Sentences with phrase «if impact on the planet»

There are many ways to produce cotton if impact on the planet is ignored.

Not exact matches

But, how large will be the impact of an economic sanction on a nation if the economic sanction is imposed by China and India as they are the 2nd and 5th largest economies of the planet with combined GDP of 13.46 trillion dollars (72 % of U.S.A's GDP) which shows that US is not the only nation with the economic might to impose economic sanctions on nations.

If we start to extract immense amounts of power from the wind, for instance, it will have an impact on how warmth and water move around the planet, and thus on temperatures and rainfall (see «How clean is green?»).

If you take climate change seriously and you understand the cataclysmic impact that it will have on this planet, it is a no - brainer.

If we are to stop this from escalating and reduce the danger on those who inhabit this planet (human, fauna, and flora), we all need to do our part and reduce our impact on the Earth.

If you're particularly conscious of the impact that fast fashion has on the planet, then this is a fabulous place to shop.

Dell has partnered with designer Nikki Reid to create a jewelry line that has 99 % less impact on the planet than if it were traditionally mined.

At the end of the day, if it's only him making the difference here, he doesn't have an impact on the planet.

And if action is not taken soon, climate change will cause irreversible impacts on our planet.

If industry was having a material effect on the climate / temperature even then, it seems to me that man and planet earth are incompatible because there s no way that 7 billion people can have a negligible impact on the planet.

So, in the case of climate change, if we could flip a magic switch and turn off all our carbon emissions today, we would still see the impact of the Industrial Revolution on our planet for well over 5,000 years.

But he pointed out that even if the researchers» predictions are right and the planet warms just 4.1 degrees, this would nonetheless have a big impact on the global climate.

It is whether IPCC, as the supposed «gold standard» source for information on our planet's climate and on the human impact on our climate, has fallen into the trap of using «bad practices» and, if so, what other examples of such «bad practices» exist beside the «hide the decline» example?

So rather than claiming that climate science is a hoax, a fraud or fundamentally flawed, they now say the proposed climate policies will have little, if any, impact on the planet's temperature gauge and are therefore a waste of time and money.

Heavy snowstorms are not inconsistent with a warming planet... In fact, as the Earth gets warmer and more moisture gets absorbed into the atmosphere, we are steadily loading the dice in favor of more extreme storms in all seasons, capable of causing greater impacts on society... If the climate continues to warm, we should expect an increase in heavy snow events for a few decades, until the climate grows so warm that we pass the point where it's too warm for it to snow heavily.

If we did cause the climate to change due to our puny input, mankind can not really live on this planet without making a catastrophic impact on it.

Yes, those impacts must be addressed - I've said so repeated and it's been a part of my work for years - but if global warming is not also addressed, urgently and comprehensively, then most of the other moves to reverse human impacts on the ecology of the planet will have been for naught.

The motivation behind the concept is sound — we must account for, and quantify, the impacts of humanity on Earth's ecosystems if we are to manage the planet sustainably for the benefit of both human well - being and our natural heritage.

a) start off by making a hypothesis concerning the color of crows and how this impacts their habits b) based on the hypothesis, create model scenarios to simulate the color and behavior of crows c) investigate fossil remains of pre-historic Archaeopteryx d) declare that the paleo - avain findings check closely with the model e) validate the model scenarios by comparing them with one another f) declare that the hypothesis has been confirmed by the model simulations g) project that (if unabated by exorbitantly costly measures involving major payments to dictatorships in the developing world) black crows will destroy all other species plus our planet by 2100 h) ensure that «crow disaster scenario» is conveyed to public by a doomsday - hungry» media

If you would like to reduce your waste and lessen your impact on the planet, this class is for you!

But by asking if we could «see» truly ancient industrial civilizations, we were forced to ask about the generic kinds of impacts any civilization might have on a planet.

# 42 — Hank Roberts — If Plan B fails, Plan C must deal with the impact of 9 or 10 billion people on a planet with resources for perhaps as few as 2 without fossil carbon.

However my logic tells me that some back radiation (if there is any, or if you have found it) of CO2 on this planet will not have the slightest impact on the earth's temperature.

Alex, if that divide is preventing unilateral action on something as serious as human activities impacting the planet's climate it's a kind of tribalism that's doing us no good.

I decided long ago that much of this debate about mankind's relative impact on the planet could be resolved if only those involved stayed away from airplanes and drove the length of the continents by car.

After providing Internet marketing consulting services for a variety of industries (With clients such as Philips Medical, Arrow Electronics, Hearing Planet, MIT and numerous law firms, banks, retailers and colleges) I realized we could have a greater impact if we focused on one type of client.