rightly to human suffering, they must choose the latter.

The argument of this sermon was open to criticism on the ground that the preacher seemed to take for granted a highly debatable view of the redemptive value of human suffering; yet he was calling attention to something very important, namely, that if we quote Baxter's words as Professor Lampe has done, we must not forget that the scope of Christ's suffering is limited.

When we enter the tomb of suffering, we have about as much control over the logistics as when we hit the car brakes on black - ice — and if there's anything human nature craves, it's control.

If only born - again Christians go to heaven, then the piles of suitcases and bags of human hair displayed at the Holocaust Museum represent thousands upon thousands of men, women, and children suffering eternal agony and the hands of angry God.

Even if this made any sense, there would be plenty of better eays to get across a message about who is in contol (like creating humans who already understand that) without making a world in which people suffer now and can be sent into eternal punish, ent.

We may go beyond the traditional theories of atonement and ask a radical question: «What account would be given of atonement if we were to interpret it from the standpoint of the most realistic analogies we know to human love when it deals with broken relationships and the consequent suffering?»

If the city is not made well, both humans and the ecological order will eventually suffer.

Since 1806 Mexico has suffered military intervention at least ten times by U.S. troops, and if there are no interventions in the offing now, perhaps it is largely because the U.S. has been shoring up the rule of one party, which wins rigged elections and then fails to challenge U.S. investment and business practices that increase human suffering for campesinos and urban poor there.

Plus IF this God suffered as Human than he would have understood the Reality of it and IF he was so compassionate and even empathetic, he would HAVE FIXED things out of sheer desire to not let anyone suffer so randomly and soemtimes allegedly at his very hands.

If it could be shown that research into human cloning would contribute to the well - being of the children and adults who already (or may someday) suffer from tragic genetic disorders (such as Down's syndrome or Huntington's disease) and that human cloning itself would benefit the children who are brought into the world through cloning.

The problem of reconciling human suffering with the existence of a God who loves, is only insoluble so long as we attach a trivial meaning to the word «love,» and look on things as if man were the centre of them.

If the world continues to accept disappearing tree - cover, land degradation, the expansion of deserts, the loss of plant and animal species, air and water pollution, and the changing chemistry of the atmosphere it will also have to accept economic decline and social disintegration... such disintegration would bring human suffering on a scale that has no precedent...» 7

Wow... if anyone is happy about the human suffering that will take place, THEY are a monster.

If he and Voltaire and all the other literary «smugglers» of the same grand, ancient truth are wrong, which I doubt, if there really is no afterlife, nothing, zero, zilch, at least there'll be no more intolerable suffering amond humans or among the sentient creatures we call «beasts.&raquIf he and Voltaire and all the other literary «smugglers» of the same grand, ancient truth are wrong, which I doubt, if there really is no afterlife, nothing, zero, zilch, at least there'll be no more intolerable suffering amond humans or among the sentient creatures we call «beasts.&raquif there really is no afterlife, nothing, zero, zilch, at least there'll be no more intolerable suffering amond humans or among the sentient creatures we call «beasts.»

If god created all the organisms on the planet, then He must have created even the germs and sickness that have caused and are causing so much death and suffering for humans and animals.

And if the suffering and despairing Jesus on the cross is accepted in one's heart and soul as a virtuous human being» if we can still, staring into our own abyss, wistfully hope to have his fortitude and compassion despite our enduring weaknesses» then is salvation really that far off?

I think that the references to hell are talking about the practice that was once used of sacrificing humans by burning them, and if we were evil we might suffer the same fate as those human sacrifices

However, if you in the slightest understand the human suffering 90 % of the human population would see then you are exhibiting a very nasty side of the human condition.

So if the catholic church was really serious about relieving human suffering they would promote family planning an help people have smaller families.

Because they know deep down that if they pray for world peace or an end to human suffering, it's not going to happen.

Just as these programs can help engage people in some these questions, it can also harden us and make us callous toward human suffering, if we're not careful.

When humans persist in sin despite God's frequent attempts to call them toward obedience and to warn them of what will happen if they continue down the path they are on, there comes a point where sometimes, God simply withdraws His hand of protection and allows people to suffer the consequences for their sin, for chaos to reign, and for Satan to bring death and destruction.

«If aliens turn up and show the relevant capacities and abilities to suffer, and all the other things we hold dear, then I would extend them the same moral consideration that I extend to humans.»

And though in the Fourth Gospel the notes of agonizing struggle, or even of ordinary human weakness and suffering, are muted, if not hushed, and the death is, as Vincent Taylor says, «no longer a (Greek word) but a shining stairway by which the Son of God ascends to his Father,» (The Atonement in New Testament Teaching, p. 215.

They admirably avoid the fundamental question that haunts Christian theology: if God who wills to be involved has created a world in which not even he can act in perfect blamelessness, how can God avoid the accusation of guilt — ultimate, primordial culpability for human suffering; culpability for that which we experience as evil?

When we think of all that has come from him in the impulse toward human freedom and dignity — the challenge of ignorance and the attempt to remedy it, the concern for and conquest of disease, the sensitivity to the needs and plight of the weak, destitute, helpless, and those in every kind of suffering, the stabilizing of the inner lives of millions of his followers around the world, and the fostering of a prophetic attack on such giant social evils as prejudice, injustice, and war — when we consider the things that have stemmed from this «penniless teacher of Nazareth,» we are dull indeed if the wonder of it does not sweep over our souls.

It is then no wonder why so many question God, for if the leaders of the churches have no comprehension as to why God has permitted suffering, then can anyone expect the masses of their followers for also not having insight into why God has permitted suffering to go on for some 6000 years of human history.

But as often repeated, it could sound as if the sufferings of Christ were merely a melodrama unrelated to the gravity of sin and the degradation of human nature.

But if all there is to be given is a causal explanation, for example, «I suffer a rare but medically understood muscular spasm,» it is still clearly a piece of human behavior but it is not, properly speaking, an «act.»

To speak and act as if there is no moral tension at the heart of the politics of health care is to give in to the temptation to deny that we ourselves, as citizens and human beings, have to suffer that tension.

How could it be moral to allow humans to suffer and die by the thousands, if you could prevent it?

For amid all the advantages of contemporary life, where fewer people suffer disease, hunger, or lack of opportunity than in years past, there still is probably no increase in the sum total of human happiness and very slight advantage, if any, in the main business of making sense of one's life.»

If God is good and all - powerful, why does God allow such terrible human suffering to continue?

The Leftovers is at its most interesting when it is a reflection on human grief, suffering and confusion about the big questions, and when it causes us to ask of ourselves, what if...?

If I interpret the prospectus of the CMC correctly, the objective of the CMC namely to «impart to men and women an education of the highest order in the art and science of medicine and to equip them in the spirit of Christ for service In the relief of suffering and promotion of health», that is, the idea of a combination of training in professional skills, moulding the technically trained in a culture of human values and motivation, equipping them to utilize technology to serve «with compassion and concern for the whole person», the people especially the weaker sections of society, and giving spiritual reinforcement of that culture by the «spirit of Christ» and the motto «Not to be Ministered unto but to Minister» derived from him, goes back in tradition to the founder herself (Prospectus MBBS Course p. 5).

The cosmic God - man can redeem suffering even if all human effort fails.

The apostle Paul compared the church to a human body: «If one part suffers, every part suffers with it; if one part is honored, every part rejoices with it» (1 CoIf one part suffers, every part suffers with it; if one part is honored, every part rejoices with it» (1 Coif one part is honored, every part rejoices with it» (1 Cor.

To put it even more «heretically»: If we understand that each of us is the embodiment of the Christ, the human aspect of God, then we can begin to realize that through us, some part of God must be just as tormented as unenlightened perpetrator, as «He» is as suffering victim.

Many people have a wrong view of history, God, and human nature so if you want real answers as to why death, suffering, and evil exist read this http://www.answersingenesis.org/assets/pdf/radio/death-and-suffering.pdf

Free will, even if humans have it, is not responsible for earthquakes, tsunamis, Hurricanes, pathogens etc., that kill and cause suffering for thousands.

NO Matter how painful or disturbing this is, the scriptures shows its never God's purpose for human to suffer, be it sickness or tragedy, the truth is that humans has exposed him self to alot of things that turn him to monster, so much so that he can take life at will without considering the consequence of his action.from all fairness if we humans subject ourselves to God's will most of the tragedies we face shouldn't happen at all.we are encouraged to listen to God when he speak

A further theological problem for AiG is that it seems to think that the move away from its «biblical worldview» explains all wars and suffering — as if the Fall has to do with the loss of a worldview, not the human condition of sin.

Overwhelming suffering and the callous destruction of human life bring to the fore Leibniz's problem of theodicy: How can one believe in a God of love if the seeming exercise of God's power results in such repeated calamity?